Cargando…
Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial
BACKGROUND: The properties of semi-elemental enteral nutrition might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in brain-injured patients, known to suffer gastroparesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a semi-elemental versus a polymeric formula for enter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03456-7 |
_version_ | 1783638902036234240 |
---|---|
author | Carteron, Laurent Samain, Emmanuel Winiszewski, Hadrien Blasco, Gilles Balon, Anne-Sophie Gilli, Camille Piton, Gael Capellier, Gilles Pili-Floury, Sebastien Besch, Guillaume |
author_facet | Carteron, Laurent Samain, Emmanuel Winiszewski, Hadrien Blasco, Gilles Balon, Anne-Sophie Gilli, Camille Piton, Gael Capellier, Gilles Pili-Floury, Sebastien Besch, Guillaume |
author_sort | Carteron, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The properties of semi-elemental enteral nutrition might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in brain-injured patients, known to suffer gastroparesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a semi-elemental versus a polymeric formula for enteral nutrition (EN) in brain-injured critically ill patients. METHODS: Prospective, randomized study including brain-injured adult patients [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8] with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 h. Intervention: an enteral semi-elemental (SE group) or polymeric (P group) formula. EN was started within 36 h after admission to the intensive care unit and was delivered according to a standardized nurse-driven protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received both 60% of the daily energy goal at 3 days and 100% of the daily energy goal at 5 days after inclusion. Tolerance of EN was assessed by the rate of gastroparesis, vomiting and diarrhea. RESULTS: Respectively, 100 and 95 patients were analyzed in the SE and P groups: Age (57[44–65] versus 55[40–65] years) and GCS (6[3–7] versus 5[3–7]) did not differ between groups. The percentage of patients achieving the primary endpoint was similar (46% and 48%, respectively; relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.05 (0.78–1.42); p = 0.73). The mean daily energy intake was, respectively, 20.2 ± 6.3 versus 21.0 ± 6.5 kcal/kg/day (p = 0.42). Protein intakes were 1.3 ± 0.4 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg/day (p < 0.0001). Respectively, 18% versus 12% patients presented gastroparesis (p = 0.21), and 16% versus 8% patients suffered from diarrhea (p = 0.11). No patient presented vomiting in either group. CONCLUSION: Semi-elemental compared to polymeric formula did not improve daily energy intake or gastrointestinal tolerance of enteral nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT/ID-RCB 2012-A00078-35 (registered January 17, 2012). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78187402021-01-22 Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial Carteron, Laurent Samain, Emmanuel Winiszewski, Hadrien Blasco, Gilles Balon, Anne-Sophie Gilli, Camille Piton, Gael Capellier, Gilles Pili-Floury, Sebastien Besch, Guillaume Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The properties of semi-elemental enteral nutrition might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in brain-injured patients, known to suffer gastroparesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of a semi-elemental versus a polymeric formula for enteral nutrition (EN) in brain-injured critically ill patients. METHODS: Prospective, randomized study including brain-injured adult patients [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8] with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 h. Intervention: an enteral semi-elemental (SE group) or polymeric (P group) formula. EN was started within 36 h after admission to the intensive care unit and was delivered according to a standardized nurse-driven protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received both 60% of the daily energy goal at 3 days and 100% of the daily energy goal at 5 days after inclusion. Tolerance of EN was assessed by the rate of gastroparesis, vomiting and diarrhea. RESULTS: Respectively, 100 and 95 patients were analyzed in the SE and P groups: Age (57[44–65] versus 55[40–65] years) and GCS (6[3–7] versus 5[3–7]) did not differ between groups. The percentage of patients achieving the primary endpoint was similar (46% and 48%, respectively; relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.05 (0.78–1.42); p = 0.73). The mean daily energy intake was, respectively, 20.2 ± 6.3 versus 21.0 ± 6.5 kcal/kg/day (p = 0.42). Protein intakes were 1.3 ± 0.4 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 g/kg/day (p < 0.0001). Respectively, 18% versus 12% patients presented gastroparesis (p = 0.21), and 16% versus 8% patients suffered from diarrhea (p = 0.11). No patient presented vomiting in either group. CONCLUSION: Semi-elemental compared to polymeric formula did not improve daily energy intake or gastrointestinal tolerance of enteral nutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT/ID-RCB 2012-A00078-35 (registered January 17, 2012). BioMed Central 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7818740/ /pubmed/33472680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03456-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Carteron, Laurent Samain, Emmanuel Winiszewski, Hadrien Blasco, Gilles Balon, Anne-Sophie Gilli, Camille Piton, Gael Capellier, Gilles Pili-Floury, Sebastien Besch, Guillaume Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title | Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title_full | Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title_short | Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
title_sort | semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03456-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carteronlaurent semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT samainemmanuel semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT winiszewskihadrien semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT blascogilles semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT balonannesophie semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT gillicamille semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT pitongael semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT capelliergilles semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT piliflourysebastien semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial AT beschguillaume semielementalversuspolymericformulaforenteralnutritioninbraininjuredcriticallyillpatientsarandomizedtrial |