Cargando…

Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?

BACKGROUND: Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II–III mid-to-low rectal canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Numata, Masakatsu, Tamagawa, Hiroshi, Kazama, Keisuke, Kawahara, Shinnosuke, Sawazaki, Sho, Aoyama, Toru, Maezawa, Yukio, Kano, Kazuki, Higuchi, Akio, Godai, Teni, Saigusa, Yusuke, Saeki, Hiroyuki, Yukawa, Norio, Rino, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01053-1
_version_ 1783638906376290304
author Numata, Masakatsu
Tamagawa, Hiroshi
Kazama, Keisuke
Kawahara, Shinnosuke
Sawazaki, Sho
Aoyama, Toru
Maezawa, Yukio
Kano, Kazuki
Higuchi, Akio
Godai, Teni
Saigusa, Yusuke
Saeki, Hiroyuki
Yukawa, Norio
Rino, Yasushi
author_facet Numata, Masakatsu
Tamagawa, Hiroshi
Kazama, Keisuke
Kawahara, Shinnosuke
Sawazaki, Sho
Aoyama, Toru
Maezawa, Yukio
Kano, Kazuki
Higuchi, Akio
Godai, Teni
Saigusa, Yusuke
Saeki, Hiroyuki
Yukawa, Norio
Rino, Yasushi
author_sort Numata, Masakatsu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II–III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72). RESULTS: This practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78187582021-01-22 Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort? Numata, Masakatsu Tamagawa, Hiroshi Kazama, Keisuke Kawahara, Shinnosuke Sawazaki, Sho Aoyama, Toru Maezawa, Yukio Kano, Kazuki Higuchi, Akio Godai, Teni Saigusa, Yusuke Saeki, Hiroyuki Yukawa, Norio Rino, Yasushi BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II–III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72). RESULTS: This practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7818758/ /pubmed/33478441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01053-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Numata, Masakatsu
Tamagawa, Hiroshi
Kazama, Keisuke
Kawahara, Shinnosuke
Sawazaki, Sho
Aoyama, Toru
Maezawa, Yukio
Kano, Kazuki
Higuchi, Akio
Godai, Teni
Saigusa, Yusuke
Saeki, Hiroyuki
Yukawa, Norio
Rino, Yasushi
Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title_full Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title_fullStr Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title_full_unstemmed Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title_short Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
title_sort lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01053-1
work_keys_str_mv AT numatamasakatsu laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT tamagawahiroshi laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT kazamakeisuke laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT kawaharashinnosuke laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT sawazakisho laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT aoyamatoru laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT maezawayukio laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT kanokazuki laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT higuchiakio laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT godaiteni laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT saigusayusuke laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT saekihiroyuki laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT yukawanorio laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort
AT rinoyasushi laterallymphnodedissectionformidtolowrectalcancerisitsafeandeffectiveinapracticebasedcohort