Cargando…
Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792 |
_version_ | 1783638920152481792 |
---|---|
author | Macedo, Luciana G Hodges, Paul W. Bostick, Geoff Hancock, Mark Laberge, Maude Hanna, Steven Spadoni, Greg Gross, Anita Schneider, Julia |
author_facet | Macedo, Luciana G Hodges, Paul W. Bostick, Geoff Hancock, Mark Laberge, Maude Hanna, Steven Spadoni, Greg Gross, Anita Schneider, Julia |
author_sort | Macedo, Luciana G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual factors, then the effects of treatment could be greater. A recently published study provided evidence of better outcomes when patients are matched to the appropriate exercise type. The study demonstrated that a 15-item questionnaire, the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ), could identify patients who responded best to one of the two exercise approaches for LBP (motor control and graded activity). The primary aim of the current study isill be to evaluate whether preidentified baseline characteristics, including the LSIQ, can modify the response to two of the most common exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. Secondary aims include an economic evaluations with a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=414) will be recruited by primary care professionals and randomised (1:1) to receive motor control exercises or graded activity. Participants will undergo 12 sessions of exercise therapy over an 8-week period. The primary outcome will be physical function at 2 months using the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, function and quality of life measured at 2, 6 and 12 months. Potential effect modifiers will be the LSIQ, self-efficacy, coping strategies, kinesiophobia and measures of nociceptive pain and central sensitisation. We will construct linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, predictor (potential effect modifier), treatment group×predictor (potential effect modifier), physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrate Research Ethics Board. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04283409. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78188342021-01-25 Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol Macedo, Luciana G Hodges, Paul W. Bostick, Geoff Hancock, Mark Laberge, Maude Hanna, Steven Spadoni, Greg Gross, Anita Schneider, Julia BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual factors, then the effects of treatment could be greater. A recently published study provided evidence of better outcomes when patients are matched to the appropriate exercise type. The study demonstrated that a 15-item questionnaire, the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ), could identify patients who responded best to one of the two exercise approaches for LBP (motor control and graded activity). The primary aim of the current study isill be to evaluate whether preidentified baseline characteristics, including the LSIQ, can modify the response to two of the most common exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. Secondary aims include an economic evaluations with a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=414) will be recruited by primary care professionals and randomised (1:1) to receive motor control exercises or graded activity. Participants will undergo 12 sessions of exercise therapy over an 8-week period. The primary outcome will be physical function at 2 months using the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, function and quality of life measured at 2, 6 and 12 months. Potential effect modifiers will be the LSIQ, self-efficacy, coping strategies, kinesiophobia and measures of nociceptive pain and central sensitisation. We will construct linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, predictor (potential effect modifier), treatment group×predictor (potential effect modifier), physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrate Research Ethics Board. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04283409. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7818834/ /pubmed/33472786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Macedo, Luciana G Hodges, Paul W. Bostick, Geoff Hancock, Mark Laberge, Maude Hanna, Steven Spadoni, Greg Gross, Anita Schneider, Julia Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title | Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full | Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_short | Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
title_sort | which exercise for low back pain? (welback) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macedolucianag whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT hodgespaulw whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT bostickgeoff whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT hancockmark whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT labergemaude whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT hannasteven whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT spadonigreg whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT grossanita whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT schneiderjulia whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol |