Cargando…

Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macedo, Luciana G, Hodges, Paul W., Bostick, Geoff, Hancock, Mark, Laberge, Maude, Hanna, Steven, Spadoni, Greg, Gross, Anita, Schneider, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792
_version_ 1783638920152481792
author Macedo, Luciana G
Hodges, Paul W.
Bostick, Geoff
Hancock, Mark
Laberge, Maude
Hanna, Steven
Spadoni, Greg
Gross, Anita
Schneider, Julia
author_facet Macedo, Luciana G
Hodges, Paul W.
Bostick, Geoff
Hancock, Mark
Laberge, Maude
Hanna, Steven
Spadoni, Greg
Gross, Anita
Schneider, Julia
author_sort Macedo, Luciana G
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual factors, then the effects of treatment could be greater. A recently published study provided evidence of better outcomes when patients are matched to the appropriate exercise type. The study demonstrated that a 15-item questionnaire, the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ), could identify patients who responded best to one of the two exercise approaches for LBP (motor control and graded activity). The primary aim of the current study isill be to evaluate whether preidentified baseline characteristics, including the LSIQ, can modify the response to two of the most common exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. Secondary aims include an economic evaluations with a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=414) will be recruited by primary care professionals and randomised (1:1) to receive motor control exercises or graded activity. Participants will undergo 12 sessions of exercise therapy over an 8-week period. The primary outcome will be physical function at 2 months using the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, function and quality of life measured at 2, 6 and 12 months. Potential effect modifiers will be the LSIQ, self-efficacy, coping strategies, kinesiophobia and measures of nociceptive pain and central sensitisation. We will construct linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, predictor (potential effect modifier), treatment group×predictor (potential effect modifier), physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrate Research Ethics Board. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04283409.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78188342021-01-25 Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol Macedo, Luciana G Hodges, Paul W. Bostick, Geoff Hancock, Mark Laberge, Maude Hanna, Steven Spadoni, Greg Gross, Anita Schneider, Julia BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Effect sizes for exercises are usually small to moderate and could be due to the heterogeneity of people presenting with LBP. Thus, if patients could be better matched to exercise based on individual factors, then the effects of treatment could be greater. A recently published study provided evidence of better outcomes when patients are matched to the appropriate exercise type. The study demonstrated that a 15-item questionnaire, the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ), could identify patients who responded best to one of the two exercise approaches for LBP (motor control and graded activity). The primary aim of the current study isill be to evaluate whether preidentified baseline characteristics, including the LSIQ, can modify the response to two of the most common exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. Secondary aims include an economic evaluations with a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=414) will be recruited by primary care professionals and randomised (1:1) to receive motor control exercises or graded activity. Participants will undergo 12 sessions of exercise therapy over an 8-week period. The primary outcome will be physical function at 2 months using the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity, function and quality of life measured at 2, 6 and 12 months. Potential effect modifiers will be the LSIQ, self-efficacy, coping strategies, kinesiophobia and measures of nociceptive pain and central sensitisation. We will construct linear mixed models with terms for participants (fixed), treatment group, predictor (potential effect modifier), treatment group×predictor (potential effect modifier), physiotherapists, treatment group×physiotherapists and baseline score for the dependent variable. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval from the Hamilton Integrate Research Ethics Board. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04283409. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7818834/ /pubmed/33472786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Macedo, Luciana G
Hodges, Paul W.
Bostick, Geoff
Hancock, Mark
Laberge, Maude
Hanna, Steven
Spadoni, Greg
Gross, Anita
Schneider, Julia
Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title_full Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title_fullStr Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title_short Which Exercise for Low Back Pain? (WELBack) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
title_sort which exercise for low back pain? (welback) trial predicting response to exercise treatments for patients with low back pain: a validation randomised controlled trial protocol
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042792
work_keys_str_mv AT macedolucianag whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT hodgespaulw whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT bostickgeoff whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT hancockmark whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT labergemaude whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT hannasteven whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT spadonigreg whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT grossanita whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT schneiderjulia whichexerciseforlowbackpainwelbacktrialpredictingresponsetoexercisetreatmentsforpatientswithlowbackpainavalidationrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol