Cargando…

An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study

BACKGROUND: Ending the global tuberculosis (TB) epidemic requires a focus on treating individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent future cases. Promising trials of shorter regimens have shown them to be effective as preventative TB treatment, however there is a paucity of data on self-adm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Surey, J., Stagg, H. R., Yates, T. A., Lipman, M., White, P. J., Charlett, A., Muñoz, L., Gosce, L., Rangaka, M. X., Francis, M., Hack, V., Kunst, H., Abubakar, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05766-9
_version_ 1783638941646192640
author Surey, J.
Stagg, H. R.
Yates, T. A.
Lipman, M.
White, P. J.
Charlett, A.
Muñoz, L.
Gosce, L.
Rangaka, M. X.
Francis, M.
Hack, V.
Kunst, H.
Abubakar, I.
author_facet Surey, J.
Stagg, H. R.
Yates, T. A.
Lipman, M.
White, P. J.
Charlett, A.
Muñoz, L.
Gosce, L.
Rangaka, M. X.
Francis, M.
Hack, V.
Kunst, H.
Abubakar, I.
author_sort Surey, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ending the global tuberculosis (TB) epidemic requires a focus on treating individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent future cases. Promising trials of shorter regimens have shown them to be effective as preventative TB treatment, however there is a paucity of data on self-administered treatment completion rates. This pilot trial assessed treatment completion, adherence, safety and the feasibility of treating LTBI in the UK using a weekly rifapentine and isoniazid regimen versus daily rifampicin and isoniazid, both self-administered for 12 weeks. METHODS: An open label, randomised, multi-site pilot trial was conducted in London, UK, between March 2015 and January 2017. Adults between 16 and 65 years with LTBI at two TB clinics who were eligible for and agreed to preventative therapy were consented and randomised 1:1 to receive either a weekly combination of rifapentine/isoniazid (‘intervention’) or a daily combination of rifampicin/isoniazid (‘standard’), with both regimens taken for twelve weeks; treatment was self-administered in both arms. The primary outcome, completion of treatment, was self-reported, defined as taking more than 90% of prescribed doses and corroborated by pill counts and urine testing. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were successfully enrolled. In the intervention arm 21 of 27 patients completed treatment (77.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7–91.4), compared with 19 of 25 (76.0%, CI 54.9–90.6) in the standard of care arm. There was a similar adverse effect profile between the two arms. CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, treatment completion was comparable between the weekly rifapentine/isoniazid and the daily rifampicin/isoniazid regimens. Additionally, the adverse event profile was similar between the two arms. We conclude that it is safe and feasible to undertake a fully powered trial to determine whether self-administered weekly treatment is superior/non-inferior compared to current treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was funded by the NIHR, UK and registered with ISRCTN (26/02/2013-No.04379941). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05766-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78189352021-01-22 An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study Surey, J. Stagg, H. R. Yates, T. A. Lipman, M. White, P. J. Charlett, A. Muñoz, L. Gosce, L. Rangaka, M. X. Francis, M. Hack, V. Kunst, H. Abubakar, I. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Ending the global tuberculosis (TB) epidemic requires a focus on treating individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI) to prevent future cases. Promising trials of shorter regimens have shown them to be effective as preventative TB treatment, however there is a paucity of data on self-administered treatment completion rates. This pilot trial assessed treatment completion, adherence, safety and the feasibility of treating LTBI in the UK using a weekly rifapentine and isoniazid regimen versus daily rifampicin and isoniazid, both self-administered for 12 weeks. METHODS: An open label, randomised, multi-site pilot trial was conducted in London, UK, between March 2015 and January 2017. Adults between 16 and 65 years with LTBI at two TB clinics who were eligible for and agreed to preventative therapy were consented and randomised 1:1 to receive either a weekly combination of rifapentine/isoniazid (‘intervention’) or a daily combination of rifampicin/isoniazid (‘standard’), with both regimens taken for twelve weeks; treatment was self-administered in both arms. The primary outcome, completion of treatment, was self-reported, defined as taking more than 90% of prescribed doses and corroborated by pill counts and urine testing. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were successfully enrolled. In the intervention arm 21 of 27 patients completed treatment (77.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7–91.4), compared with 19 of 25 (76.0%, CI 54.9–90.6) in the standard of care arm. There was a similar adverse effect profile between the two arms. CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, treatment completion was comparable between the weekly rifapentine/isoniazid and the daily rifampicin/isoniazid regimens. Additionally, the adverse event profile was similar between the two arms. We conclude that it is safe and feasible to undertake a fully powered trial to determine whether self-administered weekly treatment is superior/non-inferior compared to current treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was funded by the NIHR, UK and registered with ISRCTN (26/02/2013-No.04379941). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-05766-9. BioMed Central 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7818935/ /pubmed/33478428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05766-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Surey, J.
Stagg, H. R.
Yates, T. A.
Lipman, M.
White, P. J.
Charlett, A.
Muñoz, L.
Gosce, L.
Rangaka, M. X.
Francis, M.
Hack, V.
Kunst, H.
Abubakar, I.
An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title_full An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title_fullStr An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title_full_unstemmed An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title_short An open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in England: the HALT LTBI pilot study
title_sort open label, randomised controlled trial of rifapentine versus rifampicin based short course regimens for the treatment of latent tuberculosis in england: the halt ltbi pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05766-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sureyj anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT stagghr anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT yatesta anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT lipmanm anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT whitepj anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT charletta anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT munozl anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT goscel anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT rangakamx anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT francism anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT hackv anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT kunsth anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT abubakari anopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT sureyj openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT stagghr openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT yatesta openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT lipmanm openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT whitepj openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT charletta openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT munozl openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT goscel openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT rangakamx openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT francism openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT hackv openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT kunsth openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy
AT abubakari openlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialofrifapentineversusrifampicinbasedshortcourseregimensforthetreatmentoflatenttuberculosisinenglandthehaltltbipilotstudy