Cargando…

Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach

PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a routine operation for the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures (OLCFs). As is well known, unilateral puncture is a common method. However, with the conventional transpedicular approach (CTPA), the cement may be asymmetrically disperse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wenwu, Liu, Shenpeng, Liu, Xianhua, Li, Xiang, Wang, Le, Wan, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02219-6
_version_ 1783638943576621056
author Zhang, Wenwu
Liu, Shenpeng
Liu, Xianhua
Li, Xiang
Wang, Le
Wan, Yong
author_facet Zhang, Wenwu
Liu, Shenpeng
Liu, Xianhua
Li, Xiang
Wang, Le
Wan, Yong
author_sort Zhang, Wenwu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a routine operation for the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures (OLCFs). As is well known, unilateral puncture is a common method. However, with the conventional transpedicular approach (CTPA), the cement may be asymmetrically dispersed, so some surgeons use the transverse process root-pedicle approach (TPRPA). The objective of this study was to compare the clinical results and bone cement distribution of PVP for OLCF with unilateral TPRPA and CTPA to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2019, seventy-two elderly patients who underwent unilateral PVP for single-level OLCF were retrospectively reviewed. Operation time, injection amount and type of bone cement distribution, and bone cement leakage and surgical complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical results. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months, and the assessment was based primarily on clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the surgical time and the volume and the type of bone cement distribution and the lost of operative vertebra height between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in bone cement leakage. Moreover, there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the two groups at 2 days and 12 months after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral TPRPA and CTPA are practical and feasible methods in PVP for the treatment of OLCF, and they have similar clinical effects. However, TPRPA has the advantages of a better distribution of bone cement and a shorter operation time and a better maintenance effect of injured vertebra height, without increasing the rate of bone cement leakage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78189442021-01-22 Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach Zhang, Wenwu Liu, Shenpeng Liu, Xianhua Li, Xiang Wang, Le Wan, Yong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a routine operation for the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures (OLCFs). As is well known, unilateral puncture is a common method. However, with the conventional transpedicular approach (CTPA), the cement may be asymmetrically dispersed, so some surgeons use the transverse process root-pedicle approach (TPRPA). The objective of this study was to compare the clinical results and bone cement distribution of PVP for OLCF with unilateral TPRPA and CTPA to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2019, seventy-two elderly patients who underwent unilateral PVP for single-level OLCF were retrospectively reviewed. Operation time, injection amount and type of bone cement distribution, and bone cement leakage and surgical complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical results. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months, and the assessment was based primarily on clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the surgical time and the volume and the type of bone cement distribution and the lost of operative vertebra height between the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in bone cement leakage. Moreover, there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the two groups at 2 days and 12 months after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral TPRPA and CTPA are practical and feasible methods in PVP for the treatment of OLCF, and they have similar clinical effects. However, TPRPA has the advantages of a better distribution of bone cement and a shorter operation time and a better maintenance effect of injured vertebra height, without increasing the rate of bone cement leakage. BioMed Central 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7818944/ /pubmed/33478545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02219-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Wenwu
Liu, Shenpeng
Liu, Xianhua
Li, Xiang
Wang, Le
Wan, Yong
Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title_full Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title_fullStr Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title_short Unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
title_sort unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic lumbar compression fractures: a comparative study between transverse process root-pedicle approach and conventional transpedicular approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwenwu unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach
AT liushenpeng unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach
AT liuxianhua unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach
AT lixiang unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach
AT wangle unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach
AT wanyong unilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticlumbarcompressionfracturesacomparativestudybetweentransverseprocessrootpedicleapproachandconventionaltranspedicularapproach