Cargando…

Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program

BACKGROUND: Ohio’s medical cannabis program is one of three states that require physicians to become certified to recommend medical cannabis to their patients. The current study examines the attitudes of Ohio physicians toward medical cannabis and Ohio’s program to ascertain how likely physicians ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, Emilia, Gunter, Joshua, Tanner, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-020-00025-1
_version_ 1783638991721988096
author Lombardi, Emilia
Gunter, Joshua
Tanner, Erin
author_facet Lombardi, Emilia
Gunter, Joshua
Tanner, Erin
author_sort Lombardi, Emilia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ohio’s medical cannabis program is one of three states that require physicians to become certified to recommend medical cannabis to their patients. The current study examines the attitudes of Ohio physicians toward medical cannabis and Ohio’s program to ascertain how likely physicians are to participate in Ohio’s program. METHODS: Physicians were invited to complete an internet survey that asked them about their concerns regarding medical marijuana, Ohio’s program, their likelihood of recommending medical cannabis, and becoming certified within the state. Ordinal and logistic regressions were used to understand the physicians’ likelihood of recommending cannabis, of becoming certified to recommend cannabis, and their attitude toward Ohio’s program. RESULTS: In total, 11,665 physicians licensed to practice in Ohio were contacted by email, and 344 responses were received for a response rate of 2.9%. Only 42 physicians reported being certified or had plans to become certified to recommend marijuana, and 62% were unlikely to recommend marijuana to their patients. Overall, the belief that medical cannabis should be legal had the greatest association with the likelihood of recommending cannabis (OR = .37, 95% CI = .24–.54), of becoming certified (OR = .21, 95% CI = .10–.38), and believing that Ohio’s program is too strict (OR = .39, 95% CI = .30–.51). However, the study sample precludes generalizing the results beyond this study. The 2.9% response rate could indicate a bias toward physicians who have strong opinions about the legality of medical cannabis. CONCLUSION: The results show that many physicians have concerns about medical cannabis and Ohio’s program, and many physicians may not participate in the program. This could be a problem for patients who would like to use cannabis for medical reasons; therefore, these patients, may need to utilize one physician for cannabis and another for regular care. Physicians will likely be caring for patients who are using cannabis regardless of their own beliefs about it. The lack of training regarding cannabis in healthcare, along with requiring “certified recommenders” to have training could result in a fractured healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7819327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78193272021-01-25 Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program Lombardi, Emilia Gunter, Joshua Tanner, Erin J Cannabis Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Ohio’s medical cannabis program is one of three states that require physicians to become certified to recommend medical cannabis to their patients. The current study examines the attitudes of Ohio physicians toward medical cannabis and Ohio’s program to ascertain how likely physicians are to participate in Ohio’s program. METHODS: Physicians were invited to complete an internet survey that asked them about their concerns regarding medical marijuana, Ohio’s program, their likelihood of recommending medical cannabis, and becoming certified within the state. Ordinal and logistic regressions were used to understand the physicians’ likelihood of recommending cannabis, of becoming certified to recommend cannabis, and their attitude toward Ohio’s program. RESULTS: In total, 11,665 physicians licensed to practice in Ohio were contacted by email, and 344 responses were received for a response rate of 2.9%. Only 42 physicians reported being certified or had plans to become certified to recommend marijuana, and 62% were unlikely to recommend marijuana to their patients. Overall, the belief that medical cannabis should be legal had the greatest association with the likelihood of recommending cannabis (OR = .37, 95% CI = .24–.54), of becoming certified (OR = .21, 95% CI = .10–.38), and believing that Ohio’s program is too strict (OR = .39, 95% CI = .30–.51). However, the study sample precludes generalizing the results beyond this study. The 2.9% response rate could indicate a bias toward physicians who have strong opinions about the legality of medical cannabis. CONCLUSION: The results show that many physicians have concerns about medical cannabis and Ohio’s program, and many physicians may not participate in the program. This could be a problem for patients who would like to use cannabis for medical reasons; therefore, these patients, may need to utilize one physician for cannabis and another for regular care. Physicians will likely be caring for patients who are using cannabis regardless of their own beliefs about it. The lack of training regarding cannabis in healthcare, along with requiring “certified recommenders” to have training could result in a fractured healthcare system. BioMed Central 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7819327/ /pubmed/33526115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-020-00025-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lombardi, Emilia
Gunter, Joshua
Tanner, Erin
Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title_full Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title_fullStr Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title_full_unstemmed Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title_short Ohio physician attitudes toward medical Cannabis and Ohio’s medical marijuana program
title_sort ohio physician attitudes toward medical cannabis and ohio’s medical marijuana program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-020-00025-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardiemilia ohiophysicianattitudestowardmedicalcannabisandohiosmedicalmarijuanaprogram
AT gunterjoshua ohiophysicianattitudestowardmedicalcannabisandohiosmedicalmarijuanaprogram
AT tannererin ohiophysicianattitudestowardmedicalcannabisandohiosmedicalmarijuanaprogram