Cargando…

Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker

Background: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices improves clinical outcomes, but data on the association between the transmission rate (TR) of the remote monitoring, calculated in percentage as the ratio between days of transmission and days of follow-up after remote monitorin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goto, Toshihiko, Mori, Kento, Nakayama, Takafumi, Yamamoto, Junki, Shintani, Yasuhiro, Nakasuka, Kosuke, Wakami, Kazuaki, Fukuta, Hidekatsu, Seo, Yoshihiro, Ohte, Nobuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Circulation Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0071
_version_ 1783639047936147456
author Goto, Toshihiko
Mori, Kento
Nakayama, Takafumi
Yamamoto, Junki
Shintani, Yasuhiro
Nakasuka, Kosuke
Wakami, Kazuaki
Fukuta, Hidekatsu
Seo, Yoshihiro
Ohte, Nobuyuki
author_facet Goto, Toshihiko
Mori, Kento
Nakayama, Takafumi
Yamamoto, Junki
Shintani, Yasuhiro
Nakasuka, Kosuke
Wakami, Kazuaki
Fukuta, Hidekatsu
Seo, Yoshihiro
Ohte, Nobuyuki
author_sort Goto, Toshihiko
collection PubMed
description Background: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices improves clinical outcomes, but data on the association between the transmission rate (TR) of the remote monitoring, calculated in percentage as the ratio between days of transmission and days of follow-up after remote monitoring introduction, and death in patients with a pacemaker are limited. Methods and Results: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we investigated 180 patients with a newly implanted pacemaker capable of using a specific remote monitoring system with daily transmission (79.5±8.8 years, men 50.6%). The study endpoint was all-cause death. During the follow-up period (median 2.7 years), 33 all-cause deaths were reported, and the TR was significantly lower in the deceased patients than in the survivors (89.6±9.6% vs. 95.4±7.0%, P<0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for TR to predict all-cause death was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.81, P<0.001). A TR of 95% had sensitivity of 74.1% and specificity of 63.6% for predicting all-cause death. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, TR <95% was selected as a predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.61–7.27, P=0.001). Conclusions: Low TR is a predictor of all-cause death in patients with a pacemaker. Patients with TR ≥95% may experience a lower incidence of death, and should have a good prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7819664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Circulation Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78196642021-03-09 Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker Goto, Toshihiko Mori, Kento Nakayama, Takafumi Yamamoto, Junki Shintani, Yasuhiro Nakasuka, Kosuke Wakami, Kazuaki Fukuta, Hidekatsu Seo, Yoshihiro Ohte, Nobuyuki Circ Rep Original article Background: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices improves clinical outcomes, but data on the association between the transmission rate (TR) of the remote monitoring, calculated in percentage as the ratio between days of transmission and days of follow-up after remote monitoring introduction, and death in patients with a pacemaker are limited. Methods and Results: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we investigated 180 patients with a newly implanted pacemaker capable of using a specific remote monitoring system with daily transmission (79.5±8.8 years, men 50.6%). The study endpoint was all-cause death. During the follow-up period (median 2.7 years), 33 all-cause deaths were reported, and the TR was significantly lower in the deceased patients than in the survivors (89.6±9.6% vs. 95.4±7.0%, P<0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for TR to predict all-cause death was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.81, P<0.001). A TR of 95% had sensitivity of 74.1% and specificity of 63.6% for predicting all-cause death. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, TR <95% was selected as a predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.61–7.27, P=0.001). Conclusions: Low TR is a predictor of all-cause death in patients with a pacemaker. Patients with TR ≥95% may experience a lower incidence of death, and should have a good prognosis. The Japanese Circulation Society 2020-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7819664/ /pubmed/33693272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0071 Text en Copyright © 2020, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original article
Goto, Toshihiko
Mori, Kento
Nakayama, Takafumi
Yamamoto, Junki
Shintani, Yasuhiro
Nakasuka, Kosuke
Wakami, Kazuaki
Fukuta, Hidekatsu
Seo, Yoshihiro
Ohte, Nobuyuki
Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title_full Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title_fullStr Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title_full_unstemmed Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title_short Transmission Rate of Remote Monitoring and Mortality in Patients With Pacemaker
title_sort transmission rate of remote monitoring and mortality in patients with pacemaker
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0071
work_keys_str_mv AT gototoshihiko transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT morikento transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT nakayamatakafumi transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT yamamotojunki transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT shintaniyasuhiro transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT nakasukakosuke transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT wakamikazuaki transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT fukutahidekatsu transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT seoyoshihiro transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker
AT ohtenobuyuki transmissionrateofremotemonitoringandmortalityinpatientswithpacemaker