Cargando…
Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2 |
_version_ | 1783639095806787584 |
---|---|
author | Uysal, Daniel Gasch, Claudia Behnisch, Rouven Nickel, Felix Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Hohenfellner, Markus Teber, Dogu |
author_facet | Uysal, Daniel Gasch, Claudia Behnisch, Rouven Nickel, Felix Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Hohenfellner, Markus Teber, Dogu |
author_sort | Uysal, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized ALI with CLI in a series of standardized laparoscopic tasks performed by laparoscopic novices. Further, usability of the new ALI was assessed. METHODS: A randomized cross-over study with 50 laparoscopic novices who either started with CLI and then changed to ALI (CA) or vice versa (AC) was conducted. All participants performed the European training in basic laparoscopic urological skills (E-BLUS) with each instrument in given order. Time and errors were measured for each exercise. Instrument usability was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, using CLI was significantly faster (CLI 4:27 min vs. ALI 4:50 min; p-value 0.005) and associated with fewer exercise failures in needle guidance (CLI 0 vs. ALI 12; p-value 0.0005) than ALI. Median amount of errors was similar for both instruments. Instrument sequence did not matter, as CA and AC showed comparable completion times. Regarding the learning effect, participants were significantly faster in the second attempt of exercises than in the first. In the needle guidance task, participants using CLI last demonstrated a significant speed improvement, whereas ALI were significantly slower in the second run. Regarding usability, CLI were preferred over ALI due to lighter weight and easier handling. Nevertheless, participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom. CONCLUSION: Using new motorized ALI in the E-BLUS examination by laparoscopic novices led to a worse performance compared to CLI. An explanation could be that participants felt overwhelmed by ALI and that ALI have an own distinct learning curve. As participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom, however, a future application of ALI could be for training purposes, ideally in combination with CLI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7819923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78199232021-01-28 Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum Uysal, Daniel Gasch, Claudia Behnisch, Rouven Nickel, Felix Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Hohenfellner, Markus Teber, Dogu Surg Endosc New Technology BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized ALI with CLI in a series of standardized laparoscopic tasks performed by laparoscopic novices. Further, usability of the new ALI was assessed. METHODS: A randomized cross-over study with 50 laparoscopic novices who either started with CLI and then changed to ALI (CA) or vice versa (AC) was conducted. All participants performed the European training in basic laparoscopic urological skills (E-BLUS) with each instrument in given order. Time and errors were measured for each exercise. Instrument usability was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, using CLI was significantly faster (CLI 4:27 min vs. ALI 4:50 min; p-value 0.005) and associated with fewer exercise failures in needle guidance (CLI 0 vs. ALI 12; p-value 0.0005) than ALI. Median amount of errors was similar for both instruments. Instrument sequence did not matter, as CA and AC showed comparable completion times. Regarding the learning effect, participants were significantly faster in the second attempt of exercises than in the first. In the needle guidance task, participants using CLI last demonstrated a significant speed improvement, whereas ALI were significantly slower in the second run. Regarding usability, CLI were preferred over ALI due to lighter weight and easier handling. Nevertheless, participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom. CONCLUSION: Using new motorized ALI in the E-BLUS examination by laparoscopic novices led to a worse performance compared to CLI. An explanation could be that participants felt overwhelmed by ALI and that ALI have an own distinct learning curve. As participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom, however, a future application of ALI could be for training purposes, ideally in combination with CLI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7819923/ /pubmed/33079238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | New Technology Uysal, Daniel Gasch, Claudia Behnisch, Rouven Nickel, Felix Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Hohenfellner, Markus Teber, Dogu Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title | Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title_full | Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title_short | Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
title_sort | evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum |
topic | New Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uysaldaniel evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT gaschclaudia evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT behnischrouven evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT nickelfelix evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT mullerstichbeatpeter evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT hohenfellnermarkus evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum AT teberdogu evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum |