Cargando…

Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum

BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uysal, Daniel, Gasch, Claudia, Behnisch, Rouven, Nickel, Felix, Müller-Stich, Beat Peter, Hohenfellner, Markus, Teber, Dogu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2
_version_ 1783639095806787584
author Uysal, Daniel
Gasch, Claudia
Behnisch, Rouven
Nickel, Felix
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Hohenfellner, Markus
Teber, Dogu
author_facet Uysal, Daniel
Gasch, Claudia
Behnisch, Rouven
Nickel, Felix
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Hohenfellner, Markus
Teber, Dogu
author_sort Uysal, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized ALI with CLI in a series of standardized laparoscopic tasks performed by laparoscopic novices. Further, usability of the new ALI was assessed. METHODS: A randomized cross-over study with 50 laparoscopic novices who either started with CLI and then changed to ALI (CA) or vice versa (AC) was conducted. All participants performed the European training in basic laparoscopic urological skills (E-BLUS) with each instrument in given order. Time and errors were measured for each exercise. Instrument usability was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, using CLI was significantly faster (CLI 4:27 min vs. ALI 4:50 min; p-value 0.005) and associated with fewer exercise failures in needle guidance (CLI 0 vs. ALI 12; p-value 0.0005) than ALI. Median amount of errors was similar for both instruments. Instrument sequence did not matter, as CA and AC showed comparable completion times. Regarding the learning effect, participants were significantly faster in the second attempt of exercises than in the first. In the needle guidance task, participants using CLI last demonstrated a significant speed improvement, whereas ALI were significantly slower in the second run. Regarding usability, CLI were preferred over ALI due to lighter weight and easier handling. Nevertheless, participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom. CONCLUSION: Using new motorized ALI in the E-BLUS examination by laparoscopic novices led to a worse performance compared to CLI. An explanation could be that participants felt overwhelmed by ALI and that ALI have an own distinct learning curve. As participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom, however, a future application of ALI could be for training purposes, ideally in combination with CLI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7819923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78199232021-01-28 Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum Uysal, Daniel Gasch, Claudia Behnisch, Rouven Nickel, Felix Müller-Stich, Beat Peter Hohenfellner, Markus Teber, Dogu Surg Endosc New Technology BACKGROUND: Motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized ALI with CLI in a series of standardized laparoscopic tasks performed by laparoscopic novices. Further, usability of the new ALI was assessed. METHODS: A randomized cross-over study with 50 laparoscopic novices who either started with CLI and then changed to ALI (CA) or vice versa (AC) was conducted. All participants performed the European training in basic laparoscopic urological skills (E-BLUS) with each instrument in given order. Time and errors were measured for each exercise. Instrument usability was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, using CLI was significantly faster (CLI 4:27 min vs. ALI 4:50 min; p-value 0.005) and associated with fewer exercise failures in needle guidance (CLI 0 vs. ALI 12; p-value 0.0005) than ALI. Median amount of errors was similar for both instruments. Instrument sequence did not matter, as CA and AC showed comparable completion times. Regarding the learning effect, participants were significantly faster in the second attempt of exercises than in the first. In the needle guidance task, participants using CLI last demonstrated a significant speed improvement, whereas ALI were significantly slower in the second run. Regarding usability, CLI were preferred over ALI due to lighter weight and easier handling. Nevertheless, participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom. CONCLUSION: Using new motorized ALI in the E-BLUS examination by laparoscopic novices led to a worse performance compared to CLI. An explanation could be that participants felt overwhelmed by ALI and that ALI have an own distinct learning curve. As participants valued ALI’s additional degrees of freedom, however, a future application of ALI could be for training purposes, ideally in combination with CLI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-10-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7819923/ /pubmed/33079238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle New Technology
Uysal, Daniel
Gasch, Claudia
Behnisch, Rouven
Nickel, Felix
Müller-Stich, Beat Peter
Hohenfellner, Markus
Teber, Dogu
Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title_full Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title_fullStr Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title_short Evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
title_sort evaluation of new motorized articulating laparoscopic instruments by laparoscopic novices using a standardized laparoscopic skills curriculum
topic New Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7819923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08086-2
work_keys_str_mv AT uysaldaniel evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT gaschclaudia evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT behnischrouven evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT nickelfelix evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT mullerstichbeatpeter evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT hohenfellnermarkus evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum
AT teberdogu evaluationofnewmotorizedarticulatinglaparoscopicinstrumentsbylaparoscopicnovicesusingastandardizedlaparoscopicskillscurriculum