Cargando…
Proposal and validation of a method to classify genetic subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease whose prognosis is associated with clinical features, cell-of-origin and genetic aberrations. Recent integrative, multi-omic analyses had led to identifying overlapping genetic DLBCL subtypes. We used targeted massive sequencing to ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80376-0 |
Sumario: | Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease whose prognosis is associated with clinical features, cell-of-origin and genetic aberrations. Recent integrative, multi-omic analyses had led to identifying overlapping genetic DLBCL subtypes. We used targeted massive sequencing to analyze 84 diagnostic samples from a multicenter cohort of patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab-containing therapies and a median follow-up of 6 years. The most frequently mutated genes were IGLL5 (43%), KMT2D (33.3%), CREBBP (28.6%), PIM1 (26.2%), and CARD11 (22.6%). Mutations in CD79B were associated with a higher risk of relapse after treatment, whereas patients with mutations in CD79B, ETS1, and CD58 had a significantly shorter survival. Based on the new genetic DLBCL classifications, we tested and validated a simplified method to classify samples in five genetic subtypes analyzing the mutational status of 26 genes and BCL2 and BCL6 translocations. We propose a two-step genetic DLBCL classifier (2-S), integrating the most significant features from previous algorithms, to classify the samples as N1(2-S), EZB(2-S), MCD(2-S), BN2(2-S), and ST2(2-S) groups. We determined its sensitivity and specificity, compared with the other established algorithms, and evaluated its clinical impact. The results showed that ST2(2-S) is the group with the best clinical outcome and N1(2-S), the more aggressive one. EZB(2-S) identified a subgroup with a worse prognosis among GCB-DLBLC cases. |
---|