Cargando…

Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort

The repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from CT scans need to be investigated to evaluate the temporal stability of imaging features with respect to a controlled scenario (test–retest), as well as their dependence on acquisition parameters such as slice thickness, or tub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, A. K., Mithun, S., Jaiswar, V., Sherkhane, U. B., Purandare, N. C., Prabhash, K., Rangarajan, V., Dekker, A., Wee, L., Traverso, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81526-8
_version_ 1783639121510531072
author Jha, A. K.
Mithun, S.
Jaiswar, V.
Sherkhane, U. B.
Purandare, N. C.
Prabhash, K.
Rangarajan, V.
Dekker, A.
Wee, L.
Traverso, A.
author_facet Jha, A. K.
Mithun, S.
Jaiswar, V.
Sherkhane, U. B.
Purandare, N. C.
Prabhash, K.
Rangarajan, V.
Dekker, A.
Wee, L.
Traverso, A.
author_sort Jha, A. K.
collection PubMed
description The repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from CT scans need to be investigated to evaluate the temporal stability of imaging features with respect to a controlled scenario (test–retest), as well as their dependence on acquisition parameters such as slice thickness, or tube current. Only robust and stable features should be used in prognostication/prediction models to improve generalizability across multiple institutions. In this study, we investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features with respect to three different scanners, variable slice thickness, tube current, and use of intravenous (IV) contrast medium, combining phantom studies and human subjects with non-small cell lung cancer. In all, half of the radiomic features showed good repeatability (ICC > 0.9) independent of scanner model. Within acquisition protocols, changes in slice thickness was associated with poorer reproducibility compared to the use of IV contrast. Broad feature classes exhibit different behaviors, with only few features appearing to be the most stable. 108 features presented both good repeatability and reproducibility in all the experiments, most of them being wavelet and Laplacian of Gaussian features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7820018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78200182021-01-22 Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort Jha, A. K. Mithun, S. Jaiswar, V. Sherkhane, U. B. Purandare, N. C. Prabhash, K. Rangarajan, V. Dekker, A. Wee, L. Traverso, A. Sci Rep Article The repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from CT scans need to be investigated to evaluate the temporal stability of imaging features with respect to a controlled scenario (test–retest), as well as their dependence on acquisition parameters such as slice thickness, or tube current. Only robust and stable features should be used in prognostication/prediction models to improve generalizability across multiple institutions. In this study, we investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features with respect to three different scanners, variable slice thickness, tube current, and use of intravenous (IV) contrast medium, combining phantom studies and human subjects with non-small cell lung cancer. In all, half of the radiomic features showed good repeatability (ICC > 0.9) independent of scanner model. Within acquisition protocols, changes in slice thickness was associated with poorer reproducibility compared to the use of IV contrast. Broad feature classes exhibit different behaviors, with only few features appearing to be the most stable. 108 features presented both good repeatability and reproducibility in all the experiments, most of them being wavelet and Laplacian of Gaussian features. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7820018/ /pubmed/33479392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81526-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jha, A. K.
Mithun, S.
Jaiswar, V.
Sherkhane, U. B.
Purandare, N. C.
Prabhash, K.
Rangarajan, V.
Dekker, A.
Wee, L.
Traverso, A.
Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title_full Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title_fullStr Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title_short Repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
title_sort repeatability and reproducibility study of radiomic features on a phantom and human cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81526-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jhaak repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT mithuns repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT jaiswarv repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT sherkhaneub repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT purandarenc repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT prabhashk repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT rangarajanv repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT dekkera repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT weel repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort
AT traversoa repeatabilityandreproducibilitystudyofradiomicfeaturesonaphantomandhumancohort