Cargando…

Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model

Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boes, Hanna, Brüstle, Sören, Danesh, Gholamreza, Zimmer, Stefan, Bizhang, Mozhgan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y
_version_ 1783639192147853312
author Boes, Hanna
Brüstle, Sören
Danesh, Gholamreza
Zimmer, Stefan
Bizhang, Mozhgan
author_facet Boes, Hanna
Brüstle, Sören
Danesh, Gholamreza
Zimmer, Stefan
Bizhang, Mozhgan
author_sort Boes, Hanna
collection PubMed
description Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7820349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78203492021-01-22 Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model Boes, Hanna Brüstle, Sören Danesh, Gholamreza Zimmer, Stefan Bizhang, Mozhgan Sci Rep Article Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7820349/ /pubmed/33479418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Boes, Hanna
Brüstle, Sören
Danesh, Gholamreza
Zimmer, Stefan
Bizhang, Mozhgan
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_full Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_fullStr Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_short Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_sort comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of airfloss ultra and i-prox sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33479418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y
work_keys_str_mv AT boeshanna comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT brustlesoren comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT daneshgholamreza comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT zimmerstefan comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT bizhangmozhgan comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel