Cargando…

Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN

In the nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN, 2590 archival formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues from 19 institutions were analyzed with two tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) panels at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)‐certi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuwata, Takeshi, Wakabayashi, Masashi, Hatanaka, Yutaka, Morii, Eiichi, Oda, Yoshinao, Taguchi, Kenichi, Noguchi, Masayuki, Ishikawa, Yuichi, Nakajima, Takashi, Sekine, Shigeki, Nomura, Shogo, Okamoto, Wataru, Fujii, Satoshi, Yoshino, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pin.13029
_version_ 1783639323537571840
author Kuwata, Takeshi
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Hatanaka, Yutaka
Morii, Eiichi
Oda, Yoshinao
Taguchi, Kenichi
Noguchi, Masayuki
Ishikawa, Yuichi
Nakajima, Takashi
Sekine, Shigeki
Nomura, Shogo
Okamoto, Wataru
Fujii, Satoshi
Yoshino, Takayuki
author_facet Kuwata, Takeshi
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Hatanaka, Yutaka
Morii, Eiichi
Oda, Yoshinao
Taguchi, Kenichi
Noguchi, Masayuki
Ishikawa, Yuichi
Nakajima, Takashi
Sekine, Shigeki
Nomura, Shogo
Okamoto, Wataru
Fujii, Satoshi
Yoshino, Takayuki
author_sort Kuwata, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description In the nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN, 2590 archival formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues from 19 institutions were analyzed with two tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) panels at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)‐certified College of American Pathologists (CAP)‐accredited central laboratory. The Oncomine Cancer Research Panel (OCP; 143 genes) succeeded in producing validated results for only 68.3% of the samples (%OCP‐success). CE‐IVD (25 genes) succeeded in 45.9% of the OCP‐failed samples, leading to an overall NGS success (%combined‐success) rate as high as 82.9%. Among 2573 samples, the DNA‐integrity (ΔC (t))‐high (ΔC (t) < 4.4, n = 1253) samples showed significantly higher %OCP‐ and %combined‐success rates (90.2% and 97.4%, respectively) than the DNA‐integrity‐intermediate (4.4 < ΔC (t) < 6.3, n = 911; 68.9% and 88.7%) and DNA‐integrity‐low ones (ΔC (t) > 6.3 or polymerase chain reaction‐failed, n = 409; 5.6% and 24.7%). Other factors associated with NGS success included the FFPE‐sample storage period (<4 years), the specimen type (surgical) and the primary tumor site (colorectal). Multivariable analysis revealed DNA integrity as the factor with the strongest independent association with NGS success, although it was suggested that other institution‐specific factors contribute to the discordance of inter‐institutional NGS success rates. Our results emphasize the importance of DNA quality in FFPE samples for NGS tests and the impact of DNA integrity on quality monitoring of pathology specimens for achieving successful NGS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7820973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78209732021-01-26 Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN Kuwata, Takeshi Wakabayashi, Masashi Hatanaka, Yutaka Morii, Eiichi Oda, Yoshinao Taguchi, Kenichi Noguchi, Masayuki Ishikawa, Yuichi Nakajima, Takashi Sekine, Shigeki Nomura, Shogo Okamoto, Wataru Fujii, Satoshi Yoshino, Takayuki Pathol Int Original Articles In the nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN, 2590 archival formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues from 19 institutions were analyzed with two tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) panels at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)‐certified College of American Pathologists (CAP)‐accredited central laboratory. The Oncomine Cancer Research Panel (OCP; 143 genes) succeeded in producing validated results for only 68.3% of the samples (%OCP‐success). CE‐IVD (25 genes) succeeded in 45.9% of the OCP‐failed samples, leading to an overall NGS success (%combined‐success) rate as high as 82.9%. Among 2573 samples, the DNA‐integrity (ΔC (t))‐high (ΔC (t) < 4.4, n = 1253) samples showed significantly higher %OCP‐ and %combined‐success rates (90.2% and 97.4%, respectively) than the DNA‐integrity‐intermediate (4.4 < ΔC (t) < 6.3, n = 911; 68.9% and 88.7%) and DNA‐integrity‐low ones (ΔC (t) > 6.3 or polymerase chain reaction‐failed, n = 409; 5.6% and 24.7%). Other factors associated with NGS success included the FFPE‐sample storage period (<4 years), the specimen type (surgical) and the primary tumor site (colorectal). Multivariable analysis revealed DNA integrity as the factor with the strongest independent association with NGS success, although it was suggested that other institution‐specific factors contribute to the discordance of inter‐institutional NGS success rates. Our results emphasize the importance of DNA quality in FFPE samples for NGS tests and the impact of DNA integrity on quality monitoring of pathology specimens for achieving successful NGS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-08 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7820973/ /pubmed/33030786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pin.13029 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pathology International published by Japanese Society of Pathology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kuwata, Takeshi
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Hatanaka, Yutaka
Morii, Eiichi
Oda, Yoshinao
Taguchi, Kenichi
Noguchi, Masayuki
Ishikawa, Yuichi
Nakajima, Takashi
Sekine, Shigeki
Nomura, Shogo
Okamoto, Wataru
Fujii, Satoshi
Yoshino, Takayuki
Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title_full Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title_fullStr Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title_full_unstemmed Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title_short Impact of DNA integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: Lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM‐Japan GI‐SCREEN
title_sort impact of dna integrity on the success rate of tissue‐based next‐generation sequencing: lessons from nationwide cancer genome screening project scrum‐japan gi‐screen
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7820973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33030786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pin.13029
work_keys_str_mv AT kuwatatakeshi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT wakabayashimasashi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT hatanakayutaka impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT moriieiichi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT odayoshinao impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT taguchikenichi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT noguchimasayuki impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT ishikawayuichi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT nakajimatakashi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT sekineshigeki impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT nomurashogo impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT okamotowataru impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT fujiisatoshi impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT yoshinotakayuki impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen
AT impactofdnaintegrityonthesuccessrateoftissuebasednextgenerationsequencinglessonsfromnationwidecancergenomescreeningprojectscrumjapangiscreen