Cargando…
A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study)
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare leak rate between hand‐sewn end‐to‐end anastomosis (ETE) and semi‐mechanical anastomosis (SMA) after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal surgical technique for creation of an anastomosis in the neck after esophagectomy is unc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.26209 |
_version_ | 1783639398767656960 |
---|---|
author | Nederlof, Nina Tilanus, Hugo W. de Vringer, Tahnee van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Willemsen, Sten P. Hop, Wim C. J. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. |
author_facet | Nederlof, Nina Tilanus, Hugo W. de Vringer, Tahnee van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Willemsen, Sten P. Hop, Wim C. J. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. |
author_sort | Nederlof, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare leak rate between hand‐sewn end‐to‐end anastomosis (ETE) and semi‐mechanical anastomosis (SMA) after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal surgical technique for creation of an anastomosis in the neck after esophagectomy is unclear. METHODS: Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical anastomosis were eligible for participation after written informed consent. Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was anastomotic leak rate defined as external drainage of saliva from the site of the anastomosis or intra‐thoracic manifestation of leak. Secondary endpoints included anastomotic stricture rate at one year follow up, number of endoscopic dilatations, dysphagia‐score, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were blinded for intervention. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and July 2014, 174 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to ETE (n = 44) or SMA (n = 49). Anastomotic leak occurred in 9 of 44 patients (20%) in the ETE group and 12 of 49 patients (24%) in the SMA group (absolute difference 4%, 95% CI −13% to +21%; p = .804). There was no significant difference in dysphagia at 1 year postoperatively (ETE 25% vs. SMA 20%; p = .628), in stricture rate (ETE 25% vs. 19% in SMA, p = .46), nor in median hospital stay (17 days in the ETE group, 13 days in the SMA group), morbidity (82% vs. 73%, p = .460) or mortality (0% vs. 4%, p = .175) between the groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7821322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78213222021-01-29 A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) Nederlof, Nina Tilanus, Hugo W. de Vringer, Tahnee van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Willemsen, Sten P. Hop, Wim C. J. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. J Surg Oncol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare leak rate between hand‐sewn end‐to‐end anastomosis (ETE) and semi‐mechanical anastomosis (SMA) after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal surgical technique for creation of an anastomosis in the neck after esophagectomy is unclear. METHODS: Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical anastomosis were eligible for participation after written informed consent. Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was anastomotic leak rate defined as external drainage of saliva from the site of the anastomosis or intra‐thoracic manifestation of leak. Secondary endpoints included anastomotic stricture rate at one year follow up, number of endoscopic dilatations, dysphagia‐score, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were blinded for intervention. RESULTS: Between August 2011 and July 2014, 174 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to ETE (n = 44) or SMA (n = 49). Anastomotic leak occurred in 9 of 44 patients (20%) in the ETE group and 12 of 49 patients (24%) in the SMA group (absolute difference 4%, 95% CI −13% to +21%; p = .804). There was no significant difference in dysphagia at 1 year postoperatively (ETE 25% vs. SMA 20%; p = .628), in stricture rate (ETE 25% vs. 19% in SMA, p = .46), nor in median hospital stay (17 days in the ETE group, 13 days in the SMA group), morbidity (82% vs. 73%, p = .460) or mortality (0% vs. 4%, p = .175) between the groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-28 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7821322/ /pubmed/32989770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.26209 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Nederlof, Nina Tilanus, Hugo W. de Vringer, Tahnee van Lanschot, Jan J. B. Willemsen, Sten P. Hop, Wim C. J. Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title | A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title_full | A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title_fullStr | A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title_short | A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE‐study) |
title_sort | single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi‐mechanical with hand‐sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (share‐study) |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.26209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nederlofnina asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT tilanushugow asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT devringertahnee asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT vanlanschotjanjb asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT willemsenstenp asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT hopwimcj asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT wijnhovenbaspl asingleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT nederlofnina singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT tilanushugow singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT devringertahnee singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT vanlanschotjanjb singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT willemsenstenp singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT hopwimcj singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy AT wijnhovenbaspl singleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingsemimechanicalwithhandsewncervicalanastomosisafteresophagectomyforcancersharestudy |