Cargando…

A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens

Classifying isolated vertebrate bones to a high level of taxonomic precision can be difficult. Many of Australia’s Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrate fossil-bearing deposits, for example, produce large numbers of isolated bones and very few associated or articulated skeletons. Identifying these often...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Matt A., Campione, Nicolás E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552712
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10545
_version_ 1783639493550538752
author White, Matt A.
Campione, Nicolás E.
author_facet White, Matt A.
Campione, Nicolás E.
author_sort White, Matt A.
collection PubMed
description Classifying isolated vertebrate bones to a high level of taxonomic precision can be difficult. Many of Australia’s Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrate fossil-bearing deposits, for example, produce large numbers of isolated bones and very few associated or articulated skeletons. Identifying these often fragmentary remains beyond high-level taxonomic ranks, such as Ornithopoda or Theropoda, is difficult and those classified to lower taxonomic levels are often debated. The ever-increasing accessibility to 3D-based comparative techniques has allowed palaeontologists to undertake a variety of shape analyses, such as geometric morphometrics, that although powerful and often ideal, require the recognition of diagnostic landmarks and the generation of sufficiently large data sets to detect clusters and accurately describe major components of morphological variation. As a result, such approaches are often outside the scope of basic palaeontological research that aims to simply identify fragmentary specimens. Herein we present a workflow in which pairwise comparisons between fragmentary fossils and better known exemplars are digitally achieved through three-dimensional mapping of their surface profiles and the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. To showcase this methodology, we compared a fragmentary theropod ungual (NMV P186153) from Victoria, Australia, identified as a neovenatorid, with the manual unguals of the megaraptoran Australovenator wintonensis (AODF604). We discovered that NMV P186153 was a near identical match to AODF604 manual ungual II-3, differing only in size, which, given their 10–15Ma age difference, suggests stasis in megaraptoran ungual morphology throughout this interval. Although useful, our approach is not free of subjectivity; care must be taken to eliminate the effects of broken and incomplete surfaces and identify the human errors incurred during scaling, such as through replication. Nevertheless, this approach will help to evaluate and identify fragmentary remains, adding a quantitative perspective to an otherwise qualitative endeavour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7821773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78217732021-02-04 A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens White, Matt A. Campione, Nicolás E. PeerJ Paleontology Classifying isolated vertebrate bones to a high level of taxonomic precision can be difficult. Many of Australia’s Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrate fossil-bearing deposits, for example, produce large numbers of isolated bones and very few associated or articulated skeletons. Identifying these often fragmentary remains beyond high-level taxonomic ranks, such as Ornithopoda or Theropoda, is difficult and those classified to lower taxonomic levels are often debated. The ever-increasing accessibility to 3D-based comparative techniques has allowed palaeontologists to undertake a variety of shape analyses, such as geometric morphometrics, that although powerful and often ideal, require the recognition of diagnostic landmarks and the generation of sufficiently large data sets to detect clusters and accurately describe major components of morphological variation. As a result, such approaches are often outside the scope of basic palaeontological research that aims to simply identify fragmentary specimens. Herein we present a workflow in which pairwise comparisons between fragmentary fossils and better known exemplars are digitally achieved through three-dimensional mapping of their surface profiles and the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. To showcase this methodology, we compared a fragmentary theropod ungual (NMV P186153) from Victoria, Australia, identified as a neovenatorid, with the manual unguals of the megaraptoran Australovenator wintonensis (AODF604). We discovered that NMV P186153 was a near identical match to AODF604 manual ungual II-3, differing only in size, which, given their 10–15Ma age difference, suggests stasis in megaraptoran ungual morphology throughout this interval. Although useful, our approach is not free of subjectivity; care must be taken to eliminate the effects of broken and incomplete surfaces and identify the human errors incurred during scaling, such as through replication. Nevertheless, this approach will help to evaluate and identify fragmentary remains, adding a quantitative perspective to an otherwise qualitative endeavour. PeerJ Inc. 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7821773/ /pubmed/33552712 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10545 Text en © 2021 White and Campione https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Paleontology
White, Matt A.
Campione, Nicolás E.
A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title_full A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title_fullStr A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title_full_unstemmed A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title_short A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
title_sort three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens
topic Paleontology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552712
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10545
work_keys_str_mv AT whitematta athreedimensionalapproachtovisualizepairwisemorphologicalvariationanditsapplicationtofragmentarypalaeontologicalspecimens
AT campionenicolase athreedimensionalapproachtovisualizepairwisemorphologicalvariationanditsapplicationtofragmentarypalaeontologicalspecimens
AT whitematta threedimensionalapproachtovisualizepairwisemorphologicalvariationanditsapplicationtofragmentarypalaeontologicalspecimens
AT campionenicolase threedimensionalapproachtovisualizepairwisemorphologicalvariationanditsapplicationtofragmentarypalaeontologicalspecimens