Cargando…
Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for...
Autor principal: | Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520041 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2014) -
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2018) -
Collaborative publishing: the difference between ‘gratis journals’ and ‘open access
journals’
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2015) -
Ethics and Responsibilities of Peer Reviewers to the Authors, Readers, and Editors
por: Min, Seung-Kee
Publicado: (2021) -
Peer review and publication delay
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2019)