Cargando…

Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to describe the composition of the hindgut microbiome in sheep and to test whether different husbandry conditions could have an effect in changing the composition and the diversity of the hindgut microbiome, based on the assumption that there is a known...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minozzi, Giulietta, Biscarini, Filippo, Dalla Costa, Emanuela, Chincarini, Matteo, Ferri, Nicola, Palestrini, Clara, Minero, Michela, Mazzola, Silvia, Piccinini, Renata, Vignola, Giorgio, Cannas, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11010004
_version_ 1783639577282478080
author Minozzi, Giulietta
Biscarini, Filippo
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Chincarini, Matteo
Ferri, Nicola
Palestrini, Clara
Minero, Michela
Mazzola, Silvia
Piccinini, Renata
Vignola, Giorgio
Cannas, Simona
author_facet Minozzi, Giulietta
Biscarini, Filippo
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Chincarini, Matteo
Ferri, Nicola
Palestrini, Clara
Minero, Michela
Mazzola, Silvia
Piccinini, Renata
Vignola, Giorgio
Cannas, Simona
author_sort Minozzi, Giulietta
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to describe the composition of the hindgut microbiome in sheep and to test whether different husbandry conditions could have an effect in changing the composition and the diversity of the hindgut microbiome, based on the assumption that there is a known influence between stress-related husbandry conditions and the gut microbiome. The results of our study demonstrated very few differences in the sheep hindgut microbiome, basically related to Verrucomicrobia abundance, when compared with previous studies. Additionally, the investigation of the interactions between microbiome and animal husbandry showed few indicators of difference between groups, which might indicate the presence of a low-level stress across the flock, depending on management procedures. Surely, this work represents a contribution for the analysis of the microbiome in animal production and welfare research. ABSTRACT: The microbiome is now seen as an important resource to understand animal health and welfare in many species. However, there are few studies aiming at identifying the association between fecal microbiome composition and husbandry conditions in sheep. A wide range of stressors associated with management and housing of animals increases the hypothalamic–pituitary axis activity, with growing evidence that the microbiome composition can be modified. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to describe the core microbiome in sheep, characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and to explore whether exposure to stressful husbandry conditions changed sheep hindgut microbiome composition. Sheep (n = 10) were divided in two groups: isolated group (individually separated for 3 h/day) and control group (housed in the home pen for the entire trial period). Sheep core microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes (43.6%), Bacteroidetes (30.38%), Proteobacteria (10.14%), and Verrucomicrobia (7.55%). Comparative results revealed few operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with significantly different relative abundance between groups. Chao1, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), and Fisher’s alpha indices did not show differences between groups. OTU-based Bray–Curtis distances between groups were not significant (p-value = 0.07). In conclusion, these results describing the core microbiome of sheep do not suggest a strong effect of stressful husbandry conditions on microbial composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78221952021-01-23 Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions Minozzi, Giulietta Biscarini, Filippo Dalla Costa, Emanuela Chincarini, Matteo Ferri, Nicola Palestrini, Clara Minero, Michela Mazzola, Silvia Piccinini, Renata Vignola, Giorgio Cannas, Simona Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to describe the composition of the hindgut microbiome in sheep and to test whether different husbandry conditions could have an effect in changing the composition and the diversity of the hindgut microbiome, based on the assumption that there is a known influence between stress-related husbandry conditions and the gut microbiome. The results of our study demonstrated very few differences in the sheep hindgut microbiome, basically related to Verrucomicrobia abundance, when compared with previous studies. Additionally, the investigation of the interactions between microbiome and animal husbandry showed few indicators of difference between groups, which might indicate the presence of a low-level stress across the flock, depending on management procedures. Surely, this work represents a contribution for the analysis of the microbiome in animal production and welfare research. ABSTRACT: The microbiome is now seen as an important resource to understand animal health and welfare in many species. However, there are few studies aiming at identifying the association between fecal microbiome composition and husbandry conditions in sheep. A wide range of stressors associated with management and housing of animals increases the hypothalamic–pituitary axis activity, with growing evidence that the microbiome composition can be modified. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to describe the core microbiome in sheep, characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and to explore whether exposure to stressful husbandry conditions changed sheep hindgut microbiome composition. Sheep (n = 10) were divided in two groups: isolated group (individually separated for 3 h/day) and control group (housed in the home pen for the entire trial period). Sheep core microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes (43.6%), Bacteroidetes (30.38%), Proteobacteria (10.14%), and Verrucomicrobia (7.55%). Comparative results revealed few operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with significantly different relative abundance between groups. Chao1, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), and Fisher’s alpha indices did not show differences between groups. OTU-based Bray–Curtis distances between groups were not significant (p-value = 0.07). In conclusion, these results describing the core microbiome of sheep do not suggest a strong effect of stressful husbandry conditions on microbial composition. MDPI 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822195/ /pubmed/33375098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11010004 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Minozzi, Giulietta
Biscarini, Filippo
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
Chincarini, Matteo
Ferri, Nicola
Palestrini, Clara
Minero, Michela
Mazzola, Silvia
Piccinini, Renata
Vignola, Giorgio
Cannas, Simona
Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title_full Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title_fullStr Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title_short Analysis of Hindgut Microbiome of Sheep and Effect of Different Husbandry Conditions
title_sort analysis of hindgut microbiome of sheep and effect of different husbandry conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11010004
work_keys_str_mv AT minozzigiulietta analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT biscarinifilippo analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT dallacostaemanuela analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT chincarinimatteo analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT ferrinicola analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT palestriniclara analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT mineromichela analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT mazzolasilvia analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT piccininirenata analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT vignolagiorgio analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions
AT cannassimona analysisofhindgutmicrobiomeofsheepandeffectofdifferenthusbandryconditions