Cargando…

Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels

The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ausems, Anne N. M. A., Skrzypek, Grzegorz, Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna, Jakubas, Dariusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756
_version_ 1783639602061377536
author Ausems, Anne N. M. A.
Skrzypek, Grzegorz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Jakubas, Dariusz
author_facet Ausems, Anne N. M. A.
Skrzypek, Grzegorz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Jakubas, Dariusz
author_sort Ausems, Anne N. M. A.
collection PubMed
description The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they face outside and within the breeding season. Here, we combined stable carbon (δ(13)C) and oxygen (δ(18)O) signatures of rectrices grown during the non-breeding period of two pairs of storm-petrel species breeding in the northern (European storm-petrel, Hydrobates pelagicus, ESP; Leach’s storm-petrel, Hydrobates leucorhous, LSP) and southern (black-bellied storm-petrel, Fregetta tropica, BBSP; Wilson’s storm-petrel, Oceanites oceanicus, WSP) hemispheres to determine differences in moulting ranges within and between species. To understand clustering patterns in δ(13)C and δ(18)O moulting signatures, we examined various variables: species, sexes, years, morphologies (feather growth rate, body mass, tarsus length, wing length) and δ(15)N. We found that different factors could explain the differences within and between the four species. We additionally employed a geographical distribution prediction model based on oceanic δ(13)C and δ(18)O isoscapes, combined with chlorophyll-a concentrations and observational data to predict potential moulting areas of the sampled feather type. The northern species were predicted to moult in temperate and tropical Atlantic zones. BBSP was predicted to moult on the southern hemisphere north of the Southern Ocean, while WSP was predicted to moult further North, including in the Arctic and northern Pacific. While moulting distribution can only be estimated on large geographical scales using δ(13)C and δ(18)O, validating predictive outcomes with food availability proxies and observational data may provide valuable insights into important moulting grounds. Establishing those, in turn, is important for conservation management of elusive pelagic seabirds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78222972021-01-29 Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels Ausems, Anne N. M. A. Skrzypek, Grzegorz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Jakubas, Dariusz PLoS One Research Article The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they face outside and within the breeding season. Here, we combined stable carbon (δ(13)C) and oxygen (δ(18)O) signatures of rectrices grown during the non-breeding period of two pairs of storm-petrel species breeding in the northern (European storm-petrel, Hydrobates pelagicus, ESP; Leach’s storm-petrel, Hydrobates leucorhous, LSP) and southern (black-bellied storm-petrel, Fregetta tropica, BBSP; Wilson’s storm-petrel, Oceanites oceanicus, WSP) hemispheres to determine differences in moulting ranges within and between species. To understand clustering patterns in δ(13)C and δ(18)O moulting signatures, we examined various variables: species, sexes, years, morphologies (feather growth rate, body mass, tarsus length, wing length) and δ(15)N. We found that different factors could explain the differences within and between the four species. We additionally employed a geographical distribution prediction model based on oceanic δ(13)C and δ(18)O isoscapes, combined with chlorophyll-a concentrations and observational data to predict potential moulting areas of the sampled feather type. The northern species were predicted to moult in temperate and tropical Atlantic zones. BBSP was predicted to moult on the southern hemisphere north of the Southern Ocean, while WSP was predicted to moult further North, including in the Arctic and northern Pacific. While moulting distribution can only be estimated on large geographical scales using δ(13)C and δ(18)O, validating predictive outcomes with food availability proxies and observational data may provide valuable insights into important moulting grounds. Establishing those, in turn, is important for conservation management of elusive pelagic seabirds. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822297/ /pubmed/33481938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756 Text en © 2021 Ausems et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ausems, Anne N. M. A.
Skrzypek, Grzegorz
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna
Jakubas, Dariusz
Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title_full Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title_fullStr Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title_full_unstemmed Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title_short Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
title_sort birds of a feather moult together: differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756
work_keys_str_mv AT ausemsannenma birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels
AT skrzypekgrzegorz birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels
AT wojczulanisjakubaskatarzyna birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels
AT jakubasdariusz birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels