Cargando…
Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels
The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756 |
_version_ | 1783639602061377536 |
---|---|
author | Ausems, Anne N. M. A. Skrzypek, Grzegorz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Jakubas, Dariusz |
author_facet | Ausems, Anne N. M. A. Skrzypek, Grzegorz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Jakubas, Dariusz |
author_sort | Ausems, Anne N. M. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they face outside and within the breeding season. Here, we combined stable carbon (δ(13)C) and oxygen (δ(18)O) signatures of rectrices grown during the non-breeding period of two pairs of storm-petrel species breeding in the northern (European storm-petrel, Hydrobates pelagicus, ESP; Leach’s storm-petrel, Hydrobates leucorhous, LSP) and southern (black-bellied storm-petrel, Fregetta tropica, BBSP; Wilson’s storm-petrel, Oceanites oceanicus, WSP) hemispheres to determine differences in moulting ranges within and between species. To understand clustering patterns in δ(13)C and δ(18)O moulting signatures, we examined various variables: species, sexes, years, morphologies (feather growth rate, body mass, tarsus length, wing length) and δ(15)N. We found that different factors could explain the differences within and between the four species. We additionally employed a geographical distribution prediction model based on oceanic δ(13)C and δ(18)O isoscapes, combined with chlorophyll-a concentrations and observational data to predict potential moulting areas of the sampled feather type. The northern species were predicted to moult in temperate and tropical Atlantic zones. BBSP was predicted to moult on the southern hemisphere north of the Southern Ocean, while WSP was predicted to moult further North, including in the Arctic and northern Pacific. While moulting distribution can only be estimated on large geographical scales using δ(13)C and δ(18)O, validating predictive outcomes with food availability proxies and observational data may provide valuable insights into important moulting grounds. Establishing those, in turn, is important for conservation management of elusive pelagic seabirds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7822297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78222972021-01-29 Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels Ausems, Anne N. M. A. Skrzypek, Grzegorz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Jakubas, Dariusz PLoS One Research Article The non-breeding period of pelagic seabirds, and particularly the moulting stage, is an important, but understudied part of their annual cycle as they are hardly accessible outside of the breeding period. Knowledge about the moulting ecology of seabirds is important to understand the challenges they face outside and within the breeding season. Here, we combined stable carbon (δ(13)C) and oxygen (δ(18)O) signatures of rectrices grown during the non-breeding period of two pairs of storm-petrel species breeding in the northern (European storm-petrel, Hydrobates pelagicus, ESP; Leach’s storm-petrel, Hydrobates leucorhous, LSP) and southern (black-bellied storm-petrel, Fregetta tropica, BBSP; Wilson’s storm-petrel, Oceanites oceanicus, WSP) hemispheres to determine differences in moulting ranges within and between species. To understand clustering patterns in δ(13)C and δ(18)O moulting signatures, we examined various variables: species, sexes, years, morphologies (feather growth rate, body mass, tarsus length, wing length) and δ(15)N. We found that different factors could explain the differences within and between the four species. We additionally employed a geographical distribution prediction model based on oceanic δ(13)C and δ(18)O isoscapes, combined with chlorophyll-a concentrations and observational data to predict potential moulting areas of the sampled feather type. The northern species were predicted to moult in temperate and tropical Atlantic zones. BBSP was predicted to moult on the southern hemisphere north of the Southern Ocean, while WSP was predicted to moult further North, including in the Arctic and northern Pacific. While moulting distribution can only be estimated on large geographical scales using δ(13)C and δ(18)O, validating predictive outcomes with food availability proxies and observational data may provide valuable insights into important moulting grounds. Establishing those, in turn, is important for conservation management of elusive pelagic seabirds. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822297/ /pubmed/33481938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756 Text en © 2021 Ausems et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ausems, Anne N. M. A. Skrzypek, Grzegorz Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Katarzyna Jakubas, Dariusz Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title | Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title_full | Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title_fullStr | Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title_full_unstemmed | Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title_short | Birds of a feather moult together: Differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
title_sort | birds of a feather moult together: differences in moulting distribution of four species of storm-petrels |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ausemsannenma birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels AT skrzypekgrzegorz birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels AT wojczulanisjakubaskatarzyna birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels AT jakubasdariusz birdsofafeathermoulttogetherdifferencesinmoultingdistributionoffourspeciesofstormpetrels |