Cargando…
Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments?
Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may b...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244932 |
_version_ | 1783639650689089536 |
---|---|
author | Hutto, David Barrett, Kyle |
author_facet | Hutto, David Barrett, Kyle |
author_sort | Hutto, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may be particularly important for amphibians, which represent one of the most endangered and least vagile vertebrate groups on earth. During the spring and summer of 2018, we conducted surveys to determine the presence of anurans at 51 wetland sites within the Piedmont ecoregion of South Carolina. Nearly one-third of these wetlands were located within urban open spaces, one-third in low development areas, and one-third in highly developed areas. Impervious surface and total road length surrounding the wetlands were measured at two scales, a core habitat scale (300 m) and average maximum migration scale (750 m), and we measured several within-wetland habitat variables. Urban Open Space wetlands had levels of surrounding impervious surface similar to High Urbanization wetlands at the larger scale and were intermediate between Low and High Urbanization wetlands at the smaller scale. The total length of road segments occurring within buffers (at both scales) surrounding our study wetlands was higher for Urban Open Space compared to Low and High Urbanization sites. Among the within-wetland variables measured, Low Urbanization sites had higher canopy cover and were more likely to have a terrestrial buffer zone relative to the other categories. Species richness decreased significantly as total road length increased among all wetlands. Wetland category was not a significant driver explaining species richness, but β-diversity was more variable among Urban Open Space wetlands than either Low or High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands did not appear to increase suitability for anurans relative to High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands had higher variability in species composition, which was perhaps attributable to the diversity among sites represented in the Urban Open Space category. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7822500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78225002021-01-29 Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? Hutto, David Barrett, Kyle PLoS One Research Article Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may be particularly important for amphibians, which represent one of the most endangered and least vagile vertebrate groups on earth. During the spring and summer of 2018, we conducted surveys to determine the presence of anurans at 51 wetland sites within the Piedmont ecoregion of South Carolina. Nearly one-third of these wetlands were located within urban open spaces, one-third in low development areas, and one-third in highly developed areas. Impervious surface and total road length surrounding the wetlands were measured at two scales, a core habitat scale (300 m) and average maximum migration scale (750 m), and we measured several within-wetland habitat variables. Urban Open Space wetlands had levels of surrounding impervious surface similar to High Urbanization wetlands at the larger scale and were intermediate between Low and High Urbanization wetlands at the smaller scale. The total length of road segments occurring within buffers (at both scales) surrounding our study wetlands was higher for Urban Open Space compared to Low and High Urbanization sites. Among the within-wetland variables measured, Low Urbanization sites had higher canopy cover and were more likely to have a terrestrial buffer zone relative to the other categories. Species richness decreased significantly as total road length increased among all wetlands. Wetland category was not a significant driver explaining species richness, but β-diversity was more variable among Urban Open Space wetlands than either Low or High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands did not appear to increase suitability for anurans relative to High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands had higher variability in species composition, which was perhaps attributable to the diversity among sites represented in the Urban Open Space category. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822500/ /pubmed/33481837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244932 Text en © 2021 Hutto, Barrett http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hutto, David Barrett, Kyle Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title | Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title_full | Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title_fullStr | Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title_short | Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
title_sort | do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huttodavid dourbanopenspacesproviderefugiaforfrogsinurbanenvironments AT barrettkyle dourbanopenspacesproviderefugiaforfrogsinurbanenvironments |