Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France

This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maunoury, Franck, Oury, Anaïs, Fortin, Sophie, Thomassin, Laetitia, Bohbot, Serge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652
_version_ 1783639664885760000
author Maunoury, Franck
Oury, Anaïs
Fortin, Sophie
Thomassin, Laetitia
Bohbot, Serge
author_facet Maunoury, Franck
Oury, Anaïs
Fortin, Sophie
Thomassin, Laetitia
Bohbot, Serge
author_sort Maunoury, Franck
collection PubMed
description This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYs(w/DFU)), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LY(w/DFU) and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LY(w/DFU), +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients’ health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78225472021-02-01 Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France Maunoury, Franck Oury, Anaïs Fortin, Sophie Thomassin, Laetitia Bohbot, Serge PLoS One Research Article This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYs(w/DFU)), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LY(w/DFU) and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LY(w/DFU), +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients’ health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822547/ /pubmed/33481840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652 Text en © 2021 Maunoury et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maunoury, Franck
Oury, Anaïs
Fortin, Sophie
Thomassin, Laetitia
Bohbot, Serge
Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title_full Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title_short Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
title_sort cost-effectiveness of tlc-nosf dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in france
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652
work_keys_str_mv AT maunouryfranck costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance
AT ouryanais costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance
AT fortinsophie costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance
AT thomassinlaetitia costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance
AT bohbotserge costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance
AT costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance