Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France
This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simula...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652 |
_version_ | 1783639664885760000 |
---|---|
author | Maunoury, Franck Oury, Anaïs Fortin, Sophie Thomassin, Laetitia Bohbot, Serge |
author_facet | Maunoury, Franck Oury, Anaïs Fortin, Sophie Thomassin, Laetitia Bohbot, Serge |
author_sort | Maunoury, Franck |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYs(w/DFU)), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LY(w/DFU) and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LY(w/DFU), +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients’ health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7822547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78225472021-02-01 Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France Maunoury, Franck Oury, Anaïs Fortin, Sophie Thomassin, Laetitia Bohbot, Serge PLoS One Research Article This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYs(w/DFU)), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LY(w/DFU) and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LY(w/DFU), +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients’ health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822547/ /pubmed/33481840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652 Text en © 2021 Maunoury et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maunoury, Franck Oury, Anaïs Fortin, Sophie Thomassin, Laetitia Bohbot, Serge Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title | Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of tlc-nosf dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in france |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maunouryfranck costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance AT ouryanais costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance AT fortinsophie costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance AT thomassinlaetitia costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance AT bohbotserge costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance AT costeffectivenessoftlcnosfdressingsversusneutraldressingsforthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersinfrance |