Cargando…

The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many Governments are instituting mobile tracking technologies to perform rapid contact tracing. However, these technologies are only effective if the public is willing to use them, implying that their perceived public health benefits must outweigh personal conce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrett, Paul M., White, Joshua P., Lewandowsky, Stephan, Kashima, Yoshihisa, Perfors, Andrew, Little, Daniel R., Geard, Nic, Mitchell, Lewis, Tomko, Martin, Dennis, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244827
_version_ 1783639667149635584
author Garrett, Paul M.
White, Joshua P.
Lewandowsky, Stephan
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Perfors, Andrew
Little, Daniel R.
Geard, Nic
Mitchell, Lewis
Tomko, Martin
Dennis, Simon
author_facet Garrett, Paul M.
White, Joshua P.
Lewandowsky, Stephan
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Perfors, Andrew
Little, Daniel R.
Geard, Nic
Mitchell, Lewis
Tomko, Martin
Dennis, Simon
author_sort Garrett, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many Governments are instituting mobile tracking technologies to perform rapid contact tracing. However, these technologies are only effective if the public is willing to use them, implying that their perceived public health benefits must outweigh personal concerns over privacy and security. The Australian federal government recently launched the ‘COVIDSafe’ app, designed to anonymously register nearby contacts. If a contact later identifies as infected with COVID-19, health department officials can rapidly followup with their registered contacts to stop the virus’ spread. The current study assessed attitudes towards three tracking technologies (telecommunication network tracking, a government app, and Apple and Google’s Bluetooth exposure notification system) in two representative samples of the Australian public prior to the launch of COVIDSafe. We compared these attitudes to usage of the COVIDSafe app after its launch in a further two representative samples of the Australian public. Using Bayesian methods, we find widespread acceptance for all tracking technologies, however, observe a large intention-behaviour gap between people’s stated attitudes and actual uptake of the COVIDSafe app. We consider the policy implications of these results for Australia and the world at large.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78225562021-02-01 The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia Garrett, Paul M. White, Joshua P. Lewandowsky, Stephan Kashima, Yoshihisa Perfors, Andrew Little, Daniel R. Geard, Nic Mitchell, Lewis Tomko, Martin Dennis, Simon PLoS One Research Article In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many Governments are instituting mobile tracking technologies to perform rapid contact tracing. However, these technologies are only effective if the public is willing to use them, implying that their perceived public health benefits must outweigh personal concerns over privacy and security. The Australian federal government recently launched the ‘COVIDSafe’ app, designed to anonymously register nearby contacts. If a contact later identifies as infected with COVID-19, health department officials can rapidly followup with their registered contacts to stop the virus’ spread. The current study assessed attitudes towards three tracking technologies (telecommunication network tracking, a government app, and Apple and Google’s Bluetooth exposure notification system) in two representative samples of the Australian public prior to the launch of COVIDSafe. We compared these attitudes to usage of the COVIDSafe app after its launch in a further two representative samples of the Australian public. Using Bayesian methods, we find widespread acceptance for all tracking technologies, however, observe a large intention-behaviour gap between people’s stated attitudes and actual uptake of the COVIDSafe app. We consider the policy implications of these results for Australia and the world at large. Public Library of Science 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7822556/ /pubmed/33481841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244827 Text en © 2021 Garrett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garrett, Paul M.
White, Joshua P.
Lewandowsky, Stephan
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Perfors, Andrew
Little, Daniel R.
Geard, Nic
Mitchell, Lewis
Tomko, Martin
Dennis, Simon
The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title_full The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title_fullStr The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title_full_unstemmed The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title_short The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia
title_sort acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for covid-19 in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244827
work_keys_str_mv AT garrettpaulm theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT whitejoshuap theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT lewandowskystephan theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT kashimayoshihisa theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT perforsandrew theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT littledanielr theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT geardnic theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT mitchelllewis theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT tomkomartin theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT dennissimon theacceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT garrettpaulm acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT whitejoshuap acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT lewandowskystephan acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT kashimayoshihisa acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT perforsandrew acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT littledanielr acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT geardnic acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT mitchelllewis acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT tomkomartin acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia
AT dennissimon acceptabilityanduptakeofsmartphonetrackingforcovid19inaustralia