Cargando…
The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382 |
_version_ | 1783639692901613568 |
---|---|
author | Martin-Key, Nayra A Schei, Thea S Barker, Eleanor J Spadaro, Benedetta Funnell, Erin Benacek, Jiri Tomasik, Jakub Bahn, Sabine |
author_facet | Martin-Key, Nayra A Schei, Thea S Barker, Eleanor J Spadaro, Benedetta Funnell, Erin Benacek, Jiri Tomasik, Jakub Bahn, Sabine |
author_sort | Martin-Key, Nayra A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. RESULTS: The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25382 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7822724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78227242021-01-26 The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Martin-Key, Nayra A Schei, Thea S Barker, Eleanor J Spadaro, Benedetta Funnell, Erin Benacek, Jiri Tomasik, Jakub Bahn, Sabine JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. RESULTS: The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25382 JMIR Publications 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7822724/ /pubmed/33416508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382 Text en ©Nayra A Martin-Key, Thea S Schei, Eleanor J Barker, Benedetta Spadaro, Erin Funnell, Jiri Benacek, Jakub Tomasik, Sabine Bahn. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Martin-Key, Nayra A Schei, Thea S Barker, Eleanor J Spadaro, Benedetta Funnell, Erin Benacek, Jiri Tomasik, Jakub Bahn, Sabine The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | current state and diagnostic accuracy of digital mental health assessment tools for psychiatric disorders: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinkeynayraa thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT scheitheas thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barkereleanorj thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT spadarobenedetta thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT funnellerin thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT benacekjiri thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tomasikjakub thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bahnsabine thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT martinkeynayraa currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT scheitheas currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barkereleanorj currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT spadarobenedetta currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT funnellerin currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT benacekjiri currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tomasikjakub currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bahnsabine currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |