Cargando…

The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Key, Nayra A, Schei, Thea S, Barker, Eleanor J, Spadaro, Benedetta, Funnell, Erin, Benacek, Jiri, Tomasik, Jakub, Bahn, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382
_version_ 1783639692901613568
author Martin-Key, Nayra A
Schei, Thea S
Barker, Eleanor J
Spadaro, Benedetta
Funnell, Erin
Benacek, Jiri
Tomasik, Jakub
Bahn, Sabine
author_facet Martin-Key, Nayra A
Schei, Thea S
Barker, Eleanor J
Spadaro, Benedetta
Funnell, Erin
Benacek, Jiri
Tomasik, Jakub
Bahn, Sabine
author_sort Martin-Key, Nayra A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. RESULTS: The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25382
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78227242021-01-26 The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Martin-Key, Nayra A Schei, Thea S Barker, Eleanor J Spadaro, Benedetta Funnell, Erin Benacek, Jiri Tomasik, Jakub Bahn, Sabine JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. RESULTS: The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/25382 JMIR Publications 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7822724/ /pubmed/33416508 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382 Text en ©Nayra A Martin-Key, Thea S Schei, Eleanor J Barker, Benedetta Spadaro, Erin Funnell, Jiri Benacek, Jakub Tomasik, Sabine Bahn. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 08.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Martin-Key, Nayra A
Schei, Thea S
Barker, Eleanor J
Spadaro, Benedetta
Funnell, Erin
Benacek, Jiri
Tomasik, Jakub
Bahn, Sabine
The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort current state and diagnostic accuracy of digital mental health assessment tools for psychiatric disorders: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33416508
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25382
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkeynayraa thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scheitheas thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barkereleanorj thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT spadarobenedetta thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT funnellerin thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benacekjiri thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomasikjakub thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bahnsabine thecurrentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinkeynayraa currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scheitheas currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barkereleanorj currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT spadarobenedetta currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT funnellerin currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benacekjiri currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomasikjakub currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bahnsabine currentstateanddiagnosticaccuracyofdigitalmentalhealthassessmenttoolsforpsychiatricdisordersprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis