Cargando…

Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions

Matricaria chamomilla L. (GRIN; The Plant List 2013) is an important medicinal plant and one of the most frequently consumed tea plants. In order to assess mitochondrial genome variation of different cultivated chamomile accessions, 36 mitochondrial SNP markers were used in a HRM (high resolution me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruzicka, Joana, Hacek, Marion, Novak, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13353-020-00602-3
_version_ 1783639703719772160
author Ruzicka, Joana
Hacek, Marion
Novak, Johannes
author_facet Ruzicka, Joana
Hacek, Marion
Novak, Johannes
author_sort Ruzicka, Joana
collection PubMed
description Matricaria chamomilla L. (GRIN; The Plant List 2013) is an important medicinal plant and one of the most frequently consumed tea plants. In order to assess mitochondrial genome variation of different cultivated chamomile accessions, 36 mitochondrial SNP markers were used in a HRM (high resolution melting) approach. In thirteen accessions of chamomile (n = 155), twenty mitochondrial haplotypes (genetic distances 0.028–0.693) were identified. Three of the accessions (‘Camoflora’, ‘Mat19’ and ‘Manzana’) were monomorphic. The highest genotypic variability was found for the Croatian accession ‘PG029’ with nine mitochondrial haplotypes (mitotypes) and the Argentinian ‘Argenmilla’ with seven mitotypes. However, most of the mitotypes detected in these accessions were infrequent in our sample set, thus disclosing an unusual high amount of substitutions within the mitochondrial genome of these accessions. The mitotypes with the highest frequency in the examined dataset were MT1 (n = 27), MT9 (n = 23) and MT17 (n = 20). All of the frequent mitochondrial lines are distributed not only over several accessions but also over several geographical origins. The origins often build a triplet with on average two to three concurrent lines. The most distantly related accessions were ‘Mat19’ and ‘Camoflora’ (0.539), while ‘PNOS’ and ‘Margaritar’ (0.007) showed the lowest genetic distance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13353-020-00602-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78227862021-02-11 Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions Ruzicka, Joana Hacek, Marion Novak, Johannes J Appl Genet Plant Genetics • Original Paper Matricaria chamomilla L. (GRIN; The Plant List 2013) is an important medicinal plant and one of the most frequently consumed tea plants. In order to assess mitochondrial genome variation of different cultivated chamomile accessions, 36 mitochondrial SNP markers were used in a HRM (high resolution melting) approach. In thirteen accessions of chamomile (n = 155), twenty mitochondrial haplotypes (genetic distances 0.028–0.693) were identified. Three of the accessions (‘Camoflora’, ‘Mat19’ and ‘Manzana’) were monomorphic. The highest genotypic variability was found for the Croatian accession ‘PG029’ with nine mitochondrial haplotypes (mitotypes) and the Argentinian ‘Argenmilla’ with seven mitotypes. However, most of the mitotypes detected in these accessions were infrequent in our sample set, thus disclosing an unusual high amount of substitutions within the mitochondrial genome of these accessions. The mitotypes with the highest frequency in the examined dataset were MT1 (n = 27), MT9 (n = 23) and MT17 (n = 20). All of the frequent mitochondrial lines are distributed not only over several accessions but also over several geographical origins. The origins often build a triplet with on average two to three concurrent lines. The most distantly related accessions were ‘Mat19’ and ‘Camoflora’ (0.539), while ‘PNOS’ and ‘Margaritar’ (0.007) showed the lowest genetic distance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13353-020-00602-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7822786/ /pubmed/33294951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13353-020-00602-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Plant Genetics • Original Paper
Ruzicka, Joana
Hacek, Marion
Novak, Johannes
Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title_full Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title_fullStr Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title_full_unstemmed Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title_short Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
title_sort mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions
topic Plant Genetics • Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13353-020-00602-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ruzickajoana mitochondrialrelationshipsbetweenvariouschamomileaccessions
AT hacekmarion mitochondrialrelationshipsbetweenvariouschamomileaccessions
AT novakjohannes mitochondrialrelationshipsbetweenvariouschamomileaccessions