Cargando…

Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: The eHealth self-management application ‘Oncokompas’ was developed to support cancer survivors in monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms, and obtaining personalized feedback and options for supportive care. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility of Onco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Hout, A., Jansen, F., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Coupé, V. M., Holtmaat, K., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A., Hardillo, J. A., de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg, Tiren-Verbeet, N. L., Sommeijer, D. W., de Heer, K., Schaar, C. G., Sedee, R. J. E., Bosscha, K., van den Brekel, M. W. M., Petersen, J. F., Westerman, M., Honings, J., Takes, R. P., Houtenbos, I., van den Broek, W. T., de Bree, R., Jansen, P., Eerenstein, S. E. J., Leemans, C. R., Zijlstra, J. M., Cuijpers, P., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9
_version_ 1783639705434193920
author van der Hout, A.
Jansen, F.
van Uden-Kraan, C. F.
Coupé, V. M.
Holtmaat, K.
Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A.
Hardillo, J. A.
de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg
Tiren-Verbeet, N. L.
Sommeijer, D. W.
de Heer, K.
Schaar, C. G.
Sedee, R. J. E.
Bosscha, K.
van den Brekel, M. W. M.
Petersen, J. F.
Westerman, M.
Honings, J.
Takes, R. P.
Houtenbos, I.
van den Broek, W. T.
de Bree, R.
Jansen, P.
Eerenstein, S. E. J.
Leemans, C. R.
Zijlstra, J. M.
Cuijpers, P.
van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
author_facet van der Hout, A.
Jansen, F.
van Uden-Kraan, C. F.
Coupé, V. M.
Holtmaat, K.
Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A.
Hardillo, J. A.
de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg
Tiren-Verbeet, N. L.
Sommeijer, D. W.
de Heer, K.
Schaar, C. G.
Sedee, R. J. E.
Bosscha, K.
van den Brekel, M. W. M.
Petersen, J. F.
Westerman, M.
Honings, J.
Takes, R. P.
Houtenbos, I.
van den Broek, W. T.
de Bree, R.
Jansen, P.
Eerenstein, S. E. J.
Leemans, C. R.
Zijlstra, J. M.
Cuijpers, P.
van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
author_sort van der Hout, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The eHealth self-management application ‘Oncokompas’ was developed to support cancer survivors in monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms, and obtaining personalized feedback and options for supportive care. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility of Oncokompas compared with care as usual (CAU) among cancer survivors. METHODS: Survivors were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Direct (non-)medical, indirect non-medical costs, and HRQOL were measured at 3- and 6-month follow-up, using iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Costs and the EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Mean cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between both groups. RESULTS: In total, 625 survivors were randomized into intervention (n = 320) or control group (n = 305). Base case analysis showed that incremental costs from a societal perspective were − €163 (95% CI, − 665 to 326), and incremental QALYs were 0.0017 (95% CI, − 0.0121 to 0.0155) in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. The probability that, compared with CAU, Oncokompas is more effective was 60%, less costly 73%, and both more effective and less costly 47%. Sensitivity analyses showed that incremental costs vary between − €40 and €69, and incremental QALYs vary between − 0.0023 and − 0.0057. CONCLUSION: Oncokompas is likely to be equally effective on utilities, and not more expensive than CAU, and will therefore contribute to sustainable cancer survivorship care in a (cost-)effective manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Oncokompas seems to improve HRQOL and reduces the burden of several tumour-specific symptoms, while costs from a societal perspective are similar to CAU. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7822793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78227932021-02-11 Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial van der Hout, A. Jansen, F. van Uden-Kraan, C. F. Coupé, V. M. Holtmaat, K. Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. Hardillo, J. A. de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg Tiren-Verbeet, N. L. Sommeijer, D. W. de Heer, K. Schaar, C. G. Sedee, R. J. E. Bosscha, K. van den Brekel, M. W. M. Petersen, J. F. Westerman, M. Honings, J. Takes, R. P. Houtenbos, I. van den Broek, W. T. de Bree, R. Jansen, P. Eerenstein, S. E. J. Leemans, C. R. Zijlstra, J. M. Cuijpers, P. van de Poll-Franse, L. V. Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: The eHealth self-management application ‘Oncokompas’ was developed to support cancer survivors in monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms, and obtaining personalized feedback and options for supportive care. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility of Oncokompas compared with care as usual (CAU) among cancer survivors. METHODS: Survivors were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Direct (non-)medical, indirect non-medical costs, and HRQOL were measured at 3- and 6-month follow-up, using iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Costs and the EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Mean cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between both groups. RESULTS: In total, 625 survivors were randomized into intervention (n = 320) or control group (n = 305). Base case analysis showed that incremental costs from a societal perspective were − €163 (95% CI, − 665 to 326), and incremental QALYs were 0.0017 (95% CI, − 0.0121 to 0.0155) in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. The probability that, compared with CAU, Oncokompas is more effective was 60%, less costly 73%, and both more effective and less costly 47%. Sensitivity analyses showed that incremental costs vary between − €40 and €69, and incremental QALYs vary between − 0.0023 and − 0.0057. CONCLUSION: Oncokompas is likely to be equally effective on utilities, and not more expensive than CAU, and will therefore contribute to sustainable cancer survivorship care in a (cost-)effective manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Oncokompas seems to improve HRQOL and reduces the burden of several tumour-specific symptoms, while costs from a societal perspective are similar to CAU. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7822793/ /pubmed/32656739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van der Hout, A.
Jansen, F.
van Uden-Kraan, C. F.
Coupé, V. M.
Holtmaat, K.
Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A.
Hardillo, J. A.
de Jong, R. J. Baatenburg
Tiren-Verbeet, N. L.
Sommeijer, D. W.
de Heer, K.
Schaar, C. G.
Sedee, R. J. E.
Bosscha, K.
van den Brekel, M. W. M.
Petersen, J. F.
Westerman, M.
Honings, J.
Takes, R. P.
Houtenbos, I.
van den Broek, W. T.
de Bree, R.
Jansen, P.
Eerenstein, S. E. J.
Leemans, C. R.
Zijlstra, J. M.
Cuijpers, P.
van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost-utility of an eHealth application ‘Oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost-utility of an ehealth application ‘oncokompas’ that supports cancer survivors in self-management: results of a randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7822793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00912-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderhouta costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jansenf costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanudenkraancf costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT coupevm costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holtmaatk costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nieuwenhuijzenga costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hardilloja costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dejongrjbaatenburg costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tirenverbeetnl costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sommeijerdw costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deheerk costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schaarcg costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sedeerje costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bosschak costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbrekelmwm costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT petersenjf costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westermanm costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT honingsj costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT takesrp costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT houtenbosi costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbroekwt costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT debreer costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jansenp costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eerensteinsej costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leemanscr costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zijlstrajm costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cuijpersp costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandepollfranselv costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verdonckdeleeuwim costutilityofanehealthapplicationoncokompasthatsupportscancersurvivorsinselfmanagementresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial