Cargando…

Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging

Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardo, Cesare, Cannella, Roberto, D’Angelo, Costanza, Toia, Patrizia, Salvaggio, Giuseppe, Feraco, Paola, Marrale, Maurizio, Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo, D’Amelio, Marco, La Tona, Giuseppe, La Grutta, Ludovico, Midiri, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046
_version_ 1783639850020241408
author Gagliardo, Cesare
Cannella, Roberto
D’Angelo, Costanza
Toia, Patrizia
Salvaggio, Giuseppe
Feraco, Paola
Marrale, Maurizio
Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo
D’Amelio, Marco
La Tona, Giuseppe
La Grutta, Ludovico
Midiri, Massimo
author_facet Gagliardo, Cesare
Cannella, Roberto
D’Angelo, Costanza
Toia, Patrizia
Salvaggio, Giuseppe
Feraco, Paola
Marrale, Maurizio
Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo
D’Amelio, Marco
La Tona, Giuseppe
La Grutta, Ludovico
Midiri, Massimo
author_sort Gagliardo, Cesare
collection PubMed
description Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil in tcMRgFUS thalamotomy using 1.5-T MR scanner. Methods: This prospective study included adult patients undergoing tcMRgFUS for treatment of essential tremor. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE sequences were acquired after the last high-energy sonication using a dedicated two-channel FUS-Head (2ch-FUS) coil and body radiofrequency (body-RF) coil. Postoperative follow-ups were performed at 48 h using an eight-channel phased-array (8ch-HEAD) coil. Two readers independently assessed the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and evaluated the presence of concentric lesional zones (zone I, II and III). Intraindividual differences in SNR and lesional findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and McNemar test. Results: Eight patients underwent tcMRgFUS thalamotomy. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE images acquired using the 2ch-FUS coil demonstrated significantly higher SNR (R1 median SNR: 10.54; R2: 9.52) compared to the body-RF coil (R1: 2.96, p < 0.001; R2: 2.99, p < 0.001). The SNR was lower compared to the 48-h follow-up (p < 0.001 for both readers). Intraoperative zone I and zone II were more commonly visualized using the 2ch-FUS coil (R1, p = 0.031 and p = 0.008, R2, p = 0.016, p = 0.008), without significant differences with 48-h follow-up (p ≥ 0.063). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for both SNR (ICC: 0.85) and lesional findings (k: 0.82–0.91). Conclusions: In the study population, the dedicated 2ch-FUS coil significantly improved the SNR and visualization of lesional zones on intraoperative imaging during tcMRgFUS performed with a 1.5-T MR scanner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7823499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78234992021-01-24 Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging Gagliardo, Cesare Cannella, Roberto D’Angelo, Costanza Toia, Patrizia Salvaggio, Giuseppe Feraco, Paola Marrale, Maurizio Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo D’Amelio, Marco La Tona, Giuseppe La Grutta, Ludovico Midiri, Massimo Brain Sci Article Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil in tcMRgFUS thalamotomy using 1.5-T MR scanner. Methods: This prospective study included adult patients undergoing tcMRgFUS for treatment of essential tremor. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE sequences were acquired after the last high-energy sonication using a dedicated two-channel FUS-Head (2ch-FUS) coil and body radiofrequency (body-RF) coil. Postoperative follow-ups were performed at 48 h using an eight-channel phased-array (8ch-HEAD) coil. Two readers independently assessed the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and evaluated the presence of concentric lesional zones (zone I, II and III). Intraindividual differences in SNR and lesional findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and McNemar test. Results: Eight patients underwent tcMRgFUS thalamotomy. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE images acquired using the 2ch-FUS coil demonstrated significantly higher SNR (R1 median SNR: 10.54; R2: 9.52) compared to the body-RF coil (R1: 2.96, p < 0.001; R2: 2.99, p < 0.001). The SNR was lower compared to the 48-h follow-up (p < 0.001 for both readers). Intraoperative zone I and zone II were more commonly visualized using the 2ch-FUS coil (R1, p = 0.031 and p = 0.008, R2, p = 0.016, p = 0.008), without significant differences with 48-h follow-up (p ≥ 0.063). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for both SNR (ICC: 0.85) and lesional findings (k: 0.82–0.91). Conclusions: In the study population, the dedicated 2ch-FUS coil significantly improved the SNR and visualization of lesional zones on intraoperative imaging during tcMRgFUS performed with a 1.5-T MR scanner. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7823499/ /pubmed/33406708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gagliardo, Cesare
Cannella, Roberto
D’Angelo, Costanza
Toia, Patrizia
Salvaggio, Giuseppe
Feraco, Paola
Marrale, Maurizio
Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo
D’Amelio, Marco
La Tona, Giuseppe
La Grutta, Ludovico
Midiri, Massimo
Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title_full Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title_fullStr Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title_short Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
title_sort transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound with a 1.5 tesla scanner: a prospective intraindividual comparison study of intraoperative imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardocesare transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT cannellaroberto transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT dangelocostanza transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT toiapatrizia transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT salvaggiogiuseppe transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT feracopaola transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT marralemaurizio transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT iacopinodomenicogerardo transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT dameliomarco transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT latonagiuseppe transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT lagruttaludovico transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging
AT midirimassimo transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging