Cargando…
Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging
Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046 |
_version_ | 1783639850020241408 |
---|---|
author | Gagliardo, Cesare Cannella, Roberto D’Angelo, Costanza Toia, Patrizia Salvaggio, Giuseppe Feraco, Paola Marrale, Maurizio Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo D’Amelio, Marco La Tona, Giuseppe La Grutta, Ludovico Midiri, Massimo |
author_facet | Gagliardo, Cesare Cannella, Roberto D’Angelo, Costanza Toia, Patrizia Salvaggio, Giuseppe Feraco, Paola Marrale, Maurizio Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo D’Amelio, Marco La Tona, Giuseppe La Grutta, Ludovico Midiri, Massimo |
author_sort | Gagliardo, Cesare |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil in tcMRgFUS thalamotomy using 1.5-T MR scanner. Methods: This prospective study included adult patients undergoing tcMRgFUS for treatment of essential tremor. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE sequences were acquired after the last high-energy sonication using a dedicated two-channel FUS-Head (2ch-FUS) coil and body radiofrequency (body-RF) coil. Postoperative follow-ups were performed at 48 h using an eight-channel phased-array (8ch-HEAD) coil. Two readers independently assessed the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and evaluated the presence of concentric lesional zones (zone I, II and III). Intraindividual differences in SNR and lesional findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and McNemar test. Results: Eight patients underwent tcMRgFUS thalamotomy. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE images acquired using the 2ch-FUS coil demonstrated significantly higher SNR (R1 median SNR: 10.54; R2: 9.52) compared to the body-RF coil (R1: 2.96, p < 0.001; R2: 2.99, p < 0.001). The SNR was lower compared to the 48-h follow-up (p < 0.001 for both readers). Intraoperative zone I and zone II were more commonly visualized using the 2ch-FUS coil (R1, p = 0.031 and p = 0.008, R2, p = 0.016, p = 0.008), without significant differences with 48-h follow-up (p ≥ 0.063). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for both SNR (ICC: 0.85) and lesional findings (k: 0.82–0.91). Conclusions: In the study population, the dedicated 2ch-FUS coil significantly improved the SNR and visualization of lesional zones on intraoperative imaging during tcMRgFUS performed with a 1.5-T MR scanner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7823499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78234992021-01-24 Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging Gagliardo, Cesare Cannella, Roberto D’Angelo, Costanza Toia, Patrizia Salvaggio, Giuseppe Feraco, Paola Marrale, Maurizio Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo D’Amelio, Marco La Tona, Giuseppe La Grutta, Ludovico Midiri, Massimo Brain Sci Article Background: High-quality intraoperative imaging is needed for optimal monitoring of patients undergoing transcranial MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) thalamotomy. In this paper, we compare the intraoperative imaging obtained with dedicated FUS-Head coil and standard body radiofrequency coil in tcMRgFUS thalamotomy using 1.5-T MR scanner. Methods: This prospective study included adult patients undergoing tcMRgFUS for treatment of essential tremor. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE sequences were acquired after the last high-energy sonication using a dedicated two-channel FUS-Head (2ch-FUS) coil and body radiofrequency (body-RF) coil. Postoperative follow-ups were performed at 48 h using an eight-channel phased-array (8ch-HEAD) coil. Two readers independently assessed the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and evaluated the presence of concentric lesional zones (zone I, II and III). Intraindividual differences in SNR and lesional findings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and McNemar test. Results: Eight patients underwent tcMRgFUS thalamotomy. Intraoperative T2-weighted FRFSE images acquired using the 2ch-FUS coil demonstrated significantly higher SNR (R1 median SNR: 10.54; R2: 9.52) compared to the body-RF coil (R1: 2.96, p < 0.001; R2: 2.99, p < 0.001). The SNR was lower compared to the 48-h follow-up (p < 0.001 for both readers). Intraoperative zone I and zone II were more commonly visualized using the 2ch-FUS coil (R1, p = 0.031 and p = 0.008, R2, p = 0.016, p = 0.008), without significant differences with 48-h follow-up (p ≥ 0.063). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for both SNR (ICC: 0.85) and lesional findings (k: 0.82–0.91). Conclusions: In the study population, the dedicated 2ch-FUS coil significantly improved the SNR and visualization of lesional zones on intraoperative imaging during tcMRgFUS performed with a 1.5-T MR scanner. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7823499/ /pubmed/33406708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gagliardo, Cesare Cannella, Roberto D’Angelo, Costanza Toia, Patrizia Salvaggio, Giuseppe Feraco, Paola Marrale, Maurizio Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo D’Amelio, Marco La Tona, Giuseppe La Grutta, Ludovico Midiri, Massimo Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title | Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title_full | Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title_fullStr | Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title_short | Transcranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound with a 1.5 Tesla Scanner: A Prospective Intraindividual Comparison Study of Intraoperative Imaging |
title_sort | transcranial magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound with a 1.5 tesla scanner: a prospective intraindividual comparison study of intraoperative imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagliardocesare transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT cannellaroberto transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT dangelocostanza transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT toiapatrizia transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT salvaggiogiuseppe transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT feracopaola transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT marralemaurizio transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT iacopinodomenicogerardo transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT dameliomarco transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT latonagiuseppe transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT lagruttaludovico transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging AT midirimassimo transcranialmagneticresonanceimagingguidedfocusedultrasoundwitha15teslascanneraprospectiveintraindividualcomparisonstudyofintraoperativeimaging |