Cargando…

Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface

Studies so far have analyzed the effect of distractor stimuli in different types of brain–computer interface (BCI). However, the effect of a background speech has not been studied using an auditory event-related potential (ERP-BCI), a convenient option when the visual path cannot be adopted by users...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro, Ron-Angevin, Ricardo, Sanz-Arigita, Ernesto J., Parize, Antoine, Esquirol, Juliette, Perrier, Alban, Laur, Simon, André, Jean-Marc, Lespinet-Najib, Véronique, Garcia, Liliana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010039
_version_ 1783639929393250304
author Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro
Ron-Angevin, Ricardo
Sanz-Arigita, Ernesto J.
Parize, Antoine
Esquirol, Juliette
Perrier, Alban
Laur, Simon
André, Jean-Marc
Lespinet-Najib, Véronique
Garcia, Liliana
author_facet Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro
Ron-Angevin, Ricardo
Sanz-Arigita, Ernesto J.
Parize, Antoine
Esquirol, Juliette
Perrier, Alban
Laur, Simon
André, Jean-Marc
Lespinet-Najib, Véronique
Garcia, Liliana
author_sort Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro
collection PubMed
description Studies so far have analyzed the effect of distractor stimuli in different types of brain–computer interface (BCI). However, the effect of a background speech has not been studied using an auditory event-related potential (ERP-BCI), a convenient option when the visual path cannot be adopted by users. Thus, the aim of the present work is to examine the impact of a background speech on selection performance and user workload in auditory BCI systems. Eleven participants tested three conditions: (i) auditory BCI control condition, (ii) auditory BCI with a background speech to ignore (non-attentional condition), and (iii) auditory BCI while the user has to pay attention to the background speech (attentional condition). The results demonstrated that, despite no significant differences in performance, shared attention to auditory BCI and background speech required a higher cognitive workload. In addition, the P300 target stimuli in the non-attentional condition were significantly higher than those in the attentional condition for several channels. The non-attentional condition was the only condition that showed significant differences in the amplitude of the P300 between target and non-target stimuli. The present study indicates that background speech, especially when it is attended to, is an important interference that should be avoided while using an auditory BCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7823829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78238292021-01-24 Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro Ron-Angevin, Ricardo Sanz-Arigita, Ernesto J. Parize, Antoine Esquirol, Juliette Perrier, Alban Laur, Simon André, Jean-Marc Lespinet-Najib, Véronique Garcia, Liliana Brain Sci Article Studies so far have analyzed the effect of distractor stimuli in different types of brain–computer interface (BCI). However, the effect of a background speech has not been studied using an auditory event-related potential (ERP-BCI), a convenient option when the visual path cannot be adopted by users. Thus, the aim of the present work is to examine the impact of a background speech on selection performance and user workload in auditory BCI systems. Eleven participants tested three conditions: (i) auditory BCI control condition, (ii) auditory BCI with a background speech to ignore (non-attentional condition), and (iii) auditory BCI while the user has to pay attention to the background speech (attentional condition). The results demonstrated that, despite no significant differences in performance, shared attention to auditory BCI and background speech required a higher cognitive workload. In addition, the P300 target stimuli in the non-attentional condition were significantly higher than those in the attentional condition for several channels. The non-attentional condition was the only condition that showed significant differences in the amplitude of the P300 between target and non-target stimuli. The present study indicates that background speech, especially when it is attended to, is an important interference that should be avoided while using an auditory BCI. MDPI 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7823829/ /pubmed/33401410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010039 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro
Ron-Angevin, Ricardo
Sanz-Arigita, Ernesto J.
Parize, Antoine
Esquirol, Juliette
Perrier, Alban
Laur, Simon
André, Jean-Marc
Lespinet-Najib, Véronique
Garcia, Liliana
Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title_full Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title_fullStr Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title_short Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface
title_sort effect of distracting background speech in an auditory brain–computer interface
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010039
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezrodriguezalvaro effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT ronangevinricardo effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT sanzarigitaernestoj effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT parizeantoine effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT esquiroljuliette effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT perrieralban effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT laursimon effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT andrejeanmarc effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT lespinetnajibveronique effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface
AT garcialiliana effectofdistractingbackgroundspeechinanauditorybraincomputerinterface