Cargando…

Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review

While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Cheryl, Tu, Pikuei, Beitsch, Leslie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33396832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010016
_version_ 1783639936743768064
author Lin, Cheryl
Tu, Pikuei
Beitsch, Leslie M.
author_facet Lin, Cheryl
Tu, Pikuei
Beitsch, Leslie M.
author_sort Lin, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7823859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78238592021-01-24 Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review Lin, Cheryl Tu, Pikuei Beitsch, Leslie M. Vaccines (Basel) Review While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities. MDPI 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7823859/ /pubmed/33396832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010016 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lin, Cheryl
Tu, Pikuei
Beitsch, Leslie M.
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_fullStr Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_short Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_sort confidence and receptivity for covid-19 vaccines: a rapid systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7823859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33396832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010016
work_keys_str_mv AT lincheryl confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview
AT tupikuei confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview
AT beitschlesliem confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview