Cargando…
Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023 |
_version_ | 1783640141400637440 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yen-Ju Yu, Wen-Hao Chen, Li-Wen Huang, Chao-Ching Kang, Lin Lin, Hui-Shan Iwata, Osuke Kato, Shin Hussein, Mohamed Hamed Lin, Yung-Chieh |
author_facet | Chen, Yen-Ju Yu, Wen-Hao Chen, Li-Wen Huang, Chao-Ching Kang, Lin Lin, Hui-Shan Iwata, Osuke Kato, Shin Hussein, Mohamed Hamed Lin, Yung-Chieh |
author_sort | Chen, Yen-Ju |
collection | PubMed |
description | Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010–2015; Epoch-II, 2016–2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170–5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7824697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78246972021-01-24 Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 Chen, Yen-Ju Yu, Wen-Hao Chen, Li-Wen Huang, Chao-Ching Kang, Lin Lin, Hui-Shan Iwata, Osuke Kato, Shin Hussein, Mohamed Hamed Lin, Yung-Chieh Children (Basel) Article Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010–2015; Epoch-II, 2016–2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170–5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7824697/ /pubmed/33406755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Yen-Ju Yu, Wen-Hao Chen, Li-Wen Huang, Chao-Ching Kang, Lin Lin, Hui-Shan Iwata, Osuke Kato, Shin Hussein, Mohamed Hamed Lin, Yung-Chieh Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title | Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title_full | Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title_fullStr | Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title_short | Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 |
title_sort | improved survival of periviable infants after alteration of the threshold of viability by the neonatal resuscitation program 2015 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyenju improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT yuwenhao improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT chenliwen improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT huangchaoching improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT kanglin improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT linhuishan improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT iwataosuke improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT katoshin improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT husseinmohamedhamed improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 AT linyungchieh improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015 |