Cargando…

Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015

Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yen-Ju, Yu, Wen-Hao, Chen, Li-Wen, Huang, Chao-Ching, Kang, Lin, Lin, Hui-Shan, Iwata, Osuke, Kato, Shin, Hussein, Mohamed Hamed, Lin, Yung-Chieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023
_version_ 1783640141400637440
author Chen, Yen-Ju
Yu, Wen-Hao
Chen, Li-Wen
Huang, Chao-Ching
Kang, Lin
Lin, Hui-Shan
Iwata, Osuke
Kato, Shin
Hussein, Mohamed Hamed
Lin, Yung-Chieh
author_facet Chen, Yen-Ju
Yu, Wen-Hao
Chen, Li-Wen
Huang, Chao-Ching
Kang, Lin
Lin, Hui-Shan
Iwata, Osuke
Kato, Shin
Hussein, Mohamed Hamed
Lin, Yung-Chieh
author_sort Chen, Yen-Ju
collection PubMed
description Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010–2015; Epoch-II, 2016–2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170–5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7824697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78246972021-01-24 Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 Chen, Yen-Ju Yu, Wen-Hao Chen, Li-Wen Huang, Chao-Ching Kang, Lin Lin, Hui-Shan Iwata, Osuke Kato, Shin Hussein, Mohamed Hamed Lin, Yung-Chieh Children (Basel) Article Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010–2015; Epoch-II, 2016–2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170–5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future. MDPI 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7824697/ /pubmed/33406755 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Yen-Ju
Yu, Wen-Hao
Chen, Li-Wen
Huang, Chao-Ching
Kang, Lin
Lin, Hui-Shan
Iwata, Osuke
Kato, Shin
Hussein, Mohamed Hamed
Lin, Yung-Chieh
Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title_full Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title_fullStr Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title_full_unstemmed Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title_short Improved Survival of Periviable Infants after Alteration of the Threshold of Viability by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015
title_sort improved survival of periviable infants after alteration of the threshold of viability by the neonatal resuscitation program 2015
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33406755
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010023
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyenju improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT yuwenhao improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT chenliwen improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT huangchaoching improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT kanglin improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT linhuishan improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT iwataosuke improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT katoshin improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT husseinmohamedhamed improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015
AT linyungchieh improvedsurvivalofperiviableinfantsafteralterationofthethresholdofviabilitybytheneonatalresuscitationprogram2015