Cargando…

The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation for neonates with severe cardiorespiratory life-threatening conditions is highly effective. However, since ECMO is a high-risk and complex therapy, this treatment is usually performed in centers with proven expertise. Methods: A ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padalino, Massimo A., Doglioni, Nicoletta, Nardo, Daniel, Baraldi, Eugenio, Vida, Vladimiro L., Trevisanuto, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33466419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010024
_version_ 1783640179402080256
author Padalino, Massimo A.
Doglioni, Nicoletta
Nardo, Daniel
Baraldi, Eugenio
Vida, Vladimiro L.
Trevisanuto, Daniele
author_facet Padalino, Massimo A.
Doglioni, Nicoletta
Nardo, Daniel
Baraldi, Eugenio
Vida, Vladimiro L.
Trevisanuto, Daniele
author_sort Padalino, Massimo A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation for neonates with severe cardiorespiratory life-threatening conditions is highly effective. However, since ECMO is a high-risk and complex therapy, this treatment is usually performed in centers with proven expertise. Methods: A retrospective review of neonates, from January 2014 to January 2020, presenting with life-threatening conditions and treated by means of Hub and Spoke (HandS) ECMO in peripheral (spoke) hospitals. Data were retrieved from our internal ECMO registry. Protocols and checklists were revised and shared with all spoke hospitals located in North-Eastern Italy. Results: Eleven neonates receiving maximal respiratory and cardiovascular support at a spoke hospital underwent HandS ECMO management. All but three patients were affected by life-threatening meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). The median ECMO support duration and hospitalization were four (range 2–32) and 30 days (range 8–50), respectively. All but two patients (with congenital diaphragmatic hernia), were weaned off ECMO and discharged home. At a mean follow up of 33.7 ± 29.2 months, all survivors were alive and well, without medications, and normal somatic growth. All but one had normal neuropsychological development. Conclusion: HandS ECMO model for neonates with life-threatening conditions is effective and successful. A specialized multidisciplinary team and close cooperation between Hub and Spoke centers are essential for success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7824856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78248562021-01-24 The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions Padalino, Massimo A. Doglioni, Nicoletta Nardo, Daniel Baraldi, Eugenio Vida, Vladimiro L. Trevisanuto, Daniele Children (Basel) Article Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation for neonates with severe cardiorespiratory life-threatening conditions is highly effective. However, since ECMO is a high-risk and complex therapy, this treatment is usually performed in centers with proven expertise. Methods: A retrospective review of neonates, from January 2014 to January 2020, presenting with life-threatening conditions and treated by means of Hub and Spoke (HandS) ECMO in peripheral (spoke) hospitals. Data were retrieved from our internal ECMO registry. Protocols and checklists were revised and shared with all spoke hospitals located in North-Eastern Italy. Results: Eleven neonates receiving maximal respiratory and cardiovascular support at a spoke hospital underwent HandS ECMO management. All but three patients were affected by life-threatening meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). The median ECMO support duration and hospitalization were four (range 2–32) and 30 days (range 8–50), respectively. All but two patients (with congenital diaphragmatic hernia), were weaned off ECMO and discharged home. At a mean follow up of 33.7 ± 29.2 months, all survivors were alive and well, without medications, and normal somatic growth. All but one had normal neuropsychological development. Conclusion: HandS ECMO model for neonates with life-threatening conditions is effective and successful. A specialized multidisciplinary team and close cooperation between Hub and Spoke centers are essential for success. MDPI 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7824856/ /pubmed/33466419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010024 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Padalino, Massimo A.
Doglioni, Nicoletta
Nardo, Daniel
Baraldi, Eugenio
Vida, Vladimiro L.
Trevisanuto, Daniele
The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title_full The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title_fullStr The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title_full_unstemmed The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title_short The “Hub and Spoke” (HandS) ECMO for “Resuscitating” Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions
title_sort “hub and spoke” (hands) ecmo for “resuscitating” neonates with respiratory life-threatening conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33466419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8010024
work_keys_str_mv AT padalinomassimoa thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT doglioninicoletta thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT nardodaniel thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT baraldieugenio thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT vidavladimirol thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT trevisanutodaniele thehubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT padalinomassimoa hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT doglioninicoletta hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT nardodaniel hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT baraldieugenio hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT vidavladimirol hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions
AT trevisanutodaniele hubandspokehandsecmoforresuscitatingneonateswithrespiratorylifethreateningconditions