Cargando…
What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment
BACKGROUND: The free list, also written “freelist”, or “free recall”, is an ethnographic method that characterizes the local knowledge of a population about a given cultural domain. However, there is still much to elucidate about the variables that can influence the number of items that participants...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33485375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-021-00432-5 |
_version_ | 1783640193001062400 |
---|---|
author | Meireles, Melise Pessôa Araujo de Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino de Medeiros, Patrícia Muniz |
author_facet | Meireles, Melise Pessôa Araujo de Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino de Medeiros, Patrícia Muniz |
author_sort | Meireles, Melise Pessôa Araujo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The free list, also written “freelist”, or “free recall”, is an ethnographic method that characterizes the local knowledge of a population about a given cultural domain. However, there is still much to elucidate about the variables that can influence the number of items that participants cite using this technique. This study applied a casual-comparative experimental design to analyze whether 3 months’ time, age, and external stimuli influence the similarity of plant free lists applied at different times. METHODS: Data was collected from 103 farmers from the rural community Alto dos Canutos, in the municipality of Picos, Piauí state, Brazil. Two free lists were conducted at two different times, with an interval of three months between them. Subsequently, the similarity between the first and second free lists of each participant was calculated using the Jaccard Similarity Index. The generalized linear model (GLM) with binomial errors and stepwise approach was used to analyze the effects of age and external stimuli on information collection when comparing free lists applied at different times. RESULTS: Participants’ age influenced the information that the free lists collected, demonstrating that the older the participants, the lower the similarity among the free lists. Among the external stimuli analyzed, only the presence of third parties influenced the content of the free lists at the time of the interview. However, contrary to expectations, third-party presence positively influenced the similarity of the lists. CONCLUSION: The results show that the studied variables age and third-party presence can influence the capture of knowledge. These findings warrant future research into the influences’ causes and their potential mitigation, e.g., by isolation or by breaking the medicinal plant domain into focused sub-domains and conducting simpler, successive free-lists, which can mitigate memory issues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-021-00432-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7824914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78249142021-01-25 What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment Meireles, Melise Pessôa Araujo de Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino de Medeiros, Patrícia Muniz J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: The free list, also written “freelist”, or “free recall”, is an ethnographic method that characterizes the local knowledge of a population about a given cultural domain. However, there is still much to elucidate about the variables that can influence the number of items that participants cite using this technique. This study applied a casual-comparative experimental design to analyze whether 3 months’ time, age, and external stimuli influence the similarity of plant free lists applied at different times. METHODS: Data was collected from 103 farmers from the rural community Alto dos Canutos, in the municipality of Picos, Piauí state, Brazil. Two free lists were conducted at two different times, with an interval of three months between them. Subsequently, the similarity between the first and second free lists of each participant was calculated using the Jaccard Similarity Index. The generalized linear model (GLM) with binomial errors and stepwise approach was used to analyze the effects of age and external stimuli on information collection when comparing free lists applied at different times. RESULTS: Participants’ age influenced the information that the free lists collected, demonstrating that the older the participants, the lower the similarity among the free lists. Among the external stimuli analyzed, only the presence of third parties influenced the content of the free lists at the time of the interview. However, contrary to expectations, third-party presence positively influenced the similarity of the lists. CONCLUSION: The results show that the studied variables age and third-party presence can influence the capture of knowledge. These findings warrant future research into the influences’ causes and their potential mitigation, e.g., by isolation or by breaking the medicinal plant domain into focused sub-domains and conducting simpler, successive free-lists, which can mitigate memory issues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-021-00432-5. BioMed Central 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7824914/ /pubmed/33485375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-021-00432-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Meireles, Melise Pessôa Araujo de Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino de Medeiros, Patrícia Muniz What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title | What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title_full | What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title_fullStr | What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title_short | What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
title_sort | what interferes with conducting free lists? a comparative ethnobotanical experiment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7824914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33485375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-021-00432-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meirelesmelisepessoaaraujo whatinterfereswithconductingfreelistsacomparativeethnobotanicalexperiment AT dealbuquerqueulyssespaulino whatinterfereswithconductingfreelistsacomparativeethnobotanicalexperiment AT demedeirospatriciamuniz whatinterfereswithconductingfreelistsacomparativeethnobotanicalexperiment |