Cargando…

Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review

Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatanaka, Takeshi, Naganuma, Atsushi, Kakizaki, Satoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036
_version_ 1783640213115895808
author Hatanaka, Takeshi
Naganuma, Atsushi
Kakizaki, Satoru
author_facet Hatanaka, Takeshi
Naganuma, Atsushi
Kakizaki, Satoru
author_sort Hatanaka, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage were the key factors in achieving therapeutic efficacy. The management of adverse events plays an important role in continuing lenvatinib treatment. While sequential therapies contributed to prolonging overall survival, effective molecular targeted agents for the administration after lenvatinib have not been established. Repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was associated with a decline in the liver function and poor therapeutic response in BCLC intermediate patients. Recently, the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE) Consensus Statement proposed the criteria for TACE unsuitability. Upfront systemic therapy may be better for the BCLC intermediate stage HCC patients with a high tumor burden, while selective TACE will be recommended for obtaining a curative response in patients with a low tumor burden. This article reviews the therapeutic response, management of adverse events, post-progression treatment after Lenvatinib, and treatment strategy for BCLC intermediate stage HCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78250212021-01-24 Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review Hatanaka, Takeshi Naganuma, Atsushi Kakizaki, Satoru Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Review Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage were the key factors in achieving therapeutic efficacy. The management of adverse events plays an important role in continuing lenvatinib treatment. While sequential therapies contributed to prolonging overall survival, effective molecular targeted agents for the administration after lenvatinib have not been established. Repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was associated with a decline in the liver function and poor therapeutic response in BCLC intermediate patients. Recently, the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE) Consensus Statement proposed the criteria for TACE unsuitability. Upfront systemic therapy may be better for the BCLC intermediate stage HCC patients with a high tumor burden, while selective TACE will be recommended for obtaining a curative response in patients with a low tumor burden. This article reviews the therapeutic response, management of adverse events, post-progression treatment after Lenvatinib, and treatment strategy for BCLC intermediate stage HCC. MDPI 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7825021/ /pubmed/33418941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hatanaka, Takeshi
Naganuma, Atsushi
Kakizaki, Satoru
Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title_full Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title_short Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
title_sort lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036
work_keys_str_mv AT hatanakatakeshi lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT naganumaatsushi lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview
AT kakizakisatoru lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview