Cargando…
Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review
Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Cli...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036 |
_version_ | 1783640213115895808 |
---|---|
author | Hatanaka, Takeshi Naganuma, Atsushi Kakizaki, Satoru |
author_facet | Hatanaka, Takeshi Naganuma, Atsushi Kakizaki, Satoru |
author_sort | Hatanaka, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage were the key factors in achieving therapeutic efficacy. The management of adverse events plays an important role in continuing lenvatinib treatment. While sequential therapies contributed to prolonging overall survival, effective molecular targeted agents for the administration after lenvatinib have not been established. Repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was associated with a decline in the liver function and poor therapeutic response in BCLC intermediate patients. Recently, the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE) Consensus Statement proposed the criteria for TACE unsuitability. Upfront systemic therapy may be better for the BCLC intermediate stage HCC patients with a high tumor burden, while selective TACE will be recommended for obtaining a curative response in patients with a low tumor burden. This article reviews the therapeutic response, management of adverse events, post-progression treatment after Lenvatinib, and treatment strategy for BCLC intermediate stage HCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7825021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78250212021-01-24 Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review Hatanaka, Takeshi Naganuma, Atsushi Kakizaki, Satoru Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Review Lenvatinib, which is an oral multikinase inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to the sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) and better progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A good liver function and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage were the key factors in achieving therapeutic efficacy. The management of adverse events plays an important role in continuing lenvatinib treatment. While sequential therapies contributed to prolonging overall survival, effective molecular targeted agents for the administration after lenvatinib have not been established. Repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was associated with a decline in the liver function and poor therapeutic response in BCLC intermediate patients. Recently, the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert (APPLE) Consensus Statement proposed the criteria for TACE unsuitability. Upfront systemic therapy may be better for the BCLC intermediate stage HCC patients with a high tumor burden, while selective TACE will be recommended for obtaining a curative response in patients with a low tumor burden. This article reviews the therapeutic response, management of adverse events, post-progression treatment after Lenvatinib, and treatment strategy for BCLC intermediate stage HCC. MDPI 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7825021/ /pubmed/33418941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Hatanaka, Takeshi Naganuma, Atsushi Kakizaki, Satoru Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title | Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title_full | Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title_short | Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Literature Review |
title_sort | lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14010036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatanakatakeshi lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview AT naganumaatsushi lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview AT kakizakisatoru lenvatinibforhepatocellularcarcinomaaliteraturereview |