Cargando…
Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic ident...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078 |
_version_ | 1783640219933736960 |
---|---|
author | Dörschug, Anja Schwanbeck, Julian Hahn, Andreas Hillebrecht, Anke Blaschke, Sabine Mese, Kemal Groß, Uwe Dierks, Sascha Frickmann, Hagen Zautner, Andreas E. |
author_facet | Dörschug, Anja Schwanbeck, Julian Hahn, Andreas Hillebrecht, Anke Blaschke, Sabine Mese, Kemal Groß, Uwe Dierks, Sascha Frickmann, Hagen Zautner, Andreas E. |
author_sort | Dörschug, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7825051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78250512021-01-24 Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Dörschug, Anja Schwanbeck, Julian Hahn, Andreas Hillebrecht, Anke Blaschke, Sabine Mese, Kemal Groß, Uwe Dierks, Sascha Frickmann, Hagen Zautner, Andreas E. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes. MDPI 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7825051/ /pubmed/33418886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dörschug, Anja Schwanbeck, Julian Hahn, Andreas Hillebrecht, Anke Blaschke, Sabine Mese, Kemal Groß, Uwe Dierks, Sascha Frickmann, Hagen Zautner, Andreas E. Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title | Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title_full | Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title_short | Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |
title_sort | comparison of five serological assays for the detection of sars-cov-2 antibodies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dorschuganja comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT schwanbeckjulian comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT hahnandreas comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT hillebrechtanke comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT blaschkesabine comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT mesekemal comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT großuwe comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT dierkssascha comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT frickmannhagen comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies AT zautnerandrease comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies |