Cargando…

Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dörschug, Anja, Schwanbeck, Julian, Hahn, Andreas, Hillebrecht, Anke, Blaschke, Sabine, Mese, Kemal, Groß, Uwe, Dierks, Sascha, Frickmann, Hagen, Zautner, Andreas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078
_version_ 1783640219933736960
author Dörschug, Anja
Schwanbeck, Julian
Hahn, Andreas
Hillebrecht, Anke
Blaschke, Sabine
Mese, Kemal
Groß, Uwe
Dierks, Sascha
Frickmann, Hagen
Zautner, Andreas E.
author_facet Dörschug, Anja
Schwanbeck, Julian
Hahn, Andreas
Hillebrecht, Anke
Blaschke, Sabine
Mese, Kemal
Groß, Uwe
Dierks, Sascha
Frickmann, Hagen
Zautner, Andreas E.
author_sort Dörschug, Anja
collection PubMed
description Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78250512021-01-24 Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Dörschug, Anja Schwanbeck, Julian Hahn, Andreas Hillebrecht, Anke Blaschke, Sabine Mese, Kemal Groß, Uwe Dierks, Sascha Frickmann, Hagen Zautner, Andreas E. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes. MDPI 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7825051/ /pubmed/33418886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dörschug, Anja
Schwanbeck, Julian
Hahn, Andreas
Hillebrecht, Anke
Blaschke, Sabine
Mese, Kemal
Groß, Uwe
Dierks, Sascha
Frickmann, Hagen
Zautner, Andreas E.
Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title_full Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title_fullStr Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title_short Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies
title_sort comparison of five serological assays for the detection of sars-cov-2 antibodies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33418886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010078
work_keys_str_mv AT dorschuganja comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT schwanbeckjulian comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT hahnandreas comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT hillebrechtanke comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT blaschkesabine comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT mesekemal comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT großuwe comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT dierkssascha comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT frickmannhagen comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies
AT zautnerandrease comparisonoffiveserologicalassaysforthedetectionofsarscov2antibodies