Cargando…

Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: No-reflow is a major challenging issue in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aimed to investigate the clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow. Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shakiba, Maryam, Salari, Arsalan, Mirbolouk, Fardin, Sotudeh, Nozar, Nikfarjam, Salman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552194
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v15i2.4183
_version_ 1783640316278996992
author Shakiba, Maryam
Salari, Arsalan
Mirbolouk, Fardin
Sotudeh, Nozar
Nikfarjam, Salman
author_facet Shakiba, Maryam
Salari, Arsalan
Mirbolouk, Fardin
Sotudeh, Nozar
Nikfarjam, Salman
author_sort Shakiba, Maryam
collection PubMed
description Background: No-reflow is a major challenging issue in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aimed to investigate the clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow. Methods: This study was conducted on 378 patients with STEMI admitted to Dr. Heshmat Educational and Remedial Center (a referral heart hospital in Rasht, Iran) between 2015 and 2017. The study population was divided based on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and the myocardial blush grade into no-reflow and reflow groups. The clinical, laboratory, and procedural characteristics at admission were compared between the 2 groups using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 58.57±11.49 years, and men comprised 74.1% of the study population. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 77 patients. The no-reflow group was significantly older and more likely to be female; additionally, it had higher frequencies of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cardiovascular diseases. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age >60 years (OR=1.05, 95% CI:1.00–1.09), hypertension (OR=2.91, 95% CI:1.35–6.27), diabetes (OR=4.18, 95% CI:1.89–9.22), a low systolic blood pressure (OR=3.53, 95% CI:1.02–12.2), a history of cardiovascular diseases (OR=4.29, 95% CI:1.88–9.77), chronic heart failure (OR=4.96, 95% CI:1.23–20), a low initial TIMI flow grade (OR=7.58, 95% CI:1.46–39.2 ), anemia (OR=3.42, 95% CI:1.33–8.77), and stenting vs. balloon angioplasty (OR=0.42, 95% CI:0.19–0.91) were the significant independent predictors of no-reflow. Conclusion: This study revealed some clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow for the prediction of high-risk patients and their appropriate management to reduce the risk of no-reflow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78254672021-02-04 Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Shakiba, Maryam Salari, Arsalan Mirbolouk, Fardin Sotudeh, Nozar Nikfarjam, Salman J Tehran Heart Cent Original Article Background: No-reflow is a major challenging issue in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This study aimed to investigate the clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow. Methods: This study was conducted on 378 patients with STEMI admitted to Dr. Heshmat Educational and Remedial Center (a referral heart hospital in Rasht, Iran) between 2015 and 2017. The study population was divided based on the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and the myocardial blush grade into no-reflow and reflow groups. The clinical, laboratory, and procedural characteristics at admission were compared between the 2 groups using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 58.57±11.49 years, and men comprised 74.1% of the study population. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 77 patients. The no-reflow group was significantly older and more likely to be female; additionally, it had higher frequencies of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cardiovascular diseases. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age >60 years (OR=1.05, 95% CI:1.00–1.09), hypertension (OR=2.91, 95% CI:1.35–6.27), diabetes (OR=4.18, 95% CI:1.89–9.22), a low systolic blood pressure (OR=3.53, 95% CI:1.02–12.2), a history of cardiovascular diseases (OR=4.29, 95% CI:1.88–9.77), chronic heart failure (OR=4.96, 95% CI:1.23–20), a low initial TIMI flow grade (OR=7.58, 95% CI:1.46–39.2 ), anemia (OR=3.42, 95% CI:1.33–8.77), and stenting vs. balloon angioplasty (OR=0.42, 95% CI:0.19–0.91) were the significant independent predictors of no-reflow. Conclusion: This study revealed some clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow for the prediction of high-risk patients and their appropriate management to reduce the risk of no-reflow. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7825467/ /pubmed/33552194 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v15i2.4183 Text en Copyright © 2020 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shakiba, Maryam
Salari, Arsalan
Mirbolouk, Fardin
Sotudeh, Nozar
Nikfarjam, Salman
Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Predictors of No-Reflow in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort clinical, laboratory, and procedural predictors of no-reflow in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552194
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v15i2.4183
work_keys_str_mv AT shakibamaryam clinicallaboratoryandproceduralpredictorsofnoreflowinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT salariarsalan clinicallaboratoryandproceduralpredictorsofnoreflowinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT mirboloukfardin clinicallaboratoryandproceduralpredictorsofnoreflowinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT sotudehnozar clinicallaboratoryandproceduralpredictorsofnoreflowinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT nikfarjamsalman clinicallaboratoryandproceduralpredictorsofnoreflowinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention