Cargando…

An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes

Up to 95% of the liquid volume in an e-cigarette consists of propylene glycol. Previous research has shown that propylene glycol can generate diacetyl and formaldehyde when heated. New research shows that propylene glycol can also generate methylglyoxal, an alpha di-carbonyl compound recently shown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azimi, Parham, Keshavarz, Zahra, Lahaie Luna, Marianne, Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo, Vallarino, Jose, Christiani, David C., Allen, Joseph G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020385
_version_ 1783640318355177472
author Azimi, Parham
Keshavarz, Zahra
Lahaie Luna, Marianne
Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo
Vallarino, Jose
Christiani, David C.
Allen, Joseph G.
author_facet Azimi, Parham
Keshavarz, Zahra
Lahaie Luna, Marianne
Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo
Vallarino, Jose
Christiani, David C.
Allen, Joseph G.
author_sort Azimi, Parham
collection PubMed
description Up to 95% of the liquid volume in an e-cigarette consists of propylene glycol. Previous research has shown that propylene glycol can generate diacetyl and formaldehyde when heated. New research shows that propylene glycol can also generate methylglyoxal, an alpha di-carbonyl compound recently shown to cause epithelial necrosis at even lower concentrations than diacetyl, the flavoring chemical associated with bronchiolitis obliterans (“Popcorn Lung”). We analyzed chemical emissions from 13 JUUL pod flavors. Diacetyl and methylglyoxal was detected in 100% of samples with median concentration (range) of 20 µg/m(3) (less than limit of quantification: 54 µg/m(3)) and 4219 µg/m(3) (677–15,342 µg/m(3)), respectively. We also detected acetaldehyde (median concentration: 341 µg/m(3)) and propionaldehyde (median concentration: 87 µg/m(3)) in all samples. The recent evidence that methylglyoxal is more cytotoxic to airway epithelial cells than diacetyl makes this an urgent public health concern. Current smokers considering e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, and never users, who may be under the impression that e-cigarettes are harmless, need information on emissions and potential risks to make informed decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78254902021-01-24 An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes Azimi, Parham Keshavarz, Zahra Lahaie Luna, Marianne Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo Vallarino, Jose Christiani, David C. Allen, Joseph G. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Up to 95% of the liquid volume in an e-cigarette consists of propylene glycol. Previous research has shown that propylene glycol can generate diacetyl and formaldehyde when heated. New research shows that propylene glycol can also generate methylglyoxal, an alpha di-carbonyl compound recently shown to cause epithelial necrosis at even lower concentrations than diacetyl, the flavoring chemical associated with bronchiolitis obliterans (“Popcorn Lung”). We analyzed chemical emissions from 13 JUUL pod flavors. Diacetyl and methylglyoxal was detected in 100% of samples with median concentration (range) of 20 µg/m(3) (less than limit of quantification: 54 µg/m(3)) and 4219 µg/m(3) (677–15,342 µg/m(3)), respectively. We also detected acetaldehyde (median concentration: 341 µg/m(3)) and propionaldehyde (median concentration: 87 µg/m(3)) in all samples. The recent evidence that methylglyoxal is more cytotoxic to airway epithelial cells than diacetyl makes this an urgent public health concern. Current smokers considering e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, and never users, who may be under the impression that e-cigarettes are harmless, need information on emissions and potential risks to make informed decisions. MDPI 2021-01-06 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7825490/ /pubmed/33419122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020385 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Azimi, Parham
Keshavarz, Zahra
Lahaie Luna, Marianne
Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo
Vallarino, Jose
Christiani, David C.
Allen, Joseph G.
An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title_full An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title_fullStr An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title_full_unstemmed An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title_short An Unrecognized Hazard in E-Cigarette Vapor: Preliminary Quantification of Methylglyoxal Formation from Propylene Glycol in E-Cigarettes
title_sort unrecognized hazard in e-cigarette vapor: preliminary quantification of methylglyoxal formation from propylene glycol in e-cigarettes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33419122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020385
work_keys_str_mv AT azimiparham anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT keshavarzzahra anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT lahaielunamarianne anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT cedenolaurentjoseguillermo anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT vallarinojose anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT christianidavidc anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT allenjosephg anunrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT azimiparham unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT keshavarzzahra unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT lahaielunamarianne unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT cedenolaurentjoseguillermo unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT vallarinojose unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT christianidavidc unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes
AT allenjosephg unrecognizedhazardinecigarettevaporpreliminaryquantificationofmethylglyoxalformationfrompropyleneglycolinecigarettes