Cargando…

Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion

The optimization of multisystem neurorehabilitation protocols including electrical spinal cord stimulation and multi-directional tasks training require understanding of underlying circuits mechanisms and distribution of the neuronal network over the spinal cord. In this study we compared the locomot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merkulyeva, Natalia, Lyakhovetskii, Vsevolod, Veshchitskii, Aleksandr, Gorskii, Oleg, Musienko, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010069
_version_ 1783640357872861184
author Merkulyeva, Natalia
Lyakhovetskii, Vsevolod
Veshchitskii, Aleksandr
Gorskii, Oleg
Musienko, Pavel
author_facet Merkulyeva, Natalia
Lyakhovetskii, Vsevolod
Veshchitskii, Aleksandr
Gorskii, Oleg
Musienko, Pavel
author_sort Merkulyeva, Natalia
collection PubMed
description The optimization of multisystem neurorehabilitation protocols including electrical spinal cord stimulation and multi-directional tasks training require understanding of underlying circuits mechanisms and distribution of the neuronal network over the spinal cord. In this study we compared the locomotor activity during forward and backward stepping in eighteen adult decerebrated cats. Interneuronal spinal networks responsible for forward and backward stepping were visualized using the C-Fos technique. A bi-modal rostrocaudal distribution of C-Fos-immunopositive neurons over the lumbosacral spinal cord (peaks in the L4/L5 and L6/S1 segments) was revealed. These patterns were compared with motoneuronal pools using Vanderhorst and Holstege scheme; the location of the first peak was correspondent to the motoneurons of the hip flexors and knee extensors, an inter-peak drop was presumably attributed to the motoneurons controlling the adductor muscles. Both were better expressed in cats stepping forward and in parallel, electromyographic (EMG) activity of the hip flexor and knee extensors was higher, while EMG activity of the adductor was lower, during this locomotor mode. On the basis of the present data, which showed greater activity of the adductor muscles and the attributed interneuronal spinal network during backward stepping and according with data about greater demands on postural control systems during backward locomotion, we suppose that the locomotor networks for movements in opposite directions are at least partially different.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78256572021-01-24 Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion Merkulyeva, Natalia Lyakhovetskii, Vsevolod Veshchitskii, Aleksandr Gorskii, Oleg Musienko, Pavel Brain Sci Article The optimization of multisystem neurorehabilitation protocols including electrical spinal cord stimulation and multi-directional tasks training require understanding of underlying circuits mechanisms and distribution of the neuronal network over the spinal cord. In this study we compared the locomotor activity during forward and backward stepping in eighteen adult decerebrated cats. Interneuronal spinal networks responsible for forward and backward stepping were visualized using the C-Fos technique. A bi-modal rostrocaudal distribution of C-Fos-immunopositive neurons over the lumbosacral spinal cord (peaks in the L4/L5 and L6/S1 segments) was revealed. These patterns were compared with motoneuronal pools using Vanderhorst and Holstege scheme; the location of the first peak was correspondent to the motoneurons of the hip flexors and knee extensors, an inter-peak drop was presumably attributed to the motoneurons controlling the adductor muscles. Both were better expressed in cats stepping forward and in parallel, electromyographic (EMG) activity of the hip flexor and knee extensors was higher, while EMG activity of the adductor was lower, during this locomotor mode. On the basis of the present data, which showed greater activity of the adductor muscles and the attributed interneuronal spinal network during backward stepping and according with data about greater demands on postural control systems during backward locomotion, we suppose that the locomotor networks for movements in opposite directions are at least partially different. MDPI 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7825657/ /pubmed/33430215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010069 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Merkulyeva, Natalia
Lyakhovetskii, Vsevolod
Veshchitskii, Aleksandr
Gorskii, Oleg
Musienko, Pavel
Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title_full Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title_fullStr Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title_full_unstemmed Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title_short Rostrocaudal Distribution of the C-Fos-Immunopositive Spinal Network Defined by Muscle Activity during Locomotion
title_sort rostrocaudal distribution of the c-fos-immunopositive spinal network defined by muscle activity during locomotion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010069
work_keys_str_mv AT merkulyevanatalia rostrocaudaldistributionofthecfosimmunopositivespinalnetworkdefinedbymuscleactivityduringlocomotion
AT lyakhovetskiivsevolod rostrocaudaldistributionofthecfosimmunopositivespinalnetworkdefinedbymuscleactivityduringlocomotion
AT veshchitskiialeksandr rostrocaudaldistributionofthecfosimmunopositivespinalnetworkdefinedbymuscleactivityduringlocomotion
AT gorskiioleg rostrocaudaldistributionofthecfosimmunopositivespinalnetworkdefinedbymuscleactivityduringlocomotion
AT musienkopavel rostrocaudaldistributionofthecfosimmunopositivespinalnetworkdefinedbymuscleactivityduringlocomotion