Cargando…

Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand

Microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has been a promising method to improve geotechnical engineering properties through the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) on the contact and surface of soil particles in recent years. In the present experiment, water absorption and unconfined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jitong, Tong, Huawei, Shan, Yi, Yuan, Jie, Peng, Qiuwang, Liang, Junling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020268
_version_ 1783640389640519680
author Zhao, Jitong
Tong, Huawei
Shan, Yi
Yuan, Jie
Peng, Qiuwang
Liang, Junling
author_facet Zhao, Jitong
Tong, Huawei
Shan, Yi
Yuan, Jie
Peng, Qiuwang
Liang, Junling
author_sort Zhao, Jitong
collection PubMed
description Microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has been a promising method to improve geotechnical engineering properties through the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) on the contact and surface of soil particles in recent years. In the present experiment, water absorption and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests were carried out to investigate the effects of three different fiber types (glass fiber, polyester fiber, and hemp fiber) on the physical and mechanical properties of MICP-treated calcareous sand. The fibers used were at 0%, 0.10%, 0.15%, 0.20%, 0.25%, 0.30%, 0.35%, and 0.40% relative to the weight of the sand. The results showed that the failure strain and ductility of the samples could be improved by adding fibers. Compared to biocemented sand (BS), the water absorption of these three fiber-reinforced biocemented sands were, respectively, decreased by 11.60%, 21.18%, and 7.29%. UCS was, respectively, increased by 24.20%, 60.76%, and 6.40%. Polyester fiber produced the best effect, followed by glass fiber and hemp fiber. The optimum contents of glass fiber and polyester fiber were 0.20% and 0.25%, respectively. The optimum content of hemp fiber was within the range of 0.20–0.25%. Light-emitting diode (LED) microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images lead to the conclusion that only a little calcite precipitation had occurred around the hemp fiber, leading to a poor bonding effect compared to the glass and polyester fibers. It was therefore suggested that polyester fiber should be used to improve the properties of biocemented sand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78257892021-01-24 Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand Zhao, Jitong Tong, Huawei Shan, Yi Yuan, Jie Peng, Qiuwang Liang, Junling Materials (Basel) Article Microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has been a promising method to improve geotechnical engineering properties through the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO(3)) on the contact and surface of soil particles in recent years. In the present experiment, water absorption and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests were carried out to investigate the effects of three different fiber types (glass fiber, polyester fiber, and hemp fiber) on the physical and mechanical properties of MICP-treated calcareous sand. The fibers used were at 0%, 0.10%, 0.15%, 0.20%, 0.25%, 0.30%, 0.35%, and 0.40% relative to the weight of the sand. The results showed that the failure strain and ductility of the samples could be improved by adding fibers. Compared to biocemented sand (BS), the water absorption of these three fiber-reinforced biocemented sands were, respectively, decreased by 11.60%, 21.18%, and 7.29%. UCS was, respectively, increased by 24.20%, 60.76%, and 6.40%. Polyester fiber produced the best effect, followed by glass fiber and hemp fiber. The optimum contents of glass fiber and polyester fiber were 0.20% and 0.25%, respectively. The optimum content of hemp fiber was within the range of 0.20–0.25%. Light-emitting diode (LED) microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images lead to the conclusion that only a little calcite precipitation had occurred around the hemp fiber, leading to a poor bonding effect compared to the glass and polyester fibers. It was therefore suggested that polyester fiber should be used to improve the properties of biocemented sand. MDPI 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7825789/ /pubmed/33430360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020268 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Jitong
Tong, Huawei
Shan, Yi
Yuan, Jie
Peng, Qiuwang
Liang, Junling
Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title_full Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title_fullStr Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title_short Effects of Different Types of Fibers on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand
title_sort effects of different types of fibers on the physical and mechanical properties of micp-treated calcareous sand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020268
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojitong effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand
AT tonghuawei effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand
AT shanyi effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand
AT yuanjie effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand
AT pengqiuwang effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand
AT liangjunling effectsofdifferenttypesoffibersonthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofmicptreatedcalcareoussand