Cargando…
Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002 |
_version_ | 1783640403195461632 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Panpan Tian, Deqiao |
author_facet | Wang, Panpan Tian, Deqiao |
author_sort | Wang, Panpan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or submitted to four preprint platforms: bioRxiv, medRxiv, Preprints, and SSRN. Using data on the number of reports, author institution, country, and research category, we analyze global trends in COVID-19 research, including institution distribution and research hotspots. The results show that a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been produced; the United States has contributed the most published literature, followed by China. The United States has published the most reports included in the WOS in the categories of non-pharmaceutical interventions, treatment, and vaccine-related reports, while China has published the most literature in the categories of clinical features and complications, virology and immunology, epidemiology, and detection and diagnosis. Publication countries are concentrated in Asia, North America, and Europe, while South America and Africa have less literature. In conclusion, many scientific research issues related to COVID-19 need to be further clarified and COVID-19 research urgently needs global cooperation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7825845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78258452021-01-25 Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 Wang, Panpan Tian, Deqiao J Biosaf Biosecur Research Article Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or submitted to four preprint platforms: bioRxiv, medRxiv, Preprints, and SSRN. Using data on the number of reports, author institution, country, and research category, we analyze global trends in COVID-19 research, including institution distribution and research hotspots. The results show that a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been produced; the United States has contributed the most published literature, followed by China. The United States has published the most reports included in the WOS in the categories of non-pharmaceutical interventions, treatment, and vaccine-related reports, while China has published the most literature in the categories of clinical features and complications, virology and immunology, epidemiology, and detection and diagnosis. Publication countries are concentrated in Asia, North America, and Europe, while South America and Africa have less literature. In conclusion, many scientific research issues related to COVID-19 need to be further clarified and COVID-19 research urgently needs global cooperation. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021-06 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7825845/ /pubmed/33521590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Panpan Tian, Deqiao Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title | Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title_full | Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title_short | Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on covid-19 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangpanpan bibliometricanalysisofglobalscientificresearchoncovid19 AT tiandeqiao bibliometricanalysisofglobalscientificresearchoncovid19 |