Cargando…

Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Panpan, Tian, Deqiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002
_version_ 1783640403195461632
author Wang, Panpan
Tian, Deqiao
author_facet Wang, Panpan
Tian, Deqiao
author_sort Wang, Panpan
collection PubMed
description Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or submitted to four preprint platforms: bioRxiv, medRxiv, Preprints, and SSRN. Using data on the number of reports, author institution, country, and research category, we analyze global trends in COVID-19 research, including institution distribution and research hotspots. The results show that a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been produced; the United States has contributed the most published literature, followed by China. The United States has published the most reports included in the WOS in the categories of non-pharmaceutical interventions, treatment, and vaccine-related reports, while China has published the most literature in the categories of clinical features and complications, virology and immunology, epidemiology, and detection and diagnosis. Publication countries are concentrated in Asia, North America, and Europe, while South America and Africa have less literature. In conclusion, many scientific research issues related to COVID-19 need to be further clarified and COVID-19 research urgently needs global cooperation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7825845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78258452021-01-25 Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19 Wang, Panpan Tian, Deqiao J Biosaf Biosecur Research Article Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been published in journals or submitted to preprint platforms. In this study, we search the COVID-19-related literature officially published and included in the Web of Science (WOS) database or submitted to four preprint platforms: bioRxiv, medRxiv, Preprints, and SSRN. Using data on the number of reports, author institution, country, and research category, we analyze global trends in COVID-19 research, including institution distribution and research hotspots. The results show that a large number of COVID-19-related reports have been produced; the United States has contributed the most published literature, followed by China. The United States has published the most reports included in the WOS in the categories of non-pharmaceutical interventions, treatment, and vaccine-related reports, while China has published the most literature in the categories of clinical features and complications, virology and immunology, epidemiology, and detection and diagnosis. Publication countries are concentrated in Asia, North America, and Europe, while South America and Africa have less literature. In conclusion, many scientific research issues related to COVID-19 need to be further clarified and COVID-19 research urgently needs global cooperation. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2021-06 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7825845/ /pubmed/33521590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Panpan
Tian, Deqiao
Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title_full Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title_fullStr Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title_short Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19
title_sort bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on covid-19
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7825845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33521590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpanpan bibliometricanalysisofglobalscientificresearchoncovid19
AT tiandeqiao bibliometricanalysisofglobalscientificresearchoncovid19