Cargando…
Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the le...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269 |
_version_ | 1783640451852533760 |
---|---|
author | Le Guyader, Alexandre Pernot, Mathieu Delmas, Clément Roze, Stéphane Fau, Isabelle Flecher, Erwan Lebreton, Guillaume |
author_facet | Le Guyader, Alexandre Pernot, Mathieu Delmas, Clément Roze, Stéphane Fau, Isabelle Flecher, Erwan Lebreton, Guillaume |
author_sort | Le Guyader, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS: Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78260592021-01-25 Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France Le Guyader, Alexandre Pernot, Mathieu Delmas, Clément Roze, Stéphane Fau, Isabelle Flecher, Erwan Lebreton, Guillaume Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS: Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO. Dove 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7826059/ /pubmed/33500641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269 Text en © 2021 Le Guyader et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Le Guyader, Alexandre Pernot, Mathieu Delmas, Clément Roze, Stéphane Fau, Isabelle Flecher, Erwan Lebreton, Guillaume Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title | Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title_full | Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title_fullStr | Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title_short | Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France |
title_sort | budget impact associated with the introduction of the impella 5.0(®) mechanical circulatory support device for cardiogenic shock in france |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leguyaderalexandre budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT pernotmathieu budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT delmasclement budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT rozestephane budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT fauisabelle budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT flechererwan budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance AT lebretonguillaume budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance |