Cargando…

Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France

AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Guyader, Alexandre, Pernot, Mathieu, Delmas, Clément, Roze, Stéphane, Fau, Isabelle, Flecher, Erwan, Lebreton, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500641
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269
_version_ 1783640451852533760
author Le Guyader, Alexandre
Pernot, Mathieu
Delmas, Clément
Roze, Stéphane
Fau, Isabelle
Flecher, Erwan
Lebreton, Guillaume
author_facet Le Guyader, Alexandre
Pernot, Mathieu
Delmas, Clément
Roze, Stéphane
Fau, Isabelle
Flecher, Erwan
Lebreton, Guillaume
author_sort Le Guyader, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS: Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7826059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78260592021-01-25 Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France Le Guyader, Alexandre Pernot, Mathieu Delmas, Clément Roze, Stéphane Fau, Isabelle Flecher, Erwan Lebreton, Guillaume Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research AIM: Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0(®), a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters. RESULTS: Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO. Dove 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7826059/ /pubmed/33500641 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269 Text en © 2021 Le Guyader et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Le Guyader, Alexandre
Pernot, Mathieu
Delmas, Clément
Roze, Stéphane
Fau, Isabelle
Flecher, Erwan
Lebreton, Guillaume
Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title_full Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title_fullStr Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title_full_unstemmed Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title_short Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0(®) Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France
title_sort budget impact associated with the introduction of the impella 5.0(®) mechanical circulatory support device for cardiogenic shock in france
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500641
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S278269
work_keys_str_mv AT leguyaderalexandre budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT pernotmathieu budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT delmasclement budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT rozestephane budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT fauisabelle budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT flechererwan budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance
AT lebretonguillaume budgetimpactassociatedwiththeintroductionoftheimpella50mechanicalcirculatorysupportdeviceforcardiogenicshockinfrance