Cargando…
Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences
Traditional epitranscriptomics relies on capturing a single RNA modification by antibody or chemical treatment, combined with short-read sequencing to identify its transcriptomic location. This approach is labor-intensive and may introduce experimental artifacts. Direct sequencing of native RNA usin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa620 |
_version_ | 1783640495887482880 |
---|---|
author | Jenjaroenpun, Piroon Wongsurawat, Thidathip Wadley, Taylor D Wassenaar, Trudy M Liu, Jun Dai, Qing Wanchai, Visanu Akel, Nisreen S Jamshidi-Parsian, Azemat Franco, Aime T Boysen, Gunnar Jennings, Michael L Ussery, David W He, Chuan Nookaew, Intawat |
author_facet | Jenjaroenpun, Piroon Wongsurawat, Thidathip Wadley, Taylor D Wassenaar, Trudy M Liu, Jun Dai, Qing Wanchai, Visanu Akel, Nisreen S Jamshidi-Parsian, Azemat Franco, Aime T Boysen, Gunnar Jennings, Michael L Ussery, David W He, Chuan Nookaew, Intawat |
author_sort | Jenjaroenpun, Piroon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional epitranscriptomics relies on capturing a single RNA modification by antibody or chemical treatment, combined with short-read sequencing to identify its transcriptomic location. This approach is labor-intensive and may introduce experimental artifacts. Direct sequencing of native RNA using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) can allow for directly detecting the RNA base modifications, although these modifications might appear as sequencing errors. The percent Error of Specific Bases (%ESB) was higher for native RNA than unmodified RNA, which enabled the detection of ribonucleotide modification sites. Based on the %ESB differences, we developed a bioinformatic tool, epitranscriptional landscape inferring from glitches of ONT signals (ELIGOS), that is based on various types of synthetic modified RNA and applied to rRNA and mRNA. ELIGOS is able to accurately predict known classes of RNA methylation sites (AUC > 0.93) in rRNAs from Escherichiacoli, yeast, and human cells, using either unmodified in vitro transcription RNA or a background error model, which mimics the systematic error of direct RNA sequencing as the reference. The well-known DRACH/RRACH motif was localized and identified, consistent with previous studies, using differential analysis of ELIGOS to study the impact of RNA m(6)A methyltransferase by comparing wild type and knockouts in yeast and mouse cells. Lastly, the DRACH motif could also be identified in the mRNA of three human cell lines. The mRNA modification identified by ELIGOS is at the level of individual base resolution. In summary, we have developed a bioinformatic software package to uncover native RNA modifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78262542021-01-27 Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences Jenjaroenpun, Piroon Wongsurawat, Thidathip Wadley, Taylor D Wassenaar, Trudy M Liu, Jun Dai, Qing Wanchai, Visanu Akel, Nisreen S Jamshidi-Parsian, Azemat Franco, Aime T Boysen, Gunnar Jennings, Michael L Ussery, David W He, Chuan Nookaew, Intawat Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online Traditional epitranscriptomics relies on capturing a single RNA modification by antibody or chemical treatment, combined with short-read sequencing to identify its transcriptomic location. This approach is labor-intensive and may introduce experimental artifacts. Direct sequencing of native RNA using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) can allow for directly detecting the RNA base modifications, although these modifications might appear as sequencing errors. The percent Error of Specific Bases (%ESB) was higher for native RNA than unmodified RNA, which enabled the detection of ribonucleotide modification sites. Based on the %ESB differences, we developed a bioinformatic tool, epitranscriptional landscape inferring from glitches of ONT signals (ELIGOS), that is based on various types of synthetic modified RNA and applied to rRNA and mRNA. ELIGOS is able to accurately predict known classes of RNA methylation sites (AUC > 0.93) in rRNAs from Escherichiacoli, yeast, and human cells, using either unmodified in vitro transcription RNA or a background error model, which mimics the systematic error of direct RNA sequencing as the reference. The well-known DRACH/RRACH motif was localized and identified, consistent with previous studies, using differential analysis of ELIGOS to study the impact of RNA m(6)A methyltransferase by comparing wild type and knockouts in yeast and mouse cells. Lastly, the DRACH motif could also be identified in the mRNA of three human cell lines. The mRNA modification identified by ELIGOS is at the level of individual base resolution. In summary, we have developed a bioinformatic software package to uncover native RNA modifications. Oxford University Press 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7826254/ /pubmed/32710622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa620 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Methods Online Jenjaroenpun, Piroon Wongsurawat, Thidathip Wadley, Taylor D Wassenaar, Trudy M Liu, Jun Dai, Qing Wanchai, Visanu Akel, Nisreen S Jamshidi-Parsian, Azemat Franco, Aime T Boysen, Gunnar Jennings, Michael L Ussery, David W He, Chuan Nookaew, Intawat Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title | Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title_full | Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title_fullStr | Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title_short | Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences |
title_sort | decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native rna sequences |
topic | Methods Online |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenjaroenpunpiroon decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT wongsurawatthidathip decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT wadleytaylord decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT wassenaartrudym decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT liujun decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT daiqing decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT wanchaivisanu decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT akelnisreens decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT jamshidiparsianazemat decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT francoaimet decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT boysengunnar decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT jenningsmichaell decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT usserydavidw decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT hechuan decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences AT nookaewintawat decodingtheepitranscriptionallandscapefromnativernasequences |