Cargando…

Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction is mainly based on psychophysical measurements. The aim of the current study was to investigate how well the olfactory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can effectively distinguish between normosmic people and subjects with olfactory dysfunc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yunpeng, Zang, Han, Pengfei, Joshi, Akshita, Hummel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06233-y
_version_ 1783640506650066944
author Yunpeng, Zang
Han, Pengfei
Joshi, Akshita
Hummel, Thomas
author_facet Yunpeng, Zang
Han, Pengfei
Joshi, Akshita
Hummel, Thomas
author_sort Yunpeng, Zang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction is mainly based on psychophysical measurements. The aim of the current study was to investigate how well the olfactory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can effectively distinguish between normosmic people and subjects with olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants were recruited for the study. Group 1 consisted of 22 subjects with olfactory dysfunction (mean age = 44.3 years, SD = 18.6), and Group two consisted of 16 participants with normal olfactory function (mean age = 49.6 years, SD = 11.6). Olfactory functions were assessed in great detail for all participants, and brain activation in response to odorous stimulation was assessed using fMRI. RESULTS: The between-group comparison showed stronger odor induced brain activation of the primary olfactory area and the insular cortex among the normosmic group as compared to the dysosmic group. As indicated by the individual analysis, positive responses in the primary olfactory cortex were significantly higher in normosmic people (94%) than in subjects with olfactory dysfunction (41%). However, there was no association between individual fMRI parameters (including the percentage of BOLD signal change, activated cluster size and peak z value), and psychophysical olfactory test scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested the subjects could not be differentiated from normosmics based on their BOLD signal from the primary olfactory area, orbitofrontal cortex, or the insular cortex. CONCLUSION: There are large inter-individual variabilities for odor-induced brain activation among normosmic subjects and subjects with olfactory dysfunction, due to this variation, at present it appears problematic to diagnose olfactory dysfunction on an individual level using fMRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7826297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78262972021-02-11 Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction Yunpeng, Zang Han, Pengfei Joshi, Akshita Hummel, Thomas Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Rhinology PURPOSE: The diagnosis of olfactory dysfunction is mainly based on psychophysical measurements. The aim of the current study was to investigate how well the olfactory functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can effectively distinguish between normosmic people and subjects with olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants were recruited for the study. Group 1 consisted of 22 subjects with olfactory dysfunction (mean age = 44.3 years, SD = 18.6), and Group two consisted of 16 participants with normal olfactory function (mean age = 49.6 years, SD = 11.6). Olfactory functions were assessed in great detail for all participants, and brain activation in response to odorous stimulation was assessed using fMRI. RESULTS: The between-group comparison showed stronger odor induced brain activation of the primary olfactory area and the insular cortex among the normosmic group as compared to the dysosmic group. As indicated by the individual analysis, positive responses in the primary olfactory cortex were significantly higher in normosmic people (94%) than in subjects with olfactory dysfunction (41%). However, there was no association between individual fMRI parameters (including the percentage of BOLD signal change, activated cluster size and peak z value), and psychophysical olfactory test scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested the subjects could not be differentiated from normosmics based on their BOLD signal from the primary olfactory area, orbitofrontal cortex, or the insular cortex. CONCLUSION: There are large inter-individual variabilities for odor-induced brain activation among normosmic subjects and subjects with olfactory dysfunction, due to this variation, at present it appears problematic to diagnose olfactory dysfunction on an individual level using fMRI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7826297/ /pubmed/32803385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06233-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rhinology
Yunpeng, Zang
Han, Pengfei
Joshi, Akshita
Hummel, Thomas
Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title_full Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title_fullStr Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title_short Individual variability of olfactory fMRI in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
title_sort individual variability of olfactory fmri in normosmia and olfactory dysfunction
topic Rhinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06233-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yunpengzang individualvariabilityofolfactoryfmriinnormosmiaandolfactorydysfunction
AT hanpengfei individualvariabilityofolfactoryfmriinnormosmiaandolfactorydysfunction
AT joshiakshita individualvariabilityofolfactoryfmriinnormosmiaandolfactorydysfunction
AT hummelthomas individualvariabilityofolfactoryfmriinnormosmiaandolfactorydysfunction