Cargando…

A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables

The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks’ theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a [Formula: see text] distribution with degrees o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yunxiao, Moustaki, Irini, Zhang, Haoran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09735-0
_version_ 1783640512244219904
author Chen, Yunxiao
Moustaki, Irini
Zhang, Haoran
author_facet Chen, Yunxiao
Moustaki, Irini
Zhang, Haoran
author_sort Chen, Yunxiao
collection PubMed
description The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks’ theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a [Formula: see text] distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two nested models under comparison. For models with latent variables such as factor analysis, structural equation models and random effects models, however, it is often found that the [Formula: see text] approximation does not hold. In this note, we show how the regularity conditions of Wilks’ theorem may be violated using three examples of models with latent variables. In addition, a more general theory for LRT is given that provides the correct asymptotic theory for these LRTs. This general theory was first established in Chernoff (J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 45:404–413, 1954) and discussed in both van der Vaart (Asymptotic statistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000) and Drton (Ann Stat 37:979–1012, 2009), but it does not seem to have received enough attention. We illustrate this general theory with the three examples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11336-020-09735-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7826319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78263192021-02-11 A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables Chen, Yunxiao Moustaki, Irini Zhang, Haoran Psychometrika Theory and Methods The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks’ theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a [Formula: see text] distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two nested models under comparison. For models with latent variables such as factor analysis, structural equation models and random effects models, however, it is often found that the [Formula: see text] approximation does not hold. In this note, we show how the regularity conditions of Wilks’ theorem may be violated using three examples of models with latent variables. In addition, a more general theory for LRT is given that provides the correct asymptotic theory for these LRTs. This general theory was first established in Chernoff (J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 45:404–413, 1954) and discussed in both van der Vaart (Asymptotic statistics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000) and Drton (Ann Stat 37:979–1012, 2009), but it does not seem to have received enough attention. We illustrate this general theory with the three examples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11336-020-09735-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-12-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7826319/ /pubmed/33346885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09735-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Theory and Methods
Chen, Yunxiao
Moustaki, Irini
Zhang, Haoran
A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title_full A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title_fullStr A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title_full_unstemmed A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title_short A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
title_sort note on likelihood ratio tests for models with latent variables
topic Theory and Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09735-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyunxiao anoteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables
AT moustakiirini anoteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables
AT zhanghaoran anoteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables
AT chenyunxiao noteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables
AT moustakiirini noteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables
AT zhanghaoran noteonlikelihoodratiotestsformodelswithlatentvariables