Cargando…
Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
BACKGROUND: Although the latest Gleason grading system in 2014 has distinguished between Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3, Gleason 8 and Gleason 9–10 are remained systemically classified. METHODS: A total of 261,125 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) were selected between 2005 and 2015 from the Su...
Autores principales: | Zhou, Yuan, Lin, Changming, Hu, Zhihua, Yang, Cheng, Zhang, Rentao, Ding, Yinman, Wang, Zhengquan, Tao, Sha, Qin, Yanmei |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33135335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3571 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prognostic nomograms and Aggtrmmns scoring system for predicting overall survival and cancer‐specific survival of patients with kidney cancer
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Androgen deprivation therapy and Gleason grade: unravelling implications on survival
por: Scott, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
por: Zelic, Renata, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The impact of previous cancer on overall survival of bladder cancer patients and the establishment of nomogram for overall survival prediction
por: Wang, Zhengquan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)