Cargando…
In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
The soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory throug...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21020447 |
_version_ | 1783640552406777856 |
---|---|
author | Zeitoun, Reem Vandergeest, Mark Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Machado, Pedro Vitor Ferrari Jordan, Sean Parkin, Gary Wagner-Riddle, Claudia Biswas, Asim |
author_facet | Zeitoun, Reem Vandergeest, Mark Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Machado, Pedro Vitor Ferrari Jordan, Sean Parkin, Gary Wagner-Riddle, Claudia Biswas, Asim |
author_sort | Zeitoun, Reem |
collection | PubMed |
description | The soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory through cumbersome and time-intensive methods, soil sensors measuring in-situ θ and ψ show strong potential to estimate in-situ SWRC. The objective of this study was to estimate in-situ SWRC at different depths under two different soil types by integrating measured θ and ψ using two commercial sensors: time-domain reflectometer (TDR) and dielectric field water potential (e.g., MPS-6) principles. Parametric models were used to quantify θ—ψ relationships at various depths and were compared to laboratory-measured SWRC. The results of the study show that combining TDR and MPS-6 sensors can be used to estimate plant-available water and SWRC, with a mean difference of −0.03 to 0.23 m(3)m(−3) between the modeled data and laboratory data, which could be caused by the sensors’ lack of site-specific calibration or possible air entrapment of field soil. However, consistent trends (with magnitude differences) indicated the potential to use these sensors in estimating in-situ and dynamic SWRC at depths and provided a way forward in overcoming resource-intensive laboratory measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78265712021-01-25 In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths Zeitoun, Reem Vandergeest, Mark Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Machado, Pedro Vitor Ferrari Jordan, Sean Parkin, Gary Wagner-Riddle, Claudia Biswas, Asim Sensors (Basel) Article The soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory through cumbersome and time-intensive methods, soil sensors measuring in-situ θ and ψ show strong potential to estimate in-situ SWRC. The objective of this study was to estimate in-situ SWRC at different depths under two different soil types by integrating measured θ and ψ using two commercial sensors: time-domain reflectometer (TDR) and dielectric field water potential (e.g., MPS-6) principles. Parametric models were used to quantify θ—ψ relationships at various depths and were compared to laboratory-measured SWRC. The results of the study show that combining TDR and MPS-6 sensors can be used to estimate plant-available water and SWRC, with a mean difference of −0.03 to 0.23 m(3)m(−3) between the modeled data and laboratory data, which could be caused by the sensors’ lack of site-specific calibration or possible air entrapment of field soil. However, consistent trends (with magnitude differences) indicated the potential to use these sensors in estimating in-situ and dynamic SWRC at depths and provided a way forward in overcoming resource-intensive laboratory measurements. MDPI 2021-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7826571/ /pubmed/33435201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21020447 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zeitoun, Reem Vandergeest, Mark Vasava, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Machado, Pedro Vitor Ferrari Jordan, Sean Parkin, Gary Wagner-Riddle, Claudia Biswas, Asim In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title | In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title_full | In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title_fullStr | In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title_full_unstemmed | In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title_short | In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths |
title_sort | in-situ estimation of soil water retention curve in silt loam and loamy sand soils at different soil depths |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21020447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeitounreem insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT vandergeestmark insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT vasavahiteshkumarbhogilal insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT machadopedrovitorferrari insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT jordansean insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT parkingary insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT wagnerriddleclaudia insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths AT biswasasim insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths |