Cargando…

Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases

Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmermann, Lea, Biebl, Matthias, Schmelzle, Moritz, Bahra, Marcus, Malinka, Thomas, Pratschke, Johann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229
_version_ 1783640557083426816
author Timmermann, Lea
Biebl, Matthias
Schmelzle, Moritz
Bahra, Marcus
Malinka, Thomas
Pratschke, Johann
author_facet Timmermann, Lea
Biebl, Matthias
Schmelzle, Moritz
Bahra, Marcus
Malinka, Thomas
Pratschke, Johann
author_sort Timmermann, Lea
collection PubMed
description Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 consecutive robotic pancreatic resection performed at our center. Distal pancreatectomies (RDP, N = 44), total pancreatectomies (RTP, N = 3) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD, N = 54) were included. Malignancy was found in 45.5% (RDP), 66.7% (RTP) and 61% (RPD). Procedure times decreased from the first to the second half of the cohort for RDP (218 min vs. 128 min, p = 0.02) and RPD (378 min vs. 271 min, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 63%, 33% and 66% for RPD, RPT and RDP, respectively. Reintervention and reoperation rates were 41% and 17% (RPD), 33% and 0% (RTP) and 50% and 11.4% (RPD), respectively. The thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% for RPD and nil for RTP and RDP. Overall complication rate remained stable throughout the study period. In this series, implementation of robotic pancreas surgery was safe and feasible. Final evaluation of the anastomoses through the median retrieval incision compensated for the lack of haptic feedback during reconstruction and allowed for secure minimally invasive resection and reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7826591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78265912021-01-25 Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases Timmermann, Lea Biebl, Matthias Schmelzle, Moritz Bahra, Marcus Malinka, Thomas Pratschke, Johann J Clin Med Article Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 consecutive robotic pancreatic resection performed at our center. Distal pancreatectomies (RDP, N = 44), total pancreatectomies (RTP, N = 3) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD, N = 54) were included. Malignancy was found in 45.5% (RDP), 66.7% (RTP) and 61% (RPD). Procedure times decreased from the first to the second half of the cohort for RDP (218 min vs. 128 min, p = 0.02) and RPD (378 min vs. 271 min, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 63%, 33% and 66% for RPD, RPT and RDP, respectively. Reintervention and reoperation rates were 41% and 17% (RPD), 33% and 0% (RTP) and 50% and 11.4% (RPD), respectively. The thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% for RPD and nil for RTP and RDP. Overall complication rate remained stable throughout the study period. In this series, implementation of robotic pancreas surgery was safe and feasible. Final evaluation of the anastomoses through the median retrieval incision compensated for the lack of haptic feedback during reconstruction and allowed for secure minimally invasive resection and reconstruction. MDPI 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7826591/ /pubmed/33440608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Timmermann, Lea
Biebl, Matthias
Schmelzle, Moritz
Bahra, Marcus
Malinka, Thomas
Pratschke, Johann
Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title_full Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title_fullStr Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title_short Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
title_sort implementation of robotic assistance in pancreatic surgery: experiences from the first 101 consecutive cases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermannlea implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases
AT bieblmatthias implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases
AT schmelzlemoritz implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases
AT bahramarcus implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases
AT malinkathomas implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases
AT pratschkejohann implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases