Cargando…
Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases
Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229 |
_version_ | 1783640557083426816 |
---|---|
author | Timmermann, Lea Biebl, Matthias Schmelzle, Moritz Bahra, Marcus Malinka, Thomas Pratschke, Johann |
author_facet | Timmermann, Lea Biebl, Matthias Schmelzle, Moritz Bahra, Marcus Malinka, Thomas Pratschke, Johann |
author_sort | Timmermann, Lea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 consecutive robotic pancreatic resection performed at our center. Distal pancreatectomies (RDP, N = 44), total pancreatectomies (RTP, N = 3) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD, N = 54) were included. Malignancy was found in 45.5% (RDP), 66.7% (RTP) and 61% (RPD). Procedure times decreased from the first to the second half of the cohort for RDP (218 min vs. 128 min, p = 0.02) and RPD (378 min vs. 271 min, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 63%, 33% and 66% for RPD, RPT and RDP, respectively. Reintervention and reoperation rates were 41% and 17% (RPD), 33% and 0% (RTP) and 50% and 11.4% (RPD), respectively. The thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% for RPD and nil for RTP and RDP. Overall complication rate remained stable throughout the study period. In this series, implementation of robotic pancreas surgery was safe and feasible. Final evaluation of the anastomoses through the median retrieval incision compensated for the lack of haptic feedback during reconstruction and allowed for secure minimally invasive resection and reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78265912021-01-25 Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases Timmermann, Lea Biebl, Matthias Schmelzle, Moritz Bahra, Marcus Malinka, Thomas Pratschke, Johann J Clin Med Article Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery has been implemented to overcome typical limitations of conventional laparoscopy such as lack of angulation, especially during creation of biliary and pancreatic anastomoses. With this retrospective analysis, we provide our experience with the first 101 consecutive robotic pancreatic resection performed at our center. Distal pancreatectomies (RDP, N = 44), total pancreatectomies (RTP, N = 3) and pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD, N = 54) were included. Malignancy was found in 45.5% (RDP), 66.7% (RTP) and 61% (RPD). Procedure times decreased from the first to the second half of the cohort for RDP (218 min vs. 128 min, p = 0.02) and RPD (378 min vs. 271 min, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate was 63%, 33% and 66% for RPD, RPT and RDP, respectively. Reintervention and reoperation rates were 41% and 17% (RPD), 33% and 0% (RTP) and 50% and 11.4% (RPD), respectively. The thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% for RPD and nil for RTP and RDP. Overall complication rate remained stable throughout the study period. In this series, implementation of robotic pancreas surgery was safe and feasible. Final evaluation of the anastomoses through the median retrieval incision compensated for the lack of haptic feedback during reconstruction and allowed for secure minimally invasive resection and reconstruction. MDPI 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7826591/ /pubmed/33440608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Timmermann, Lea Biebl, Matthias Schmelzle, Moritz Bahra, Marcus Malinka, Thomas Pratschke, Johann Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title | Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title_full | Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title_fullStr | Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title_short | Implementation of Robotic Assistance in Pancreatic Surgery: Experiences from the First 101 Consecutive Cases |
title_sort | implementation of robotic assistance in pancreatic surgery: experiences from the first 101 consecutive cases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmermannlea implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases AT bieblmatthias implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases AT schmelzlemoritz implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases AT bahramarcus implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases AT malinkathomas implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases AT pratschkejohann implementationofroboticassistanceinpancreaticsurgeryexperiencesfromthefirst101consecutivecases |