Cargando…
The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a frequent and poor prognosis tumor, with most patients facing up, soon or later, to systemic therapies. So far, systemic therapies based on tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapies have been of modest benefit. The aim of this review article was to characte...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020238 |
_version_ | 1783640636271886336 |
---|---|
author | Merle, Philippe |
author_facet | Merle, Philippe |
author_sort | Merle, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a frequent and poor prognosis tumor, with most patients facing up, soon or later, to systemic therapies. So far, systemic therapies based on tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapies have been of modest benefit. The aim of this review article was to characterize the profile of efficacy and safety of immuno-oncology-based monotherapies that failed to demonstrate significant benefit, for comparison with the immuno-oncology-based combinational strategies. One of them has proven its drastic benefit in phase-3, whereas others have only shown promising data in phase-1/2, although the corresponding phase-3 results are pending. We showed that objective response rates and duration of response are important parameters for increased median overall survival and long survivals. We also pointed out that, being aware that there is an urgent unmet need for biomarkers, the pattern of safety and quality of life will guide the physician for the choice on the possible future combinations. ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a poor prognosis tumor. Systemic therapies are frequently used due to frequent recurrences after surgical or radiologic treatments. Anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown efficacy in monotherapy, but with very low rates of long survival and exceptional recovery. Immuno-oncology based on immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the systemic therapies since showing long survival rates without any tumor progression or recurrence for some patients in partial or complete response, and possibly for some patients in stable disease. However, the rate of responders under immuno-oncology monotherapy is too low to increase significantly the median overall survival of the treated patients. The immuno-oncology-based combinations with different types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, tremelimumab), or the association of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents (bevacizumab, lenvatinib, cabozantinib), have led to a breakthrough in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Indeed, the first phase-3 trial, combining atezolizumab with bevacizumab, has dramatically changed the outcome of patients. Data from several other types of combinations assessed in phase-3 trials are pending, and if positive, will drastically arm the physicians to efficiently treat the patients, and disrupt the current algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7826922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78269222021-01-25 The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Merle, Philippe Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a frequent and poor prognosis tumor, with most patients facing up, soon or later, to systemic therapies. So far, systemic therapies based on tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapies have been of modest benefit. The aim of this review article was to characterize the profile of efficacy and safety of immuno-oncology-based monotherapies that failed to demonstrate significant benefit, for comparison with the immuno-oncology-based combinational strategies. One of them has proven its drastic benefit in phase-3, whereas others have only shown promising data in phase-1/2, although the corresponding phase-3 results are pending. We showed that objective response rates and duration of response are important parameters for increased median overall survival and long survivals. We also pointed out that, being aware that there is an urgent unmet need for biomarkers, the pattern of safety and quality of life will guide the physician for the choice on the possible future combinations. ABSTRACT: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a poor prognosis tumor. Systemic therapies are frequently used due to frequent recurrences after surgical or radiologic treatments. Anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown efficacy in monotherapy, but with very low rates of long survival and exceptional recovery. Immuno-oncology based on immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the systemic therapies since showing long survival rates without any tumor progression or recurrence for some patients in partial or complete response, and possibly for some patients in stable disease. However, the rate of responders under immuno-oncology monotherapy is too low to increase significantly the median overall survival of the treated patients. The immuno-oncology-based combinations with different types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, tremelimumab), or the association of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents (bevacizumab, lenvatinib, cabozantinib), have led to a breakthrough in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Indeed, the first phase-3 trial, combining atezolizumab with bevacizumab, has dramatically changed the outcome of patients. Data from several other types of combinations assessed in phase-3 trials are pending, and if positive, will drastically arm the physicians to efficiently treat the patients, and disrupt the current algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. MDPI 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7826922/ /pubmed/33440630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020238 Text en © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Merle, Philippe The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | The New Immuno-Oncology-Based Therapies and Their Perspectives in Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | new immuno-oncology-based therapies and their perspectives in hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33440630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13020238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merlephilippe thenewimmunooncologybasedtherapiesandtheirperspectivesinhepatocellularcarcinoma AT merlephilippe newimmunooncologybasedtherapiesandtheirperspectivesinhepatocellularcarcinoma |