Cargando…

Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

(1) Background: Prior studies suggested a significant impact of previous live births on peripheral natural killer cells (pNK) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Patients with primary RPL (pRPL, no live birth) showed higher numbers of pNK than secondary RPL patients (sRPL, ≥ 1 live birt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strobel, Laura, Vomstein, Kilian, Kyvelidou, Christiana, Hofer-Tollinger, Susanne, Feil, Katharina, Kuon, Ruben-Jeremias, Ebner, Susanne, Troppmair, Jakob, Toth, Bettina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020194
_version_ 1783640652133695488
author Strobel, Laura
Vomstein, Kilian
Kyvelidou, Christiana
Hofer-Tollinger, Susanne
Feil, Katharina
Kuon, Ruben-Jeremias
Ebner, Susanne
Troppmair, Jakob
Toth, Bettina
author_facet Strobel, Laura
Vomstein, Kilian
Kyvelidou, Christiana
Hofer-Tollinger, Susanne
Feil, Katharina
Kuon, Ruben-Jeremias
Ebner, Susanne
Troppmair, Jakob
Toth, Bettina
author_sort Strobel, Laura
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Prior studies suggested a significant impact of previous live births on peripheral natural killer cells (pNK) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Patients with primary RPL (pRPL, no live birth) showed higher numbers of pNK than secondary RPL patients (sRPL, ≥ 1 live birth). (2) Methods: To further determine immunological differences between RPL patients and controls, we analysed pNK subpopulations and activation markers in pRPL (n = 47), sRPL (n = 24) and controls with previous live birth (sCtrl, n = 25) and nullipara (pCtrl, n = 60) within a prospective study. Percentages and numbers of CD56(dim)CD16(bright) cells, subpopulations and activation markers (CD57+, CD62L+, NKG2D+, NKp46+) were measured in non-pregnant RPL patients and n = 85 controls (n = 60 pCtrl, n = 25 sCtrl) in the mid-luteal phase by flow cytometry. (3) Results: Compared to sRPL patients, sCtrls showed higher CD56(+) and CD56(dim)CD16(bright) numbers. Further, sRPL patients showed lower numbers of CD56(dim)CD16(bright)NKG2D(+) and CD56(dim)CD16(bright)NKp46(+) than sCtrls. (4) Conclusion: We suggest a chronic immune stimulation leading to a lower NK-cell count in sRPL patients with a lower NK cytotoxicity. This underlines the necessity to investigate pNK subpopulations as well as pRPL and sRPL separately to delineate the immune alterations in RPL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7826987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78269872021-01-25 Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Strobel, Laura Vomstein, Kilian Kyvelidou, Christiana Hofer-Tollinger, Susanne Feil, Katharina Kuon, Ruben-Jeremias Ebner, Susanne Troppmair, Jakob Toth, Bettina J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Prior studies suggested a significant impact of previous live births on peripheral natural killer cells (pNK) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Patients with primary RPL (pRPL, no live birth) showed higher numbers of pNK than secondary RPL patients (sRPL, ≥ 1 live birth). (2) Methods: To further determine immunological differences between RPL patients and controls, we analysed pNK subpopulations and activation markers in pRPL (n = 47), sRPL (n = 24) and controls with previous live birth (sCtrl, n = 25) and nullipara (pCtrl, n = 60) within a prospective study. Percentages and numbers of CD56(dim)CD16(bright) cells, subpopulations and activation markers (CD57+, CD62L+, NKG2D+, NKp46+) were measured in non-pregnant RPL patients and n = 85 controls (n = 60 pCtrl, n = 25 sCtrl) in the mid-luteal phase by flow cytometry. (3) Results: Compared to sRPL patients, sCtrls showed higher CD56(+) and CD56(dim)CD16(bright) numbers. Further, sRPL patients showed lower numbers of CD56(dim)CD16(bright)NKG2D(+) and CD56(dim)CD16(bright)NKp46(+) than sCtrls. (4) Conclusion: We suggest a chronic immune stimulation leading to a lower NK-cell count in sRPL patients with a lower NK cytotoxicity. This underlines the necessity to investigate pNK subpopulations as well as pRPL and sRPL separately to delineate the immune alterations in RPL. MDPI 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7826987/ /pubmed/33430491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020194 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Strobel, Laura
Vomstein, Kilian
Kyvelidou, Christiana
Hofer-Tollinger, Susanne
Feil, Katharina
Kuon, Ruben-Jeremias
Ebner, Susanne
Troppmair, Jakob
Toth, Bettina
Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_fullStr Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full_unstemmed Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_short Different Background: Natural Killer Cell Profiles in Secondary versus Primary Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_sort different background: natural killer cell profiles in secondary versus primary recurrent pregnancy loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020194
work_keys_str_mv AT strobellaura differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT vomsteinkilian differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT kyvelidouchristiana differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT hofertollingersusanne differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT feilkatharina differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT kuonrubenjeremias differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT ebnersusanne differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT troppmairjakob differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT tothbettina differentbackgroundnaturalkillercellprofilesinsecondaryversusprimaryrecurrentpregnancyloss