Cargando…
An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005 |
_version_ | 1783640655752331264 |
---|---|
author | Krischik, Dirk Tokgöz, Selen Ergin van Orten, Andreas Friedmann, Anton Bilhan, Hakan |
author_facet | Krischik, Dirk Tokgöz, Selen Ergin van Orten, Andreas Friedmann, Anton Bilhan, Hakan |
author_sort | Krischik, Dirk |
collection | PubMed |
description | The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implants with differing thread designs. A total of 11 implants of each group were inserted in the part of the fresh bovine ribs, corresponding to very soft bone. The primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest; the average of two measurements for each method and for each implant was taken and statistical analysis was applied. The highest stability values were obtained with the ICX Active Master implants, followed by the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants placed with the very soft bone protocol. The primary stability values of the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants inserted by the very soft bone protocol and the ICX Active Master implants placed with the standard protocol showed sufficient stability for immediate loading in low-density bone. Within the limitations of this study, the thread design of the implants and underdimensioned implant bed preparation seem to be effective for better primary stability in cancellous bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7827002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78270022021-01-25 An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone Krischik, Dirk Tokgöz, Selen Ergin van Orten, Andreas Friedmann, Anton Bilhan, Hakan Dent J (Basel) Article The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implants with differing thread designs. A total of 11 implants of each group were inserted in the part of the fresh bovine ribs, corresponding to very soft bone. The primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest; the average of two measurements for each method and for each implant was taken and statistical analysis was applied. The highest stability values were obtained with the ICX Active Master implants, followed by the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants placed with the very soft bone protocol. The primary stability values of the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants inserted by the very soft bone protocol and the ICX Active Master implants placed with the standard protocol showed sufficient stability for immediate loading in low-density bone. Within the limitations of this study, the thread design of the implants and underdimensioned implant bed preparation seem to be effective for better primary stability in cancellous bone. MDPI 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7827002/ /pubmed/33430004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Krischik, Dirk Tokgöz, Selen Ergin van Orten, Andreas Friedmann, Anton Bilhan, Hakan An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title | An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title_full | An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title_fullStr | An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title_full_unstemmed | An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title_short | An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of primary stability values for two differently designed implants to suit immediate loading in very soft bone |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krischikdirk aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT tokgozselenergin aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT vanortenandreas aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT friedmannanton aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT bilhanhakan aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT krischikdirk invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT tokgozselenergin invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT vanortenandreas invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT friedmannanton invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone AT bilhanhakan invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone |