Cargando…

An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone

The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krischik, Dirk, Tokgöz, Selen Ergin, van Orten, Andreas, Friedmann, Anton, Bilhan, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005
_version_ 1783640655752331264
author Krischik, Dirk
Tokgöz, Selen Ergin
van Orten, Andreas
Friedmann, Anton
Bilhan, Hakan
author_facet Krischik, Dirk
Tokgöz, Selen Ergin
van Orten, Andreas
Friedmann, Anton
Bilhan, Hakan
author_sort Krischik, Dirk
collection PubMed
description The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implants with differing thread designs. A total of 11 implants of each group were inserted in the part of the fresh bovine ribs, corresponding to very soft bone. The primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest; the average of two measurements for each method and for each implant was taken and statistical analysis was applied. The highest stability values were obtained with the ICX Active Master implants, followed by the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants placed with the very soft bone protocol. The primary stability values of the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants inserted by the very soft bone protocol and the ICX Active Master implants placed with the standard protocol showed sufficient stability for immediate loading in low-density bone. Within the limitations of this study, the thread design of the implants and underdimensioned implant bed preparation seem to be effective for better primary stability in cancellous bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7827002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78270022021-01-25 An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone Krischik, Dirk Tokgöz, Selen Ergin van Orten, Andreas Friedmann, Anton Bilhan, Hakan Dent J (Basel) Article The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implants with differing thread designs. A total of 11 implants of each group were inserted in the part of the fresh bovine ribs, corresponding to very soft bone. The primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest; the average of two measurements for each method and for each implant was taken and statistical analysis was applied. The highest stability values were obtained with the ICX Active Master implants, followed by the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants placed with the very soft bone protocol. The primary stability values of the Conelog(®) Progressive-Line implants inserted by the very soft bone protocol and the ICX Active Master implants placed with the standard protocol showed sufficient stability for immediate loading in low-density bone. Within the limitations of this study, the thread design of the implants and underdimensioned implant bed preparation seem to be effective for better primary stability in cancellous bone. MDPI 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7827002/ /pubmed/33430004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Krischik, Dirk
Tokgöz, Selen Ergin
van Orten, Andreas
Friedmann, Anton
Bilhan, Hakan
An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title_full An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title_fullStr An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title_full_unstemmed An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title_short An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone
title_sort in vitro evaluation of primary stability values for two differently designed implants to suit immediate loading in very soft bone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj9010005
work_keys_str_mv AT krischikdirk aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT tokgozselenergin aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT vanortenandreas aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT friedmannanton aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT bilhanhakan aninvitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT krischikdirk invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT tokgozselenergin invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT vanortenandreas invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT friedmannanton invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone
AT bilhanhakan invitroevaluationofprimarystabilityvaluesfortwodifferentlydesignedimplantstosuitimmediateloadinginverysoftbone