Cargando…

Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence

In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia, Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos, Rawal, Sahil, Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33429888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020203
_version_ 1783640729803816960
author Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia
Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos
Rawal, Sahil
Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
author_facet Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia
Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos
Rawal, Sahil
Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
author_sort Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia
collection PubMed
description In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7827304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78273042021-01-25 Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos Rawal, Sahil Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P. J Clin Med Review In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies. MDPI 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7827304/ /pubmed/33429888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020203 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia
Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos
Rawal, Sahil
Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title_full Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title_fullStr Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title_short Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
title_sort treatment of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: what is the evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33429888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020203
work_keys_str_mv AT koufouelenievangelia treatmentofheartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionwhatistheevidence
AT arfarasmelainisangelos treatmentofheartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionwhatistheevidence
AT rawalsahil treatmentofheartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionwhatistheevidence
AT kalogeropoulosandreasp treatmentofheartfailurewithmidrangeejectionfractionwhatistheevidence