Cargando…
Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair
Efforts to use traditional native tissue strategies and reduce the use of meshes have been made in several countries. Combining native tissue repair with sufficient mesh applied apical repair might provide a means of effective treatment. The study group did perform and publish a randomized trial foc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020217 |
_version_ | 1783640734912479232 |
---|---|
author | Noé, Günter K. Schiermeier, Sven Papathemelis, Thomas Fuellers, Ulrich Khudyakov, Alexander Altmann, Harald-Hans Borowski, Stefan Morawski, Pawel P. Gantert, Markus De Vree, Bart Tkacz, Zbigniew Ugarteburu, Rodrigo Gil Anapolski, Michael |
author_facet | Noé, Günter K. Schiermeier, Sven Papathemelis, Thomas Fuellers, Ulrich Khudyakov, Alexander Altmann, Harald-Hans Borowski, Stefan Morawski, Pawel P. Gantert, Markus De Vree, Bart Tkacz, Zbigniew Ugarteburu, Rodrigo Gil Anapolski, Michael |
author_sort | Noé, Günter K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Efforts to use traditional native tissue strategies and reduce the use of meshes have been made in several countries. Combining native tissue repair with sufficient mesh applied apical repair might provide a means of effective treatment. The study group did perform and publish a randomized trial focusing on the combination of traditional native tissue repair with pectopexy or sacrocolpopexy and observed no severe or hitherto unknown risks for patients (Noé G.K. J Endourol 2015;29(2):210–215). The short-term follow-up of this international multicenter study carried out now is presented in this article. Material and Methods: Eleven clinics and 13 surgeons in four European counties participated in the trial. In order to ensure a standardized approach and obtain comparable data, all surgeons were obliged to follow a standardized approach for pectopexy, focusing on the area of fixation and the use of a prefabricated mesh (PVDF PRP 3 × 15 Dynamesh). The mesh was solely used for apical repair. All other clinically relevant defects were treated with native tissue repair. Colposuspension or TVT were used for the treatment of incontinence. Data were collected independently for 14 months on a secured server; 501 surgeries were registered and evaluated. Two hundred and sixty-four patients out of 479 (55.1%) returned for the physical examination and interview after 12–18 months. Main Outcome and Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 15 months. The overall success of apical repair was rated positively by 96.9%, and the satisfaction score was rated positively by 95.5%. A positive general recommendation was expressed by 95.1% of patients. Pelvic pressure was reduced in 95.2%, pain in 98.0%, and urgency in 86.0% of patients. No major complications, mesh exposure, or mesh complication occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: In clinical routine, pectopexy and concomitant surgery, mainly using native tissue approaches, resulted in high satisfaction rates and favorable clinical findings. The procedure may also be recommended for use by general urogynecological practitioners with experience in laparoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7827325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78273252021-01-25 Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair Noé, Günter K. Schiermeier, Sven Papathemelis, Thomas Fuellers, Ulrich Khudyakov, Alexander Altmann, Harald-Hans Borowski, Stefan Morawski, Pawel P. Gantert, Markus De Vree, Bart Tkacz, Zbigniew Ugarteburu, Rodrigo Gil Anapolski, Michael J Clin Med Article Efforts to use traditional native tissue strategies and reduce the use of meshes have been made in several countries. Combining native tissue repair with sufficient mesh applied apical repair might provide a means of effective treatment. The study group did perform and publish a randomized trial focusing on the combination of traditional native tissue repair with pectopexy or sacrocolpopexy and observed no severe or hitherto unknown risks for patients (Noé G.K. J Endourol 2015;29(2):210–215). The short-term follow-up of this international multicenter study carried out now is presented in this article. Material and Methods: Eleven clinics and 13 surgeons in four European counties participated in the trial. In order to ensure a standardized approach and obtain comparable data, all surgeons were obliged to follow a standardized approach for pectopexy, focusing on the area of fixation and the use of a prefabricated mesh (PVDF PRP 3 × 15 Dynamesh). The mesh was solely used for apical repair. All other clinically relevant defects were treated with native tissue repair. Colposuspension or TVT were used for the treatment of incontinence. Data were collected independently for 14 months on a secured server; 501 surgeries were registered and evaluated. Two hundred and sixty-four patients out of 479 (55.1%) returned for the physical examination and interview after 12–18 months. Main Outcome and Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 15 months. The overall success of apical repair was rated positively by 96.9%, and the satisfaction score was rated positively by 95.5%. A positive general recommendation was expressed by 95.1% of patients. Pelvic pressure was reduced in 95.2%, pain in 98.0%, and urgency in 86.0% of patients. No major complications, mesh exposure, or mesh complication occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: In clinical routine, pectopexy and concomitant surgery, mainly using native tissue approaches, resulted in high satisfaction rates and favorable clinical findings. The procedure may also be recommended for use by general urogynecological practitioners with experience in laparoscopy. MDPI 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7827325/ /pubmed/33435323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020217 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Noé, Günter K. Schiermeier, Sven Papathemelis, Thomas Fuellers, Ulrich Khudyakov, Alexander Altmann, Harald-Hans Borowski, Stefan Morawski, Pawel P. Gantert, Markus De Vree, Bart Tkacz, Zbigniew Ugarteburu, Rodrigo Gil Anapolski, Michael Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title | Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title_full | Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title_fullStr | Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title_short | Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair |
title_sort | prospective international multicenter pelvic floor study: short-term follow-up and clinical findings for combined pectopexy and native tissue repair |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noegunterk prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT schiermeiersven prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT papathemelisthomas prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT fuellersulrich prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT khudyakovalexander prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT altmannharaldhans prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT borowskistefan prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT morawskipawelp prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT gantertmarkus prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT devreebart prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT tkaczzbigniew prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT ugartebururodrigogil prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair AT anapolskimichael prospectiveinternationalmulticenterpelvicfloorstudyshorttermfollowupandclinicalfindingsforcombinedpectopexyandnativetissuerepair |