Cargando…

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review

To assess real-world outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed in order to identify publications assessing the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in DME in daily practice. Case reports and ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodjikian, Laurent, Baillif, Stephanie, Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine, Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle, Matonti, Frédéric, Weber, Michel, Mathis, Thibaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010072
_version_ 1783640784554164224
author Kodjikian, Laurent
Baillif, Stephanie
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Matonti, Frédéric
Weber, Michel
Mathis, Thibaud
author_facet Kodjikian, Laurent
Baillif, Stephanie
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Matonti, Frédéric
Weber, Michel
Mathis, Thibaud
author_sort Kodjikian, Laurent
collection PubMed
description To assess real-world outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed in order to identify publications assessing the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in DME in daily practice. Case reports and randomized controlled trials were excluded. Twenty-two observational real-world studies analyzing a total of 1880 eyes were included. Mean peak visual gain was +8.7 letters (11.3 months post-FAc injection) and was greater for lower baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and for more recent DME. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased 34.3% from baseline. 77.0% of the analyzed studies reported both BCVA improvement of at least five letters and a CRT decrease by 20% or more. Rescue therapy was needed more frequently when FAc was administered for chronic DME. FAc-induced ocular hypertension was reported in 20.1% of patients but only 0.6% needed surgery. Cataract extraction was performed in 43.2% of phakic patients. Adequate patient selection is essential for optimal FAc response and better safety profile. Currently positioned as second- or third-line treatment in the management algorithm, FAc implant decreases treatment burden and provides better letter gain when administered for more recent DME.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7827527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78275272021-01-25 Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review Kodjikian, Laurent Baillif, Stephanie Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Matonti, Frédéric Weber, Michel Mathis, Thibaud Pharmaceutics Review To assess real-world outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in treating diabetic macular edema (DME), a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed in order to identify publications assessing the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in DME in daily practice. Case reports and randomized controlled trials were excluded. Twenty-two observational real-world studies analyzing a total of 1880 eyes were included. Mean peak visual gain was +8.7 letters (11.3 months post-FAc injection) and was greater for lower baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and for more recent DME. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased 34.3% from baseline. 77.0% of the analyzed studies reported both BCVA improvement of at least five letters and a CRT decrease by 20% or more. Rescue therapy was needed more frequently when FAc was administered for chronic DME. FAc-induced ocular hypertension was reported in 20.1% of patients but only 0.6% needed surgery. Cataract extraction was performed in 43.2% of phakic patients. Adequate patient selection is essential for optimal FAc response and better safety profile. Currently positioned as second- or third-line treatment in the management algorithm, FAc implant decreases treatment burden and provides better letter gain when administered for more recent DME. MDPI 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7827527/ /pubmed/33430389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010072 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kodjikian, Laurent
Baillif, Stephanie
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Matonti, Frédéric
Weber, Michel
Mathis, Thibaud
Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title_full Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title_short Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review
title_sort real-world efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide implant for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010072
work_keys_str_mv AT kodjikianlaurent realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT baillifstephanie realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT creuzotgarchercatherine realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT delyfermarienoelle realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT matontifrederic realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT webermichel realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview
AT mathisthibaud realworldefficacyandsafetyoffluocinoloneacetonideimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaasystematicreview