Cargando…

The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting

Background: Most patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD). In spite of well-established treatment algorithms, NBD is often insufficiently managed. The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic bowel dysfunction Treatment On Response (MENTOR) has been validated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar, Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl, Emmanuel, Anton, Christensen, Peter, Krogh, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33445668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020263
_version_ 1783640929021722624
author Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar
Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
Emmanuel, Anton
Christensen, Peter
Krogh, Klaus
author_facet Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar
Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
Emmanuel, Anton
Christensen, Peter
Krogh, Klaus
author_sort Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar
collection PubMed
description Background: Most patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD). In spite of well-established treatment algorithms, NBD is often insufficiently managed. The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic bowel dysfunction Treatment On Response (MENTOR) has been validated in a hospital setting as a tool to support clinical decision making in individual patients. The objective of the present study was to describe clinical decisions recommended by the MENTOR (either “monitor”, “discuss” or “act”) and the use of the tool to monitor NBD in a non-hospital setting. Methods: A questionnaire describing background data, the MENTOR, ability to work and participation in various social activities was sent by mail to all members of The Danish Paraplegic Association. Results: Among 1316 members, 716 (54%) responded, 429 men (61%) and 278 women (39%), aged 18 to 92 (median 61) years. Based on MENTOR, the recommended clinical decision is to monitor treatment of NBD in 281 (44%), discuss change in treatment in 175 (27%) and act/change treatment in 181 (28%). A recommendation to discuss or change treatment was associated with increasing age of the respondent (p = 0.016) and with impaired ability to work or participate in social activities (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: A surprisingly high proportion of persons with SCI have an unmet need for improved bowel care. The MENTOR holds promise as a tool for evaluation of treatment of NBD in a non-hospital setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7828108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78281082021-01-25 The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl Emmanuel, Anton Christensen, Peter Krogh, Klaus J Clin Med Article Background: Most patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD). In spite of well-established treatment algorithms, NBD is often insufficiently managed. The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic bowel dysfunction Treatment On Response (MENTOR) has been validated in a hospital setting as a tool to support clinical decision making in individual patients. The objective of the present study was to describe clinical decisions recommended by the MENTOR (either “monitor”, “discuss” or “act”) and the use of the tool to monitor NBD in a non-hospital setting. Methods: A questionnaire describing background data, the MENTOR, ability to work and participation in various social activities was sent by mail to all members of The Danish Paraplegic Association. Results: Among 1316 members, 716 (54%) responded, 429 men (61%) and 278 women (39%), aged 18 to 92 (median 61) years. Based on MENTOR, the recommended clinical decision is to monitor treatment of NBD in 281 (44%), discuss change in treatment in 175 (27%) and act/change treatment in 181 (28%). A recommendation to discuss or change treatment was associated with increasing age of the respondent (p = 0.016) and with impaired ability to work or participate in social activities (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: A surprisingly high proportion of persons with SCI have an unmet need for improved bowel care. The MENTOR holds promise as a tool for evaluation of treatment of NBD in a non-hospital setting. MDPI 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7828108/ /pubmed/33445668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020263 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Studsgaard Slot, Sofie Dagmar
Baunwall, Simon Mark Dahl
Emmanuel, Anton
Christensen, Peter
Krogh, Klaus
The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title_full The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title_fullStr The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title_short The Monitoring Efficacy of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Treatment on Response (MENTOR) in a Non-Hospital Setting
title_sort monitoring efficacy of neurogenic bowel dysfunction treatment on response (mentor) in a non-hospital setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33445668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020263
work_keys_str_mv AT studsgaardslotsofiedagmar themonitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT baunwallsimonmarkdahl themonitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT emmanuelanton themonitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT christensenpeter themonitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT kroghklaus themonitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT studsgaardslotsofiedagmar monitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT baunwallsimonmarkdahl monitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT emmanuelanton monitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT christensenpeter monitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting
AT kroghklaus monitoringefficacyofneurogenicboweldysfunctiontreatmentonresponsementorinanonhospitalsetting